261 research outputs found

    Sentencing Commissions and Guidelines by the Numbers: Cross-Jurisdictional Comparisons Made Easy by the Sentencing Guidelines Resource Center

    Get PDF
    Though the Sentencing Guidelines Resource Center highlights information for 26 jurisdictions, including the federal government, not all of these jurisdictions have sentencing guidelines. Neither do all of the jurisdictions have sentencing commissions. And over time, jurisdictions have moved back and forth between classifications as sentencing commissions have been formed and sunsetted and as guidelines systems have developed and been undercut by various factors, creating an even larger potential pool for study. This publication focuses on the 17 jurisdictions that exhibit the strongest characteristics of sentencing guidelines: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, U.S., Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Washington, D.C

    Catalytic Voids: Reprogramming Chinatown Alleyways By Utilizing Their Intrinsic Facades

    Get PDF
    This doctoral project studies the intrinsic characteristics of alleyways to identify catalyst moments for reprogramming. Alleyways are underutilized spaces, but with the integration of transformable installations that respond to specific site conditions and user needs, alleyways can be reclaimed for public use. Multiple scales were analyzed in order to catalog alleyway typologies and roles within an urban fabric. Current revitalization projects occurring within alleyways today were also studied to pinpoint successful uses of alleyway spaces. Chinatown alleyways were selected due to their Low-Rise Mixed-Use context and the juxtaposition of the standardized storefront facades with the alleyway facades. The facade of alleyways represents their intrinsic features (materiality, textures, hidden elements and historical characteristics) which makes them unique. A design guideline for choosing and evaluating the alleys was created in order to apply it to any alleyway, specifically the alleys in Honolulu’s Chinatown district. The premise is to identify the intrinsic qualities of the alleyways and utilize them with transformable interventions to reprogram their use.This doctoral project studies the intrinsic characteristics of alleyways to identify catalyst moments for reprogramming. Alleyways are underutilized spaces, but with the integration of transformable installations that respond to specific site conditions and user needs, alleyways can be reclaimed for public use. Multiple scales were analyzed in order to catalog alleyway typologies and roles within an urban fabric. Current revitalization projects occurring within alleyways today were also studied to pinpoint successful uses of alleyway spaces. Chinatown alleyways were selected due to their Low-Rise Mixed-Use context and the juxtaposition of the standardized storefront facades with the alleyway facades. The facade of alleyways represents their intrinsic features (materiality, textures, hidden elements and historical characteristics) which makes them unique. A design guideline for choosing and evaluating the alleys was created in order to apply it to any alleyway, specifically the alleys in Honolulu’s Chinatown district. The premise is to identify the intrinsic qualities of the alleyways and utilize them with transformable interventions to reprogram their use.This doctoral project studies the intrinsic characteristics of alleyways to identify catalyst moments for reprogramming. Alleyways are underutilized spaces, but with the integration of transformable installations that respond to specific site conditions and user needs, alleyways can be reclaimed for public use. Multiple scales were analyzed in order to catalog alleyway typologies and roles within an urban fabric. Current revitalization projects occurring within alleyways today were also studied to pinpoint successful uses of alleyway spaces. Chinatown alleyways were selected due to their Low-Rise Mixed-Use context and the juxtaposition of the standardized storefront facades with the alleyway facades. The facade of alleyways represents their intrinsic features (materiality, textures, hidden elements and historical characteristics) which makes them unique. A design guideline for choosing and evaluating the alleys was created in order to apply it to any alleyway, specifically the alleys in Honolulu’s Chinatown district. The premise is to identify the intrinsic qualities of the alleyways and utilize them with transformable interventions to reprogram their use.This doctoral project studies the intrinsic characteristics of alleyways