Treatment of adult-onset Still's disease: a review

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a rare inflammatory disorder that has been recently classified as a polygenic autoinflammatory disorder. The former classification, based on the disease course, seems to be quite dated. Indeed, there is accumulating evidence that AOSD can be divided into two distinct phenotypes based on cytokine profile, clinical presentation, and outcome, ie, a "systemic" pattern and an "articular" pattern. The first part of this review deals with the treatments that are currently available for AOSD. We then present the different strategies based on the characteristics of the disease according to clinical presentation. To do so, we focus on the two subsets of the disease. Finally, we discuss the management of life-threatening complications of AOSD, along with the therapeutic options during pregnancy

Commentary

International audienc

Pathophysiology, subtypes, and treatments of adult-onset Still's disease: An update

International audienceAdult-onset Still's disease is a rare and difficult to diagnose multisystemic disorder considered as a multigenic autoinflammatory syndrome. Its immunopathogenesis seems to be at the crossroads between inflammasomopathies and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, the most severe manifestation of the disease. According to recent insights in the pathophysiology and thanks to cohort studies and therapeutic trials, two phenotypes of adult-onset Still's disease may be distinguished: a systemic pattern, initially highly symptomatic and with a higher risk to exhibit life-threatening complications such as reactive hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, where interleukin-1 blockade seems to be very effective, a chronic articular pattern, more indolent with arthritis in the foreground and less severe systemic manifestations, which would threat functional outcome and where interleukin-6 blockade seems to be more effective. This review focuses on these data

Refractory Sarcoidosis: A Review

Thomas El Jammal,1 Yvan Jamilloux,1 Mathieu Gerfaud-Valentin,1 Dominique Valeyre,2 Pascal Sève1,3 1Department of Internal Medicine, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France; 2Department of Pneumology, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Avicenne et Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Bobigny, France; 3Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle IMER, Lyon, F-69003, France, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, HESPER EA 7425, Lyon F-69008, FranceCorrespondence: Pascal SèveService de Médecine Interne, Groupement Hospitalier Nord, 103 Grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon F-69004, FranceTel +33 426 732 636Fax +33 426 732 637Email [email protected]: Sarcoidosis is a multi-system disease of unknown etiology characterized by granuloma formation in various organs (especially lung and mediastinohilar lymph nodes). In more than half of patients, the disease resolves spontaneously. When indicated, it usually responds to corticosteroids, the first-line treatment, but some patients may not respond or tolerate them. An absence of treatment response is rare and urges for verifying the absence of a diagnosis error, the good adherence of the treatment, the presence of active lesions susceptible to respond since fibrotic lesions are irreversible. That is when second-line treatments, immunosuppressants (methotrexate, leflunomide, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, hydroxychloroquine), should be considered. Methotrexate is the only first-line immunosuppressant validated by a randomized controlled trial. Refractory sarcoidosis is not yet a well-defined condition, but it remains a real challenge for the physicians. Herein, we considered refractory sarcoidosis as a disease in which second-line treatments are not sufficient to achieve satisfying disease control or satisfying corticosteroids tapering. Tumor necrosis alpha inhibitors, third-line treatments, have been validated through randomized controlled trials. There are currently no guidelines or recommendations regarding refractory sarcoidosis. Moreover, criteria defining non-response to treatment need to be clearly specified. The delay to achieve response to organ involvement and drugs also should be defined. In the past ten years, the efficacy of several immunosuppressants beforehand used in other autoimmune or inflammatory diseases was reported in refractory cases series. Among them, anti-CD20 antibodies (rituximab), repository corticotrophin injection, and anti-JAK therapy anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody (tocilizumab) were the main reported. Unfortunately, no clinical trial is available to validate their use in the case of sarcoidosis. Currently, other immunosuppressants such as JAK inhibitors are on trial to assess their efficacy in sarcoidosis. In this review, we propose to summarize the state of the art regarding the use of immunosuppressants and their management in the case of refractory or multidrug-resistant sarcoidosis.Keywords: refractory sarcoidosis, JAK inhibitors, anti-TN

Pathogenesis of adult-onset Still's disease: new insights from the juvenile counterpart.

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a rare inflammatory disease characterized by the classical triad of daily fever, arthritis, and typical salmon-colored rash. Recent accumulation of knowledge, mostly arising from hereditary autoinflammatory diseases and from the systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), has given raise to new hypotheses on the pathophysiology of AOSD. In this review, we first discuss on the continuum between AOSD and sJIA. Then, we summarize current hypotheses on the underlying pathogenesis: (1) an infectious hypothesis; (2) an autoinflammatory hypothesis; (3) a lymphohistiocytic hypothesis; and (4) a hyperferritinemic hypothesis. Finally, we present the recent data suggesting that patients with AOSD fall into two distinct subgroups with different courses, one with prominent systemic features and one with chronic arthritis