A non‐inferiority comparative analysis of micro‐ultrasonography and MRI‐targeted biopsy in men at risk of prostate cancer

Objective: To compare the efficacy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-directed and micro-ultrasonography (micro-US)-directed biopsy for detecting clinically significant (Grade Group >1) prostate cancer (csPCa). Materials and methods: A total of 203 patients were prospectively enrolled at three institutions across Germany and Austria in the period from January 2019 to December 2019. During each biopsy, the urologist was blinded to the mpMRI report until after the micro-US targets had been assessed. After unblinding, targets were then sampled using software-assisted fusion, followed by systematic samples. The primary outcome measure was non-inferiority of micro-US to detect csPCa, with a detection ratio of at least 80% that of mpMRI. Results: A total of 79 csPCa cases were detected overall (39%). Micro-US-targeted biopsy detected 58/79 cases (73%), while mpMRI-targeted biopsy detected 60/79 (76%) and non-targeted (completion sampling) samples detected 45/79 cases (57%). mpMRI-targeted samples alone detected 7/79 (9%) csPCa cases which were missed by micro-US-targeted and non-targeted samples. Three of these seven were anterior lesions with 2/7 in the transition zone. Micro-US-targeted samples alone detected 5/79 (6%) and completion sampling alone detected 4/79 cases (5%). Micro-US was non-inferior to mpMRI and detected 97% of the csPCa cases detected by mpMRI-targeted biopsy (95% CI 80-116%; P = 0.023). Conclusions: This is the first multicentre prospective study comparing micro-US-targeted biopsy with mpMRI-targeted biopsy. The study provides further evidence that micro-US can reliably detect cancer lesions and suggests that micro-US biopsy might be as effective as mpMRI for detection of csPCA. This result has significant implications for increasing accessibility, reducing costs and expediting diagnosis

The DEK oncoprotein is a Su(var) that is essential to heterochromatin integrity

Heterochromatin integrity is crucial for genome stability and regulation of gene expression, but the factors involved in mammalian heterochromatin biology are only incompletely understood. Here we identify the oncoprotein DEK, an abundant nuclear protein with a previously enigmatic in vivo function, as a Suppressor of Variegation [Su(var)] that is crucial to global heterochromatin integrity. We show that DEK interacts directly with Heterochromatin Protein 1 α (HP1α) and markedly enhances its binding to trimethylated H3K9 (H3K9me3), which is key for maintaining heterochromatic regions. Loss of Dek in Drosophila leads to a Su(var) phenotype and global reduction in heterochromatin. Thus, these findings show that DEK is a key factor in maintaining the balance between heterochromatin and euchromatin in vivo

Histone fold modifications control nucleosome unwrapping and disassembly

Nucleosomes are stable DNA–histone protein complexes that must be unwrapped and disassembled for genome expression, replication, and repair. Histone posttranslational modifications (PTMs) are major regulatory factors of these nucleosome structural changes, but the molecular mechanisms associated with PTM function remains poorly understood. Here we demonstrate that histone PTMs within distinct structured regions of the nucleosome directly regulate the inherent dynamic properties of the nucleosome. Precise PTMs were introduced into nucleosomes by chemical ligation. Single molecule magnetic tweezers measurements determined that only PTMs near the nucleosome dyad increase the rate of histone release in unwrapped nucleosomes. In contrast, FRET and restriction enzyme analysis reveal that only PTMs throughout the DNA entry–exit region increase unwrapping and enhance transcription factor binding to nucleosomal DNA. These results demonstrate that PTMs in separate structural regions of the nucleosome control distinct dynamic events, where the dyad regulates disassembly while the DNA entry–exit region regulates unwrapping. These studies are consistent with the conclusion that histone PTMs may independently influence nucleosome dynamics and associated chromatin functions