A Kinesin Family Member 6 Variant Is Associated With Coronary Heart Disease in the Women’s Health Study

ObjectivesWe asked if carriers of the 719Arg allele of kinesin family member 6 (KIF6) have increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in a cohort of initially healthy Caucasian American women.BackgroundThe 719Arg allele of KIF6 (rs20455) has been reported to be associated with increased risk of CHD in a large population-based prospective study, ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities), and in the placebo arms of 2 statin trials, CARE (Cholesterol and Recurrent Events) and WOSCOPS (West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study). However, this KIF6 variant was not specifically investigated in the female subgroup in the ARIC study, and the CARE and WOSCOPS trials included only a small number of female patients.MethodsGenotypes of the rs20455 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) were determined among 25,283 initially healthy Caucasian women, age 45 years and older, participating in the WHS (Women’s Health Study) who were prospectively followed over a 12-year period for incident cardiovascular events. The risk associated with the 719Arg allele of KIF6 was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models that adjusted for age and traditional risk factors.ResultsDuring follow-up, 953 women suffered a first-ever CHD event (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, or cardiovascular death) or first-ever ischemic stroke. Compared with noncarriers, carriers of the 719Arg allele had an increased risk of CHD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.24 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 1.46, p = 0.013]) and myocardial infarction (HR = 1.34 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.75, p = 0.034]) but not ischemic stroke.ConclusionsConfirming and extending previous reports, carriers of the 719Arg allele of KIF6 have 34% higher risk of myocardial infarction and 24% higher risk of CHD compared with noncarriers among 25,283 women from the WHS

Analysis of 17,576 Potentially Functional SNPs in Three Case–Control Studies of Myocardial Infarction

Myocardial infarction (MI) is a common complex disease with a genetic component. While several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been reported to be associated with risk of MI, they do not fully explain the observed genetic component of MI. We have been investigating the association between MI and SNPs that are located in genes and have the potential to affect gene function or expression. We have previously published studies that tested about 12,000 SNPs for association with risk of MI, early-onset MI, or coronary stenosis. In the current study we tested 17,576 SNPs that could affect gene function or expression. In order to use genotyping resources efficiently, we staged the testing of these SNPs in three case–control studies of MI. In the first study (762 cases, 857 controls) we tested 17,576 SNPs and found 1,949 SNPs that were associated with MI (P<0.05). We tested these 1,949 SNPs in a second study (579 cases and 1159 controls) and found that 24 SNPs were associated with MI (1-sided P<0.05) and had the same risk alleles in the first and second study. Finally, we tested these 24 SNPs in a third study (475 cases and 619 controls) and found that 5 SNPs in 4 genes (ENO1, FXN (2 SNPs), HLA-DPB2, and LPA) were associated with MI in the third study (1-sided P<0.05), and had the same risk alleles in all three studies. The false discovery rate for this group of 5 SNPs was 0.23. Thus, we have identified 5 SNPs that merit further examination for their potential association with MI. One of these SNPs (in LPA), has been previously shown to be associated with risk of cardiovascular disease in other studies

The contribution of a 9p21.3 variant, a KIF6 variant, and C-reactive protein to predicting risk of myocardial infarction in a prospective study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Genetic risk factors might improve prediction of coronary events. Several variants at chromosome 9p21.3 have been widely reported to be associated with coronary heart disease (CHD) in prospective and case-control studies. A variant of <it>KIF6 </it>(719Arg) has also been reported to be associated with increased risk of CHD in large prospective studies, but not in case-control studies. We asked whether the addition of genetic information (the 9p21.3 or <it>KIF6 </it>variants) or a well-established non-genetic risk factor (C-reactive protein [CRP]) can improve risk prediction by the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS)--a prospective observational study of risk factors for cardiovascular disease among > 5,000 participants aged 65 or older.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Improvement of risk prediction was assessed by change in the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) and by net reclassification improvement (NRI).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Among white participants the FRS was improved by addition of <it>KIF6 </it>719Arg carrier status among men as assessed by the AUC (from 0.581 to 0.596, P = 0.03) but not by NRI (NRI = 0.027, P = 0.32). Adding both CRP and 719Arg carrier status to the FRS improved risk prediction by the AUC (0.608, P = 0.02) and NRI (0.093, P = 0.008) in men, but not women (P ≥ 0.24).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>While none of these risk markers individually or in combination improved risk prediction among women, a combination of <it>KIF6 </it>719Arg carrier status and CRP levels modestly improved risk prediction among white men; although this improvement is not significant after multiple-testing correction. These observations should be investigated in other prospective studies.</p

Genome-Wide Study of Gene Variants Associated with Differential Cardiovascular Event Reduction by Pravastatin Therapy

