Proceedings of the Comprehensive Oncology Network Evaluating Rare CNS Tumors (NCI-CONNECT) Oligodendroglioma Workshop.

Background: Oligodendroglioma is a rare primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor with highly variable outcome and for which therapy is usually not curative. At present, little is known regarding the pathways involved with progression of oligodendrogliomas or optimal biomarkers for stratifying risk. Developing new therapies for this rare cancer is especially challenging. To overcome these challenges, the neuro-oncology community must be particularly innovative, seeking multi-institutional and international collaborations, and establishing partnerships with patients and advocacy groups thereby ensuring that each patient enrolled in a study is as informative as possible. Methods: The mission of the National Cancer Institute\u27s NCI-CONNECT program is to address the challenges and unmet needs in rare CNS cancer research and treatment by connecting patients, health care providers, researchers, and advocacy organizations to work in partnership. On November 19, 2018, the program convened a workshop on oligodendroglioma, one of the 12 rare CNS cancers included in its initial portfolio. The purpose of this workshop was to discuss scientific progress and regulatory challenges in oligodendroglioma research and develop a call to action to advance research and treatment for this cancer. Results: The recommendations of the workshop include a multifaceted and interrelated approach covering: biology and preclinical models, data sharing and advanced molecular diagnosis and imaging; clinical trial design; and patient outreach and engagement. Conclusions: The NCI-CONNECT program is well positioned to address challenges in oligodendroglioma care and research in collaboration with other stakeholders and is developing a list of action items for future initiatives

Efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with pituitary carcinoma: report of four cases from a phase II study

Pituitary carcinoma is an aggressive tumor characterized by metastatic spread beyond the sellar region. Symptoms can be debilitating due to hormonal excess and survival is poor. Pituitary carcinomas recur despite conventional multimodality treatments. Given the recent advances in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) to treat various solid cancers, there has been interest in exploring the role of immunotherapy for treating aggressive, refractory pituitary tumors. We treated 4 patients with pituitary carcinoma with pembrolizumab as part of a phase II clinical trial. Two patients (patients 1 and 2) with functioning corticotroph pituitary carcinomas (refractory to surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) had partial radiographic (60% and 32% per Immune-Related Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors, respectively) and hormonal responses. Patient 1’s response continues 42 months after initiation of pembrolizumab and his tumor tissue obtained after treatment with temozolomide demonstrated a hypermutator phenotype with MSH2 and MSH6 gene mutations. Patient 2’s tumor after exposure to temozolomide was not sampled, but prior somatic mutational testing was negative. One patient with a non-functioning corticotroph tumor (patient 3) had a best response of stable disease for 4 months. One patient with a prolactin-secreting carcinoma (patient 4) had progressive disease. The latter 2 patients’ tumors did not demonstrate a hypermutator phenotype after treatment with temozolomide. Programmed death-ligand 1 staining was negative in all tumors. We report 2 cases of corticotroph pituitary carcinoma responsive to pembrolizumab after prior exposure to alkylating agents. The role of CPIs in treating patients with pituitary carcinoma, the relationship between tumor subtype and response to immunotherapy and mechanisms of hypermutation in this orphan disease require further study.Trial registration number: NCT02721732

Optimizing eligibility criteria and clinical trial conduct to enhance clinical trial participation for primary brain tumor patients

Building on an initiative to enhance clinical trial participation involving the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Working Group, patient advocacy groups, clinical trial cooperative groups, and other partners, we evaluate the impact of eligibility criteria and trial conduct on neuro-oncology clinical trial participation. Clinical trials often carry forward eligibility criteria from prior studies that may be overly restrictive, unnecessary, and needlessly limit patient accrual. Inclusion and exclusion criteria should be evaluated based on the goals and design of the study and whether they impact patient safety and/or treatment efficacy. In addition, we evaluate clinical trial conduct as barriers to accrual and discuss strategies to minimize such barriers for neuro-oncology trials