186 research outputs found

    Weed Control in Corn

    Get PDF
    Weeds are tough competitors with all crops. And the corn years of your rotation provide as good an opportunity as you\u27ll get to really kill weeds

    A Killer for Weeds in Soybeans

    Get PDF
    Timely use of the rotary hoe is an effective killer for weeds in soybeams. In this article, three Iowa State College scientists report directly to you on their tests comparing different weed-control methods

    DDT Granules - A New Way to Kill Corn Borers

    Get PDF
    The European corn borer actually is a misnamed insect. At least two-thirds of the worm stage of its life is spent feeding on the surface of leaves and leaf sheaths. Only during the latter part of its life does it tunnel into the stalk and become a borer

    For corn and soybeans - Narrow Rows

    Get PDF
    There\u27s yield advantage, but costs, too, in narrow rows as compared to 40-inch rows for corn and soybeans. Since costs of changing to narrow rows will vary from farm to farm, each farmer must decide his own best time, if ever, to change

    A Grassmann integral equation

    Full text link
    The present study introduces and investigates a new type of equation which is called Grassmann integral equation in analogy to integral equations studied in real analysis. A Grassmann integral equation is an equation which involves Grassmann integrations and which is to be obeyed by an unknown function over a (finite-dimensional) Grassmann algebra G_m. A particular type of Grassmann integral equations is explicitly studied for certain low-dimensional Grassmann algebras. The choice of the equation under investigation is motivated by the effective action formalism of (lattice) quantum field theory. In a very general setting, for the Grassmann algebras G_2n, n = 2,3,4, the finite-dimensional analogues of the generating functionals of the Green functions are worked out explicitly by solving a coupled system of nonlinear matrix equations. Finally, by imposing the condition G[{\bar\Psi},{\Psi}] = G_0[{\lambda\bar\Psi}, {\lambda\Psi}] + const., 0<\lambda\in R (\bar\Psi_k, \Psi_k, k=1,...,n, are the generators of the Grassmann algebra G_2n), between the finite-dimensional analogues G_0 and G of the (``classical'') action and effective action functionals, respectively, a special Grassmann integral equation is being established and solved which also is equivalent to a coupled system of nonlinear matrix equations. If \lambda \not= 1, solutions to this Grassmann integral equation exist for n=2 (and consequently, also for any even value of n, specifically, for n=4) but not for n=3. If \lambda=1, the considered Grassmann integral equation has always a solution which corresponds to a Gaussian integral, but remarkably in the case n=4 a further solution is found which corresponds to a non-Gaussian integral. The investigation sheds light on the structures to be met for Grassmann algebras G_2n with arbitrarily chosen n.Comment: 58 pages LaTeX (v2: mainly, minor updates and corrections to the reference section; v3: references [4], [17]-[21], [39], [46], [49]-[54], [61], [64], [139] added

    Liberalizing trade in environmental goods and services

    Get PDF
    We examine the effects of trade liberalization in environmental goods in a model with one domestic downstream polluting firm and two upstream firms (one domestic, one foreign). The upstream firms offer their technologies to the downstream firm at a flat fee. The domestic government sets the emission tax rate after the outcome of R&D is known. The effect of liberalization on the domestic upstream firm's R&D incentive is ambiguous. Liberalization usually results in cleaner production, which allows the country to reach higher welfare. However this increase in welfare is typically achieved at the expense of the environment (a backfire effect)
    • …
    corecore