BDEEP vA5: East of Suez and the Commonwealth, 1964-1971

The British Documents on the End of Empire Project (BDEEP) is an initiative of the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London. Established in 1987 under the auspices of the British Academy, the Project has since published 18 volumes containing an annotated selection of official documents from the UK National Archives, charting British withdrawal from its colonial territories. Electronic versions of these volumes have been made available with the support of The Stationary Office under an Open Government Licence. Series A Volume 5 on 'East of Suez and the Commonwealth, 1964-1971' was published in 2004 in three parts, edited by SR Ashton and Wm Roger Louis

BDEEP vA4: The Conservative Government and the End of Empire, 1957-1964

The British Documents on the End of Empire Project (BDEEP) is an initiative of the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London. Established in 1987 under the auspices of the British Academy, the Project has since published 18 volumes containing an annotated selection of official documents from the UK National Archives, charting British withdrawal from its colonial territories. Electronic versions of these volumes have been made available with the support of The Stationary Office. Series A Volume 4 on 'The Conservative Government and the End of Empire, 1957-1964' was published in 2000 in two parts, edited by Ronald Hyam and Wm Roger Louis

Unfinished Decolonisation and Globalisation

This article locates John Darwin’s work on decolonisation within an Oxbridge tradition which portrays a British world system, of which formal empire was but one part, emerging to increasing global dominance from the early nineteenth century. In this mental universe, decolonisation was the mirror image of that expanding global power. According to this point of view, it was not the sloughing off of individual territories, but rather the shrinking away of the system and of the international norms that supported it, until only its ghost remained by the end of the 1960s. The article then asks, echoing the title of Darwin’s Unfinished Empire, whether the decolonisation project is all but complete, or still ongoing. In addition, what is the responsibility of the imperial historian to engage with, inform, or indeed refrain from, contemporary debates that relate to some of these issues? The answer is twofold. On the one hand, the toolkit that the Oxbridge tradition and Darwin provide remains relevant, and also useful in thinking about contemporary issues such as China’s move towards being a global power, the United States’ declining hegemony, and some states and groups desires to rearticulate their relationship with the global. On the other hand, the decline of world systems of power needs to be recognised as just one of several types of, and approaches to, analysing ‘decolonisation’. One which cannot be allowed to ignore or marginalise the study of others, such as experience, first nations issues, the shaping of the postcolonial state, and empire legacies. The article concludes by placing the Oxbridge tradition into a broader typology of types and methodologies of decolonisation, and by asking what a new historiography of decolonisation might look like. It suggests that it would address the Oxbridge concern with the lifecycles of systems of power and their relationship to global changes, but also place them alongside, and in dialogue with, a much broader set of perspectives and analytical approaches

Transglutaminases (TGs) in Ocular and Periocular Tissues: Effect of Muscarinic Agents on TGs in Scleral Fibroblasts

10.1371/journal.pone.0018326PLoS ONE64

Five Books on the End of Empire, by Wm. Roger Louis

Histor

The Robinson/Gallagher Theory and Bismarck's Colonial Policy

Wehler H-U. The Robinson/Gallagher Theory and Bismarck's Colonial Policy. In: Louis WR, ed. Imperialism : the Robinson and Gallagher controversy. Modern scholarship on European history. New York: New Viewpoints; 1976: 208-211