The rarest aortic arch anomaly : a case report of asymptomatic isolation of the subclavian artery

We present a rare case of isolated right subclavian artery arising from a right-sided patent arterial duct in a patient with DiGeorge syndrome, diagnosed on cardiac CT, along with potential complications and management approaches.peer-reviewe

Impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular testing in the United States versus the rest of the world

Objectives: This study sought to quantify and compare the decline in volumes of cardiovascular procedures between the United States and non-US institutions during the early phase of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the care of many non-COVID-19 illnesses. Reductions in diagnostic cardiovascular testing around the world have led to concerns over the implications of reduced testing for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data were submitted to the INCAPS-COVID (International Atomic Energy Agency Non-Invasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19), a multinational registry comprising 909 institutions in 108 countries (including 155 facilities in 40 U.S. states), assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on volumes of diagnostic cardiovascular procedures. Data were obtained for April 2020 and compared with volumes of baseline procedures from March 2019. We compared laboratory characteristics, practices, and procedure volumes between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and between U.S. geographic regions and identified factors associated with volume reduction in the United States. Results: Reductions in the volumes of procedures in the United States were similar to those in non-U.S. facilities (68% vs. 63%, respectively; p = 0.237), although U.S. facilities reported greater reductions in invasive coronary angiography (69% vs. 53%, respectively; p < 0.001). Significantly more U.S. facilities reported increased use of telehealth and patient screening measures than non-U.S. facilities, such as temperature checks, symptom screenings, and COVID-19 testing. Reductions in volumes of procedures differed between U.S. regions, with larger declines observed in the Northeast (76%) and Midwest (74%) than in the South (62%) and West (44%). Prevalence of COVID-19, staff redeployments, outpatient centers, and urban centers were associated with greater reductions in volume in U.S. facilities in a multivariable analysis. Conclusions: We observed marked reductions in U.S. cardiovascular testing in the early phase of the pandemic and significant variability between U.S. regions. The association between reductions of volumes and COVID-19 prevalence in the United States highlighted the need for proactive efforts to maintain access to cardiovascular testing in areas most affected by outbreaks of COVID-19 infection

Native T1 and T2 Reference Values for Maltese Healthy Cohort

Abstract BackgroundCardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is increasingly being used for diagnosing various cardiac conditions. Parametric mapping enables quantitative myocardial characterization by directly measuring myocardial T1 and T2 values. However, reference values of parametric mapping are not standardized across different vendors and scanners, causing drawbacks for clinical implementation of this technique across different sites. We assessed the reference ranges of native T1 and T2 values in a healthy Maltese cohort to establish a local parametric mapping service. Methods and ResultsHealthy subjects (n=51; mean age 36.0 [range 19-59] years) with normal cardiac function on CMR were recruited. Subjects underwent uniform parametric mapping pulse sequences (MOLLI 5(3)3 for native T1 mapping, and gradient echo single shot FLASH readout for T2 mapping) on a 3T Siemens MAGNETOM Vida scanner. Native T1 and T2 values were measured by placing a region of interest within the interventricular septum at midventricular level. Intra- and inter-observer variability were assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Normal distribution of data was assessed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p-value of 0.773 for native T1, p-value of 0.125 for T2). Mean ±1.96 SD was used as a reference range. Mean native T1 and T2 values were 1200.1 ±30.7 ms and 39.5 ±1.8 ms, respectively. All parameters had excellent day-to-day intra-observer reproducibility and inter-observer reproducibility. ConclusionFor the first time in Malta, we established the native T1 and T2 parametric mapping reference values for healthy Caucasian Maltese individuals. This will assist cardiologists to establish diagnosis, disease progression, and response to treatment of various myocardial diseases locally.</jats:p

