427 research outputs found

    Serum cholesterol levels in neutropenic patients with fever

    Get PDF
    Hypocholesterolemia, which often accompanies infectious diseases has been suggested to serve as a prognostic marker in hospitalized patients. Even though patients with chemotherapyinduced leukopenia are at high risk of infection and mortality, only limited information is available on serum cholesterol levels in these patients. We therefore measured serum cholesterol levels in 17 patients with hematological malignancies during chemotherapyinduced neutropenia and correlated it with clinical outcome. Patients with fever (>38.5 degreesC) showed a significant decrease in serum cholesterol levels within 24 hours. Eight days after onset of the fever nonsurvivors had significantly lower serum cholesterol levels (median 2.09 mmol/l, range 0.492.79, n=6) compared to survivors (median 3.23 mmol/l, range 1.684.86, n=11). Cholesterol levels in survivors returned to baseline levels at the time of discharge from the hospital. At the onset of fever, serum levels of inflammatory cytokines interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and soluble TNF receptors p55 and p75 were elevated in all patients, but only TNF and TNF receptor p75 levels were significantly different in survivors and nonsurvivors. Our data suggest that a decrease in serum cholesterol levels is a prognostic marker in neutropenic patients with fever. Release of inflammatory cytokines may in part be responsible for hypocholesterolemia in these patients

    Testicular Adrenal Rest Tumours in Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia

    Get PDF
    In adult patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), the presence of testicular adrenal rest tumours (TART) is an important complication leading to gonadal dysfunction and infertility. These tumours can be already found in childhood and puberty. In this paper, we review the embryological, histological, biochemical, and clinical features of TART and discuss treatment options

    Circulating Sclerostin Levels Are Decreased in Patients with Endogenous Hypercortisolism and Increase after Treatment

    Get PDF
    CONTEXT: Increased bone fragility is a frequent complication of hypercortisolism due predominantly to suppression of bone formation. Sclerostin is an osteocyte-produced negative regulator of bone formation, which is up-regulated by glucocorticoids in mice. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the effect of endogenous hypercortisolism on circulating sclerostin and bone turnover in humans. DESIGN: We measured sclerostin, beta-C-terminal telopeptide, amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen, and fibroblast growth factor 23 in blood samples of 21 patients with endogenous hypercortisolism and 21 age- and gender-matched controls. In 12 patients, measurements were repeated at various time intervals after successful surgical treatment (transsphenoidal surgery or adrenalectomy). RESULTS: Plasma sclerostin levels were significantly decreased in patients compared with controls (112+/-49 vs. 207+/-48 pg/ml, P<0.001). In the 12 patients who were evaluated after surgical treatment, sclerostin levels increased from 121.4+/-46.5 to 175.8+/-78.5 pg/ml (P=0.003). These changes in plasma sclerostin levels were accompanied by significant increases in levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 (from 44.2+/-12.2 to 84.0+/-58.8 pg/ml, P=0.017) and of the bone turnover markers amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen (from 31.7+/-18.2 to 94.2+/-92.2 ng/ml, P=0.037) and beta-C-terminal telopeptide (from 134.2+/-44 to 409.2+/-285 pg/ml, P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the findings in mice, circulating sclerostin is decreased in patients with chronic endogenous hypercortisolism and increases after treatment. These findings suggest that in humans, chronic exposure to glucocorticoids affects the number or function of osteocytes rather than the production of sclerostin

    Volumetric evaluation of CT images of adrenal glands in primary aldosteronism

    Get PDF
    Objectives: To investigate whether adrenal volumetry provides better agreement with adrenal vein sampling (AVS) than conventional CT for subtyping PA. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the size of this contralateral adrenal was a prognostic factor for clinical outcome after unilateral adrenalectomy.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed volumes of both adrenal glands of the 180 CT-scans (88/180 with unilateral and 92/180 with bilateral disease) of the patients with PA included in the SPARTACUS trial of which 85 also had undergone an AVS. In addition, we examined CT-scans of 20 healthy individuals to compare adrenal volumes with published normal values.Results: Adrenal volume was higher for the left than the right adrenal (mean and SD: 6.49 ± 2.77 ml versus 5.25 ± 1.87 ml for the right adrenal; p &lt; 0.001). Concordance between volumetry and AVS in subtyping was 58.8%, versus 51.8% between conventional CT results and AVS (p = NS). The volumes of the contralateral adrenals in the patients with unilateral disease (right 4.78 ± 1.37 ml; left 6.00 ± 2.73 ml) were higher than those of healthy controls reported in the literature (right 3.62 ± 1.23 ml p &lt; 0.001; left 4.84 ± 1.67 ml p = 0.02). In a multivariable analysis the contralateral volume was not associated with biochemical or clinical success, nor with the defined daily doses of antihypertensive agents at 1 year follow-up.Conclusions: Volumetry of the adrenal glands is not superior to current assessment of adrenal size by CT for subtyping patients with PA. Furthermore, in patients with unilateral disease the size of the contralateral adrenal is enlarged but its size is not associated with outcome.</p

    Decision-making experiences of patients and partners opting for active surveillance in esophageal cancer treatment

    Get PDF
    Objectives: This study explored the decision-making experiences of patients and their partners or primary caregiver who opted for experimental active surveillance (instead of standard surgery) for the treatment of esophageal cancer. Methods: Seventeen couples participated. Semi-structured interviews were conducted on couples’ joint experiences as well as their individual experiences. Preferred and perceived role in the treatment decision-making process was assessed using the adjusted version of the Control Preferences Scale, and perceived influence on the treatment decision was measured using a visual analog scale. Results: Couples reflected on the decision-making process as a positive collaboration, where patients retain their autonomy by making the final decision, and partners offer emotional support. Couples reported about an overwhelming amount and sometimes conflicting information about treatments among different hospitals and healthcare providers. Conclusions: Patients often involve their partner in decision-making, which they report to have enhanced their ability to cope with the disease. The amount and sometimes conflicting information during the decision-making process provide opportunities for improvement. Practice implications: Couples can benefit from an overview of what they can expect during treatment course. If active surveillance becomes an established treatment option in the future, provision of such overviews and consistent information should become more streamlined.</p

    Decision-making experiences of patients and partners opting for active surveillance in esophageal cancer treatment

    Get PDF
    Objectives: This study explored the decision-making experiences of patients and their partners or primary caregiver who opted for experimental active surveillance (instead of standard surgery) for the treatment of esophageal cancer. Methods: Seventeen couples participated. Semi-structured interviews were conducted on couples’ joint experiences as well as their individual experiences. Preferred and perceived role in the treatment decision-making process was assessed using the adjusted version of the Control Preferences Scale, and perceived influence on the treatment decision was measured using a visual analog scale. Results: Couples reflected on the decision-making process as a positive collaboration, where patients retain their autonomy by making the final decision, and partners offer emotional support. Couples reported about an overwhelming amount and sometimes conflicting information about treatments among different hospitals and healthcare providers. Conclusions: Patients often involve their partner in decision-making, which they report to have enhanced their ability to cope with the disease. The amount and sometimes conflicting information during the decision-making process provide opportunities for improvement. Practice implications: Couples can benefit from an overview of what they can expect during treatment course. If active surveillance becomes an established treatment option in the future, provision of such overviews and consistent information should become more streamlined.</p
    corecore