to identify catalyst moments for reprogramming. Alleyways are underutilized spaces, but with the integration of transformable installations that respond to specific site conditions and user needs, alleyways can be reclaimed for public use. Multiple scales were analyzed in order to catalog alleyway typologies and roles within an urban fabric. Current revitalization projects occurring within alleyways today were also studied to pinpoint successful uses of alleyway spaces. Chinatown alleyways were selected due to their Low-Rise Mixed-Use context and the juxtaposition of the standardized storefront facades with the alleyway facades. The facade of alleyways represents their intrinsic features (materiality, textures, hidden elements and historical characteristics) which makes them unique. A design guideline for choosing and evaluating the alleys was created in order to apply it to any alleyway, specifically the alleys in Honolulu’s Chinatown district. The premise is to identify the intrinsic qualities of the alleyways and utilize them with transformable interventions to reprogram their use.This doctoral project studies the intrinsic characteristics of alleyways to identify catalyst moments for reprogramming. Alleyways are underutilized spaces, but with the integration of transformable installations that respond to specific site conditions and user needs, alleyways can be reclaimed for public use. Multiple scales were analyzed in order to catalog alleyway typologies and roles within an urban fabric. Current revitalization projects occurring within alleyways today were also studied to pinpoint successful uses of alleyway spaces. Chinatown alleyways were selected due to their Low-Rise Mixed-Use context and the juxtaposition of the standardized storefront facades with the alleyway facades. The facade of alleyways represents their intrinsic features (materiality, textures, hidden elements and historical characteristics) which makes them unique. A design guideline for choosing and evaluating the alleys was created in order to apply it to any alleyway, specifically the alleys in Honolulu’s Chinatown district. The premise is to identify the intrinsic qualities of the alleyways and utilize them with transformable interventions to reprogram their use.This doctoral project studies the intrinsic characteristics of alleyways to identify catalyst moments for reprogramming. Alleyways are underutilized spaces, but with the integration of transformable installations that respond to specific site conditions and user needs, alleyways can be reclaimed for public use. Multiple scales were analyzed in order to catalog alleyway typologies and roles within an urban fabric. Current revitalization projects occurring within alleyways today were also studied to pinpoint successful uses of alleyway spaces. Chinatown alleyways were selected due to their Low-Rise Mixed-Use context and the juxtaposition of the standardized storefront facades with the alleyway facades. The facade of alleyways represents their intrinsic features (materiality, textures, hidden elements and historical characteristics) which makes them unique. A design guideline for choosing and evaluating the alleys was created in order to apply it to any alleyway, specifically the alleys in Honolulu’s Chinatown district. The premise is to identify the intrinsic qualities of the alleyways and utilize them with transformable interventions to reprogram their use.This doctoral project studies the intrinsic characteristics of alleyways to identify catalyst moments for reprogramming. Alleyways are underutilized spaces, but with the integration of transformable installations that respond to specific site conditions and user needs, alleyways can be reclaimed for public use. Multiple scales were analyzed in order to catalog alleyway typologies and roles within an urban fabric. Current revitalization projects occurring within alleyways today were also studied to pinpoint successful uses of alleyway spaces. Chinatown alleyways were selected due to their Low-Rise Mixed-Use context and the juxtaposition of the standardized storefront facades with the alleyway facades. The facade of alleyways represents their intrinsic features (materiality, textures, hidden elements and historical characteristics) which makes them unique. A design guideline for choosing and evaluating the alleys was created in order to apply it to any alleyway, specifically the alleys in Honolulu’s Chinatown district. The premise is to identify the intrinsic qualities of the alleyways and utilize them with transformable interventions to reprogram their use.This doctoral project studies the