Statin therapy reduces the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), however, the person-to-person variability in response to statin therapy is not well understood. We have investigated the effect of genetic variation on the reduction of CHD events by pravastatin. First, we conducted a genome-wide association study of 682 CHD cases from the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial and 383 CHD cases from the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS), two randomized, placebo-controlled studies of pravastatin. In a combined case-only analysis, 79 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were associated with differential CHD event reduction by pravastatin according to genotype (P<0.0001), and these SNPs were analyzed in a second stage that included cases as well as non-cases from CARE and WOSCOPS and patients from the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk/PHArmacogenomic study of Statins in the Elderly at risk for cardiovascular disease (PROSPER/PHASE), a randomized placebo controlled study of pravastatin in the elderly. We found that one of these SNPs (rs13279522) was associated with differential CHD event reduction by pravastatin therapy in all 3 studies: P = 0.002 in CARE, P = 0.01 in WOSCOPS, P = 0.002 in PROSPER/PHASE. In a combined analysis of CARE, WOSCOPS, and PROSPER/PHASE, the hazard ratio for CHD when comparing pravastatin with placebo decreased by a factor of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.52 to 0.75) for each extra copy of the minor allele (P = 4.8×10−7). This SNP is located in DnaJ homolog subfamily C member 5B (DNAJC5B) and merits investigation in additional randomized studies of pravastatin and other statins

Plasma arginine levels in arginase deficiency in the “real world”

Background: Deficiency of arginase-1, the final enzyme in the urea cycle, causes a distinct clinical syndrome and is characterized biochemically by a high level of plasma arginine. While conventional therapy for urea cycle disorders can lower these levels to some extent, it does not normalize them. Until now, research on plasma arginine levels in this disorder has primarily relied on data from specialized tertiary centers, which limits the ability to assess the natural history and treatment efficacy of arginase-1 deficiency due to the small number of patients in each center and technical variations in plasma arginine measurements among different laboratories. Method: In this study, we reported plasma arginine levels from 51 patients with arginase-1 deficiency in the database of Quest Diagnostics. The samples were collected from different US regions. Results: The mean plasma arginine level in these treated patients was 373 μmol/L and the median level was 368.4 μmol/L. Our data set from 30 arginase deficiency patients with plasma amino acid data from five or more collections revealed significant correlations between the levels of arginine and five other amino acids (citrulline, alanine, ornithine, glutamine, and asparagine). Conclusion: Despite treatment, the arginine levels remained persistently elevated and did not change significantly with age, suggesting the current treatment regimen is inadequate to control arginine levels and underscoring the need to seek more effective treatments for this disorder

LDL subfractions are associated with incident cardiovascular disease in the Malmö Prevention Project Study

Background and aims After assessing the risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) based on traditional risk factors, decisions concerning lipid lowering therapy might remain uncertain. To investigate whether lipoprotein subfraction levels could aid these decisions, we assessed the association between lipoprotein subfractions and CVD, after adjustment for traditional risk factors including standard lipids. Methods Using a case-cohort design, participants were randomly drawn from the Malmö Prevention Project (MPP), a population-based prospective study of 18,240 participants, and supplemented with additional incident CVD events (5764 participants, 1784 CVD events). Results Low density lipoprotein particle number (LDL-P) and individual subfractions ranging in size from very-small to large were associated with CVD (continuous p value (pcont) 20% 10-year risk of CVD), LDL-VS(a) and LDL-VS(b) were associated with CVD in fully adjusted models (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.67 and HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.53, respectively, pcont≤0.03). Conclusions Smaller LDL particles are associated with incident CVD independently of traditional risk factors, including standard lipids, in participants with low/intermediate and very-high risk, who might benefit from improved risk assessment

Use of low density lipoprotein particle number levels as an aid in statin treatment decisions for intermediate risk patients: A cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND: The 2013 ACC/AHA guideline recommended either no statin therapy or moderate-intensity statin therapy (MST) for intermediate risk patients—those with 5–7.5% 10-year risk and without cardiovascular disease (CVD), hypercholesterolemia or diabetes. The guideline further suggested that the therapy choice be based on patient-clinician discussions of risks and benefits. Since low-density lipoprotein particle (LDL-P) levels were reported to be associated with CVD independently of traditional risk factors in intermediate and low risk patients, we investigated the cost-effectiveness of using LDL-P levels to identify intermediate risk patients likely to benefit from initiating or intensifying statin therapy. METHODS: We evaluated 5 care strategies for intermediate risk patients. These included the strategies suggested by the guideline: no-statin therapy and MST. We compared each of these strategies to a related strategy that incorporated LDL-P testing. No-statin therapy was compared with the strategy of MST for those with high LDL-P levels and no statin therapy for all other patients (test-and-MST). MST was compared with the strategy of high-intensity statin therapy (HST) for those with high LDL-P levels and MST for all other patients (test-and-HST). We also evaluated the strategy of HST for all. Costs (payer perspective) and utilities were assessed over a 5-year time horizon in a Markov model of 100,000 hypothetical intermediate risk patients. RESULTS: HST dominated all other strategies, costing less and—despite causing 739 more cases of diabetes than did MST—resulting in more quality adjusted life-years (QALYs). For patient-clinician discussions that would otherwise lead to the MST strategy, we found the test-and-HST strategy reduced costs by $4.67 MM and resulted in 134 fewer CVD events and 115 additional QALYs. For patient-clinician discussions that would otherwise lead to no statin therapy, we found that the test-and-MST strategy reduced costs by$3.25 MM, resulted in 97 fewer CVD events and 44 additional QALYs. CONCLUSIONS: The HST strategy was cost saving and improved outcomes in intermediate risk patients. For patient and clinicians concerned about the adverse events associated with HST, using LDL-P levels to target intensified statin therapy could improve outcomes and reduce costs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-016-0429-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users