Sociocultural Grounds of the Globalization Project

It is shown that the globalization may be considered as a joint project the authors have already found the way to be civilized with their own world view. Designing a project of the globalization involves setting the collective author’s mind of this project on doing self-organization, taking into consideration that there are preferred ways of self-organization in the culture of each civilization, it is assumed to coordinate these methods.Показано, что глобализацию можно рассматривать как совместный проект мироустройства авторов уже существующих цивилизационных проектов. Конструирование проекта глобализации предполагает задание способа самоорганизации коллективного автора этого проекта, при этом, учитывая, что в культуре каждой цивилизации существуют предпочитаемые способы самоорганизации, предполагается согласование этих способов

Socio-demographic characteristics of 46 participants.

<p>Socio-demographic characteristics of 46 participants.</p

Additional file 1 of Supporting people with type 2 diabetes in effective use of their medicine through mobile health technology integrated with clinical care (SuMMiT-D pilot): results of a feasibility randomised trial

Additional file 1. CONSORT 2010 checklist of information to include when reporting a pilot or feasibility trial

Additional file 1: Figure S1. of Blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy: examining feasibility in a prospective cohort study

Study Procedures. (DOCX 20 kb

Additional file 4: of Blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy: examining feasibility in a prospective cohort study

Supplementary Tables. Table S1. Table S2. Table S3. (DOCX 15 kb

Reducing bias in trials due to reactions to measurement: experts produced recommendations informed by evidence

Objective: This study (MEasurement Reactions In Trials) aimed to produce recommendations on how best to minimize bias from measurement reactivity (MR) in randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve health. Study design and setting: The MERIT study consisted of: (1) an updated systematic review that examined whether measuring participants had effects on participants’ health-related behaviors, relative to no-measurement controls, and three rapid reviews to identify: (i) existing guidance on MR; (ii) existing systematic reviews of studies that have quantified the effects of measurement on behavioral or affective outcomes; and (iii) studies that have investigated the effects of objective measurements of behavior on health-related behavior; (2) a Delphi study to identify the scope of the recommendations; and (3) an expert workshop in October 2018 to discuss potential recommendations in groups. Results: Fourteen recommendations were produced by the expert group to: (1) identify whether bias is likely to be a problem for a trial; (2) decide whether to collect data about whether bias is likely to be a problem; (3) design trials to minimize the likelihood of this bias. Conclusion: These recommendations raise awareness of how and where taking measurements can produce bias in trials, and are thus helpful for trial design