intrinsic characteristics of alleyways to identify catalyst moments for reprogramming. Alleyways are underutilized spaces, but with the integration of transformable installations that respond to specific site conditions and user needs, alleyways can be reclaimed for public use. Multiple scales were analyzed in order to catalog alleyway typologies and roles within an urban fabric. Current revitalization projects occurring within alleyways today were also studied to pinpoint successful uses of alleyway spaces. Chinatown alleyways were selected due to their Low-Rise Mixed-Use context and the juxtaposition of the standardized storefront facades with the alleyway facades. The facade of alleyways represents their intrinsic features (materiality, textures, hidden elements and historical characteristics) which makes them unique. A design guideline for choosing and evaluating the alleys was created in order to apply it to any alleyway, specifically the alleys in Honolulu’s Chinatown district. The premise is to identify the intrinsic qualities of the alleyways and utilize them with transformable interventions to reprogram their use.This doctoral project studies the intrinsic characteristics of alleyways to identify catalyst moments for reprogramming. Alleyways are underutilized spaces, but with the integration of transformable installations that respond to specific site conditions and user needs, alleyways can be reclaimed for public use. Multiple scales were analyzed in order to catalog alleyway typologies and roles within an urban fabric. Current revitalization projects occurring within alleyways today were also studied to pinpoint successful uses of alleyway spaces. Chinatown alleyways were selected due to their Low-Rise Mixed-Use context and the juxtaposition of the standardized storefront facades with the alleyway facades. The facade of alleyways represents their intrinsic features (materiality, textures, hidden elements and historical characteristics) which makes them unique. A design guideline for choosing and evaluating the alleys was created in order to apply it to any alleyway, specifically the alleys in Honolulu’s Chinatown district. The premise is to identify the intrinsic qualities of the alleyways and utilize them with transformable interventions to reprogram their use.This doctoral project studies the intrinsic characteristics of alleyways to identify catalyst moments for reprogramming. Alleyways are underutilized spaces, but with the integration of transformable installations that respond to specific site conditions and user needs, alleyways can be reclaimed for public use. Multiple scales were analyzed in order to catalog alleyway typologies and roles within an urban fabric. Current revitalization projects occurring within alleyways today were also studied to pinpoint successful uses of alleyway spaces. Chinatown alleyways were selected due to their Low-Rise Mixed-Use context and the juxtaposition of the standardized storefront facades with the alleyway facades. The facade of alleyways represents their intrinsic features (materiality, textures, hidden elements and historical characteristics) which makes them unique. A design guideline for choosing and evaluating the alleys was created in order to apply it to any alleyway, specifically the alleys in Honolulu’s Chinatown district. The premise is to identify the intrinsic qualities of the alleyways and utilize them with transformable interventions to reprogram their use.This doctoral project studies the intrinsic characteristics of alleyways to identify catalyst moments for reprogramming. Alleyways are underutilized spaces, but with the integration of transformable installations that respond to specific site conditions and user needs, alleyways can be reclaimed for public use. Multiple scales were analyzed in order to catalog alleyway typologies and roles within an urban fabric. Current revitalization projects occurring within alleyways today were also studied to pinpoint successful uses of alleyway spaces. Chinatown alleyways were selected due to their Low-Rise Mixed-Use context and the juxtaposition of the standardized storefront facades with the alleyway facades. The facade of alleyways represents their intrinsic features (materiality, textures, hidden elements and historical characteristics) which makes them unique. A design guideline for choosing and evaluating the alleys was created in order to apply it to any alleyway, specifically the alleys in Honolulu’s Chinatown district. The premise is to identify the intrinsic qualities of the alleyways and utilize them with transformable interventions to reprogram their use

