Reply to "Comment on 'Kinetic theory for a mobile impurity in a degenerate Tonks-Girardeau gas'"

In our recent paper [Phys. Rev. E 90, 032132 (2014)] we have studied the dynamics of a mobile impurity particle weakly interacting with the Tonks-Girardeau gas and pulled by a small external force, $F$. Working in the regime when the thermodynamic limit is taken prior to the small force limit, we have found that the Bloch oscillations of the impurity velocity are absent in the case of a light impurity. Further, we have argued that for a light impurity the steady state drift velocity, $V_D$, remains finite in the limit $F\rightarrow 0$. These results are in contradiction with earlier works by Gangardt, Kamenev and Schecter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 070402 (2009), Annals of Physics 327, 639 (2012)]. One of us (OL) has conjectured [Phys. Rev. A 91, 040101 (2015)] that the central assumption of these works - the adiabaticity of the dynamics - can break down in the thermodynamic limit. In the preceding Comment [Phys. Rev. E 92, 016101 (2015)] Schecter, Gangardt and Kamenev have argued against this conjecture and in support of the existence of Bloch oscillations and linearity of $V_D(F)$. They have suggested that the ground state of the impurity-fluid system is a quasi-bound state and that this is sufficient to ensure adiabaticity in the thermodynamic limit. Their analytical argument is based on a certain truncation of the Hilbert space of the system. We argue that extending the results and intuition based on their truncated model on the original many-body problem lacks justification

Momentum relaxation of a mobile impurity in a one-dimensional quantum gas

We investigate the time evolution of the momentum of an impurity atom injected into a degenerate Tonks-Girardeau gas. We establish that given an initial momentum $p_0$ the impurity relaxes to a steady state with a non-vanishing momentum $p_\infty.$ The nature of the steady state is found to depend drastically on whether the masses of the impurity and the host are equal or not. This is due to multiple coherent scattering processes leading to a resonant interaction between the impurity and the host in the case of equal masses. The dependence of $p_\infty$ on $p_0$ remains non-trivial even in the limit of vanishing interaction between the impurity and host particles. In this limit $p_\infty(p_0)$ is found explicitly