Native T1 and T2 Reference Values for Maltese Healthy Cohort

Abstract BackgroundCardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is increasingly being used for diagnosing various cardiac conditions. Parametric mapping enables quantitative myocardial characterization by directly measuring myocardial T1 and T2 values. However, reference values of parametric mapping are not standardized across different vendors and scanners, causing drawbacks for clinical implementation of this technique across different sites. We assessed the reference ranges of native T1 and T2 values in a healthy Maltese cohort to establish a local parametric mapping service. Methods and ResultsHealthy subjects (n=51; mean age 36.0 [range 19-59] years) with normal cardiac function on CMR were recruited. Subjects underwent uniform parametric mapping pulse sequences (MOLLI 5(3)3 for native T1 mapping, and gradient echo single shot FLASH readout for T2 mapping) on a 3T Siemens MAGNETOM Vida scanner. Native T1 and T2 values were measured by placing a region of interest within the interventricular septum at midventricular level. Intra- and inter-observer variability were assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Normal distribution of data was assessed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p-value of 0.773 for native T1, p-value of 0.125 for T2). Mean ±1.96 SD was used as a reference range. Mean native T1 and T2 values were 1200.1 ±30.7 ms and 39.5 ±1.8 ms, respectively. All parameters had excellent day-to-day intra-observer reproducibility and inter-observer reproducibility. ConclusionFor the first time in Malta, we established the native T1 and T2 parametric mapping reference values for healthy Caucasian Maltese individuals. This will assist cardiologists to establish diagnosis, disease progression, and response to treatment of various myocardial diseases locally.</jats:p

Inconsistency in aortic stenosis severity between CT and echocardiography: prevalence and insights into mechanistic differences using computational fluid dynamics

ObjectivesThe aims of this study were to evaluate the inconsistency of aortic stenosis (AS) severity between CT aortic valve area (CT-AVA) and echocardiographic Doppler parameters, and to investigate potential underlying mechanisms using computational fluid dynamics (CFD).MethodsA total of 450 consecutive eligible patients undergoing transcatheter AV implantation assessment underwent CT cardiac angiography (CTCA) following echocardiography. CT-AVA derived by direct planimetry and echocardiographic parameters were used to assess severity. CFD simulation was performed in 46 CTCA cases to evaluate velocity profiles.ResultsA CT-AVA&gt;1 cm2 was present in 23% of patients with echocardiographic peak velocity≥4 m/s (r=−0.33) and in 15% patients with mean Doppler gradient≥40 mm Hg (r=−0.39). Patients with inconsistent severity grading between CT and echocardiography had higher stroke volume index (43 vs 38 mL/m2, p&lt;0.003) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) flow rate (235 vs 192 cm3/s, p&lt;0.001). CFD simulation revealed high flow, either in isolation (p=0.01), or when associated with a skewed velocity profile (p=0.007), as the main cause for inconsistency between CT and echocardiography.ConclusionSevere AS by Doppler criteria may be associated with a CT-AVA&gt;1 cm2 in up to a quarter of patients. CFD demonstrates that haemodynamic severity may be exaggerated on Doppler analysis due to high LVOT flow rates, with or without skewed velocity profiles, across the valve orifice. These factors should be considered before making a firm diagnosis of severe AS and evaluation with CT can be helpful.</jats:sec

Worldwide Disparities in Recovery of Cardiac Testing 1 Year Into COVID-19

BACKGROUND The extent to which health care systems have adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic to provide necessary cardiac diagnostic services is unknown.OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the pandemic on cardiac testing practices, volumes and types of diagnostic services, and perceived psychological stress to health care providers worldwide.METHODS The International Atomic Energy Agency conducted a worldwide survey assessing alterations from baseline in cardiovascular diagnostic care at the pandemic's onset and 1 year later. Multivariable regression was used to determine factors associated with procedure volume recovery.RESULTS Surveys were submitted from 669 centers in 107 countries. Worldwide reduction in cardiac procedure volumes of 64% from March 2019 to April 2020 recovered by April 2021 in high- and upper middle-income countries (recovery rates of 108% and 99%) but remained depressed in lower middle- and low-income countries (46% and 30% recovery). Although stress testing was used 12% less frequently in 2021 than in 2019, coronary computed tomographic angiography was used 14% more, a trend also seen for other advanced cardiac imaging modalities (positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance; 22%-25% increases). Pandemic-related psychological stress was estimated to have affected nearly 40% of staff, impacting patient care at 78% of sites. In multivariable regression, only lower-income status and physicians' psychological stress were significant in predicting recovery of cardiac testing.CONCLUSIONS Cardiac diagnostic testing has yet to recover to prepandemic levels in lower-income countries. Worldwide, the decrease in standard stress testing is offset by greater use of advanced cardiac imaging modalities. Pandemic-related psychological stress among providers is widespread and associated with poor recovery of cardiac testing. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation