Factors associated with diagnosis of stages I and II lung cancer: a multivariate analysis

OBJECTIVE To present the overall survival rate for lung cancer and identify the factors associated with early diagnosis of stage I and II lung cancer. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study including individuals diagnosed with lung cancer, from January 2009 to December 2017, according to the cancer registry at UMass Memorial Medical Center. Five-year overall survival and its associated factors were identified by Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox’s proportional hazards model. Factors associated with diagnosing clinical stage I and II lung cancer were identified by bivariate and multivariate backward stepwise logistic regression (Log-likelihood ratio (LR)) at 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS The study was conducted with data on 2730 individuals aged 67.9 years on average, 51.5% of whom female, 92.3% white, and 6.6% never smoked. Five-year overall survival was 21%. Individuals diagnosed with early-stage disease had a 43% five-year survival rate compared to 8% for those diagnosed at late stages. Stage at diagnosis was the main factor associated with overall survival [HR = 4.08 (95%CI: 3.62–4.59)]. Factors associated with early diagnosis included patients older than 68 years [OR = 1.23 (95%CI: 1.04–1.45)], of the female gender [OR = 1.47 (95%CI: 1.24–1.73)], white [OR = 1.63 (95%CI: 1.16–2.30)], and never-smokers [OR = 1.37 (95%CI: 1.01–1.86)]; as well as tumors affecting the upper lobe [OR = 1.46 (95%CI: 1.24–1.73)]; adenocarcinoma [OR = 1.43 (95%CI: 1.21–1.69)]; and diagnosis after 2014 [OR = 1.61 (95%CI: 1.37–1.90)]. CONCLUSIONS Stage at diagnosis was the most decisive predictor for survival. Non-white and male individuals were more likely to be diagnosed at a late stage. Thus, promoting lung cancer early diagnosis by improving access to health care is vital to enhance overall survival for individuals with lung cancer

Impact of Timing of Lung resection on Survival for Clinical Stage I and II Lung Cancer

Background: Lung cancer has the highest mortality among the leading cancers in the U.S. Surgical resection is considered as the most effective treatment for lung cancer in early stages, providing greater long-term survival. Clinical guidelines on delays in resection of early-stage lung cancer do not exist. This work aims to assess whether increasing time between diagnosis/first doctor visit and surgery for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with poorer survival. Methods: We identified a retrospective cohort of incident lung cancer cases who had surgical treatment for lung cancer at our institution between January 2009 and December 2017, and no prior radiation or chemotherapy. We assessed overall survival (OS) and predictors included a) time from first contact to surgery; and b) time from diagnosis to surgery. The association between time from diagnosis and time from first contact to surgery, and survival for patients with early stage NSCLC was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard. We investigated four cut-off points: surgery within 15 days, 30 days, 60 days and 90 days. We controlled for sociodemographic characteristics as well as clinical outcomes. Results: Our cohort comprised 491 patients. The age average was 66.9 years, 61% female, 94.7% white, and 9% never smoked. Clinical Stage 1A and 1B corresponded to 86.5% of patients while in pathological stage it was 76%. The 5-year overall survival was 56.0%. Surgery occurred a median 40 days after the diagnosis and 43 days after the first visit and within 35 days if the first appointment was with a thoracic surgeon. The threshold time associated with statistically significant worse survival was 60 days after diagnosis. Surgery was performed more than 60 days of diagnosis in 115 (25.7%) patients, their OS was significantly worse than patients who had surgery earlier (HR=1.7 [95% CI: 1.1-2.6]). Conclusions: Greater intervals between diagnosis of early-stage NSCLC and surgery are associated with worse survival. Efforts to minimize delays, particularly factors that prolong the period from diagnosis to first contact with a lung cancer provider may improve survival

Esophageal Cancer Recurrence Patterns and Implications for Surveillance

Introduction:After definitive treatment of esophageal cancer, patients are at high risk for recurrence. Consistent follow-up is important for detection and treatment of recurrence. The optimal surveillance regimen remains undefined. We investigated posttreatment recurrence patterns and methods of detection in survivors of esophageal cancer.Methods:We retrospectively studied a cohort of patients who had undergone surgical resection for esophageal cancer at our institution between 1996 and 2010. Routine computed tomography scan and upper endoscopy were performed for surveillance.Results:In total, 1147 patients with resected esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma were included (median follow-up, 46 months). Of these, 723 patients (63%) had received neoadjuvant therapy before surgery. During follow-up, there were 595 deaths (52%) and 435 recurrences (38%) (distant [55%], locoregional [28%], or both [17%]). Half of recurrences were detected as a result of symptoms (n = 217), 45% by routine chest and abdominal computed tomography scan (n = 194), and 1% by surveillance upper endoscopy (n = 6). The recurrence rate decreased from 27 per 100 person-years in posttreatment year 1 to 4 per 100 person-years in year 6. In the first 2 years, the rate of recurrence was higher among patients who had received neoadjuvant therapy (35 per 100 person-years) than among those who had not (14 per 100 person-years) (p < 0.001).Conclusions:The incidence of recurrence is high after esophagectomy for cancer. Surveillance endoscopy has limited value for detection of asymptomatic local recurrence. The yield from follow-up scans diminishes significantly after the sixth year; surveillance scans after that point are likely unnecessary

Improving stamina and mobility with preop walking in surgical patients with frailty traits -OASIS IV: randomized clinical trial study protocol

BACKGROUND: Frail older surgical patients face more than a two-fold increase in postoperative complications, including myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, ileus, and others. Many of these complications occur because of postoperative loss of stamina and poor mobility. Preoperative exercise may better prepare these vulnerable patients for surgery. We present the protocol for our ongoing randomized trial to assess the impact of a preoperative walking intervention with remote coaching and pedometer on outcomes of stamina (six-minute walk distance- 6MWD) and mobility (postoperative steps) in older adults with frailty traits. METHODS: We will be conducting a randomized clinical trial with a total of 120 patients permitting up to a 33% rate of attrition, to reach a final sample size of 80 (with 40 patients for each study arm). We will include patients who are age 60 or higher, score 4 or greater on the Edmonton Frailty Scale assessment, and will be undergoing a surgical operation that requires a 2 or more night hospital stay to be eligible for our trial. Using block randomization stratified on baseline 6MWD, we will assign patients to wear a pedometer. At the end of three baseline days, an athletic trainer (AT) will provide a daily step count goal reflecting a 10-20% increase from baseline. Subsequently, the AT will call weekly to further titrate the goal or calls more frequently if the patient is not meeting the prescribed goal. Controls will receive general walking advice. Our main outcome is change in 6MWD on postoperative day (POD) 2/3 vs. baseline. We will also collect 6MWD approximately 4 weeks after surgery and daily in-hospital steps. CONCLUSION: If changes in a 6MWD and step counts are significantly higher for the intervention group, we believe this will confirm our hypothesis that the intervention leads to decreased loss of stamina and mobility. Once confirmed, we anticipate expanding to multiple centers to assess the interventional impact on clinical endpoints. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The randomized clinical trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov under the identifier NCT03892187 on March 27, 2019

Early Impact of Lung Cancer Screening in US population in the SEER Registries

Background: The Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and lung cancer specific survival (LCSS), likely due to finding early-stage NSCLC. Our study investigates the impact of the NLST publication in 2011 on the lung cancer outcomes in the general US Population by assessing the incidence rates, ratio of early/late stage, and lung cancer mortality in the years immediately prior to and following this publication. Methods: Rate sessions from the SEER18 database were accessed during the years 2008-2015. We analyzed overall lung cancer incidence and mortality rates. The ratio of early/late stage was obtained by dividing the number of stage I and II cases by the number of stage III and IV diagnosed by year. We investigate changes in level and trend using interrupted time series in STATA12, considering 2011 as the intervention. In addition, we performed a T-test for averages ratios comparing the years 2007-2010 to the years 2012-2015 for the entire lung cancer population and for subgroups by median family, ethnicity, Sex, Age and SEER Registry. Results: Although the overall lung cancer rates remained stable during the study period, a significant increase in the ratio of early/late stage was observed following the release of NLST for the overall lung cancer population (p=0.006) and for the screening age group (p= 0.014). The effects of ratio of early/late stage as noted in the overall group persisted for all patient subgroups, except for patients associated with a median income Conclusions: Since the publication of the NLST in 2011, there has been no impact on lung cancer mortality or incidence of lung cancer in the general US population. However, favorable increase in the proportion of early stage lung cancers, depending upon median family income, race and location. We expected a greater impact of lung cancer screening after 2015 since CT-screening for lung cancer was adopted by CMS and other insurances during that year

Robotic Left Lateral Basilar (S9) Segmentectomy

This video presents a robotic left lateral basilar (S9) segmentectomy. The patient was a fifty-six-year-old female with a sixty-pack-per-year smoking history and a two-year history of left lower lobe nodule contained to the lateral basilar segment. The nodule demonstrated recent growth and had developed a central solid component. The patient’s preoperative FEV1 was 113 percent with a DLCO of 80 percent. The patient reported significant dyspnea on exertion. A robotic left lateral basilar segmentectomy was recommended. The operation began with dissection of the inferior pulmonary ligament and mediastinal lymph node. The left pulmonary artery was then dissected, exposing the segmental arteries. This included the posterior apical, lingular, superior segmental, anterior basilar, posterior basilar, and lateral basilar arteries. The lateral basilar artery was divided, followed by division of the lateral basilar bronchus and vein. Indocyanine green (ICG) was used to assist in delineation of the S9 segment. Intraoperative frozen section analysis showed the nodule was 7 mm from the anterior staple line, and an additional wedge resection was performed along the anterior basilar segment. Final pathology demonstrated minimally invasive lung adenocarcinoma in a background of adenocarcinoma in situ and zero out of six lymph nodes were positive after sampling of stations 5L, 7, 9L, 10L, 11L, and 13L. Final pathologic stage was T1a, N0, M0. The patient was seen for her postsurgical follow-up and was recovering appropriately with minimal worsening of her dyspnea symptoms. Reference(s) 1. Nomori H, Okada M. Illustrated Anatomical Segmentectomy for Lung Cancer. Springer; 2012. 2. Miyata Y, Okada M. Hybrid video-assisted thoracic surgery basilar (S9-10) segmentectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;23(1):73–7.</p

The Incidence of Node-Positive Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Sublobar Resection and the Role of Radiation in Its Management

Purpose: To identify the incidence, preoperative risk factors, and prognosis associated with pathologically positive lymph node (pN+) in patients undergoing a sub-lobar resection (SLR). Methods: This is a retrospective study using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2014 analyzing SLR excluding those with any preoperative chemotherapy and/or radiation, follow-up \u3c 3 months, stage IV disease, or \u3e 1 tumor nodule. Multivariable modeling (MVA) was used to determine factors associated with overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to determine preoperative risk factors for pN+ in patients having at least one node examined to assess radiation\u27s effect on OS in those patients with pN+ and to determine whether SLR was associated with inferior OS as compared to lobectomy for each nodal stage. Results: A total of 40,202 patients underwent SLR, but only 58.3% had one lymph node examined. Then, 2,615 individuals had pN+ which decreased progressively from 15.1% in 2004 to 8.9% in 2014 (N1, from 6.3 to 3.0%, and N2, from 8.4 to 5.9%). A lower risk of pN+ was noted for squamous cell carcinomas, bronchioloalveolar adenocarcinoma (BAC), adenocarcinomas, and right upper lobe locations. In the pN+ group, OS was worse without chemotherapy or radiation. Radiation was associated with a strong trend for OS in the entire pN+ group (p = 0.0647) which was largely due to the effects on those having N2 disease (p = 0.009) or R1 resections (p = 0.03), but not N1 involvement (p = 0.87). PSM noted that SLR was associated with an inferior OS as compared to lobectomy by nodal stage in the overall patient population and even for those with tumors \u3c 2 cm. Conclusion: pN+ incidence in SLRs has decreased over time. SLR was associated with inferior OS as compared to lobectomy by nodal stage. Radiation appears to improve the OS in patients undergoing SLR with pN+, especially in those with N2 nodal involvement and/or positive margins

The rates of second lung cancers and the survival of surgically-resected second primary lung cancers in patients undergoing resection of an initial primary lung cancer

BACKGROUND: The Lung Cancer Screening Trial demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and lung cancer specific survival (LCSS), likely due to finding early-stage NSCLC. The purpose of our investigation is to evaluate whether long-term surveillance strategies (4+ years after surgical resection of the initial lung cancer(1LC)) would be beneficial in NSCLC patients by assessing the rates of second lung cancers(2LC) and the OS/LCSS in patients undergoing definitive surgery in 1LC as compared to 2LC (\u3e48 months after 1LC) populations. METHODS: SEER13/18 database was reviewed for patients during 1998-2013. Log-rank tests were used to determine the OS/LCSS differences between the 1LC and 2LC in the entire surgical group(EG) and in those having an early-stage resectable tumors (ESR, tumors \u3c 4cm, node negative). Joinpoint analysis was used to determine rates of second cancers 4-10year after 1LC using SEER-9 during years 1985-2014. RESULTS: The rate of 2LCs was significantly less than all other second cancers until 2001 when the incidence of 2LCs increased sharply and became significantly greater than all other second cancers in females starting in year 2005 and in men starting in year 2010. OS/LCSS, adjusted for propensity score by using inverse probability weighting, demonstrated similar OS, but worse LCSS for 2LCs in the EG, but similar OS/LCSSs in the ESR group. CONCLUSION: Because the rate of 2LCs are increasing and because the OS/LCSS of the 1LC and 2LC are similar in early-stage lesions, we feel that continued surveillance of patients in order to find early-stage disease may be beneficial