    ABA Collateral Consequences Summit: A Focused Dialogue for Improvement

    Get PDF

    Criminal History Enhancements Sourcebook

    Get PDF
    Criminal history scores make up one of the two most significant determinants of the punishment an offender receives in a sentencing guidelines jurisdiction. While prior convictions are taken into account by all U.S. sentencing systems, sentencing guidelines make the role of prior crimes more explicit by specifying the counting rules and by indicating the effect of prior convictions on sentence severity. Yet, once established, criminal history scoring formulas go largely unexamined. Moreover, there is great diversity across state and federal jurisdictions in the ways that an offender's criminal record is considered by courts at sentencing. This Sourcebook brings together for the first time information on criminal history enhancements in all existing U.S. sentencing guidelines systems. Building on this base, the Sourcebook examines major variations in the approaches taken by these systems, and identifies the underlying sentencing policy issues raised by such enhancements.The Sourcebook contains the following elements:A summary of criminal history enhancements in all guidelines jurisdictions;An analysis of the critical dimensions of an offender's previous convictions;A discussion of the policy options available to commissions considering amendments to their criminal history enhancements;A bibliography of key readings on the role of prior convictions at sentencing

    The Continuing Leverage of Releasing Authorities: Findings from a National Survey

    Get PDF
    The Robina Institute of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice launched a national survey of releasing authorities in March 2015 to each state, and the U.S. Parole Commission. The importance of the survey was underscored by an endorsement from the Association of Paroling Authorities International (APAI). We are pleased to present the results from this important survey here. This is the first comprehensive survey of parole boards completed in nearly 10 years. Its findings provide a rich database for better understanding the policy and practice of paroling authorities. The last survey to be conducted of paroling authorities was in 2007/2008.The current report offers an expansion and update of previous surveys. The results summarized throughout the report offer a timely resource for paroling authorities, correctional policy-makers and practitioners, legislators, and those with a public policy interest in sentencing and criminal justice operations. It is our hope that the document and its findings provide key justice system and other stakeholders with an incisive snapshot of the work of paroling authorities across the country in a manner that contributes to a larger conversation about sound and effective parole release and revocation practices.The completion of this comprehensive survey and the reporting of its findings offers a timely and invaluable resource for releasing authorities. It provides them and other key justice system stakeholders with a comparative understanding of their colleagues' work across the nation, and contributes to a larger conversation pertaining to effective parole release and revocation practices

    Risk Averse and Disinclined: What COVID Prison Releases Demonstrate About the Ability of the United States to Reduce Mass Incarceration

    Get PDF
    "Risk Averse and Disinclined" builds upon prior findings produced last year through the Institute's publication ?"Examining Prison Releases in Response to COVID: Lessons Learned for Reducing the Effects of Mass Incarceration." Through this new report, researchers present case studies of six states?—?Alabama, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Washington?—?to gain a more in-depth view of what legal mechanisms were available to jurisdictions and the factors that influenced whether they were willing or able to use those mechanisms to release people from prison during the pandemic. The findings of this report show that although jurisdictions have the power to make releases from prison using back-end discretion, they are unlikely to use it due to risk aversion stemming from the fear of public and political backlash should anyone who is released go on to commit a serious crime. Thus, the authors continue to conclude that back-end release mechanisms offer only a modest opportunity to reduce mass incarceration. Instead, state-level carceral policies that focus on diffusing responsibility for back-end release and reduce incarceration in the first place have the greatest chance of achieving long-term reductions in prison populations

    Profiles in Probation Revocation: Examining the Legal Framework in 21 States

    Get PDF
    This report compiles—in a convenient format—the results of a yearlong research project on the laws relating to probation revocation in 21 American states. 2 By leafing through the four-page "legal profiles" presented in this volume, readers can easily see how much variation exists in statewide laws of probation and probation revocation, while zeroing in on issues of greatest interest. Whether a reader's jurisdiction is included in the report's 21 states or not, the legal profiles contain a wealth of information that will allow for comparison with one's own system. We think every reader—no matter how experienced in the field—will come across practices or ideas in this study that they never heard of before.The report assumes that American states have much to learn from one another. Justice Louis Brandeis famously believed that the states can serve as "laboratories" for innovations in law and policy, so that best practices can emerge and be brought to the attention of other states for possible adoption or adaptation. 3 In order for Brandeis's laboratory to be a reality, however, the states must have some way of learning about the practices of other jurisdictions. In an increasingly complex and specialized world, this is a daunting task—and one that often requires a heavy investment in research. The Robina Institute of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice has made such an investment in this report. We hope it will allow readers to see their home jurisdictions in new perspective, and will further the nationwide process of dialogue and improvement that Justice Brandeis envisioned.This introduction gives a short overview of why the subject matter is important and how the report fits within a larger Probation Revocation Project launched by the Robina Institute in 2013. The introduction will also discuss the ambitions, scope, limitations, and uses of the state legal profiles
    • 

    corecore