New insights in gastroesophageal reflux, esophageal function and gastric emptying in relation to dysphagia before and after anti-reflux surgery in children.

This item is under embargo for a period of 12 months from the date of publication, in accordance with the publisher's policy.In children with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) disease refractory to pharmacological therapies, anti-reflux surgery (fundoplication) may be a treatment of last resort. The applicability of fundoplication has been hampered by the inability to predict which patient may benefit from surgery and which patient is likely to develop post-operative dysphagia. pH impedance measurement and conventional manometry are unable to predict dysphagia, while the role of gastric emptying remains poorly understood. Recent data suggest that the selection of patients who will benefit from surgery might be enhanced by automated impedance manometry pressure-flow analysis (AIM) analysis, which relates bolus movement and pressure generation within the esophageal lumen

Esophageal impedance baselines in infants before and after placebo and proton pump inhibitor therapy

Author version made available in accordance with the publisher's policy.ABSTRACT Background Esophageal impedance monitoring records changes in conductivity. During esophageal rest impedance baseline values may represent mucosal integrity. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of acid suppression on impedance baselines in a placebo controlled setting. Material and Methods Impedance recordings from 40 infants (0-6months) enrolled in randomized placebo controlled trials of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) were retrospectively analyzed. Infants underwent 24hr pH-impedance monitoring prior to and after two weeks of double blind therapy with placebo or a PPI. Typical clinical signs of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) were recorded and I-GERQ-R questionnaire was completed. Key results Median (IQR) impedance baseline increased on PPI treatment (from 1217 (826-1514) to 1903 (1560-2194) Ohm, p<0.001) but not with placebo (from 1445 (1033-1791) to 1650 (1292-1983) Ohm, p=0.13). Baselines before treatment inversely correlate with the number of GER, acid GER, weakly acid GER, acid exposure and symptoms. The change in baseline on treatment inversely correlates with acid exposure and acid GER. Patients with initial low baselines have no improved symptomatic response to treatment. Conclusions and Inferences Impedance baselines are influenced by GER and increase significantly more with PPI therapy than with placebo. Clinical impact of this observation remains undefined as targeting therapy at infants with low baselines does not improve symptomatic response to treatment

Indications, methodology, and interpretation of combined esophageal impedance-ph monitoring in children: ESPGHAN euro-pig standard protocol

AIM:: The aim of the study was to provide an updated position statement from the ESPGHAN European Pediatric Impedance Working Group on different technical aspects such as indications, methodology, and interpretation of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH). METHODS:: Evidence was used where available, but the article is based mainly on expert opinion and consensus. RESULTS:: MII-pH provides more information than simple pH monitoring because reflux detection is not limited to acid reflux. Different companies provide commercialized MII-pH recording systems, making the method widely available and useable in daily clinical practice; however, the technique still has limitations: high cost, limited additional value regarding therapeutic implications, and lack of evidence-based parameters for the assessment of gastroesophageal reflux and symptom association in children. CONCLUSIONS:: MII-pH recording is a promising procedure needing further validation and development to increase its additional benefit over conventional investigation techniques. The added value of the technique regards mainly clinical circumstances in which nonacid or weakly acid reflux may be relevant such as persisting symptoms during antireflux treatment with proton pump inhibitors and feeding-related reflux; and assessing specific discontinuous symptoms thought to be associated with gastroesophageal reflux; and research. Copyright \ua9 2012 by European Society

Esophageal acid exposure decreases intraluminal baseline impedance levels

Intraluminal baseline impedance levels are determined by the conductivity of the esophageal wall and can be decreased in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the baseline impedance in GERD patients, on and off proton pump inhibitor (PPI), and in healthy controls. Ambulatory 24-h pH-impedance monitoring was performed in (i) 24 GERD patients with and 24 without pathological esophageal acid exposure as well as in 10 healthy controls and in (ii) 20 patients with refractory GERD symptoms despite PPI, once on PPI and once off PPI. Baseline impedance levels in the most distal and the most proximal impedance channels were assessed. Median (interquartile range) distal baseline impedance in patients with physiological (2,090 (1,537-2,547) Ω) and pathological (781 (612-1,137) Ω) acid exposure was lower than in controls (2,827 (2,127-3,270) Ω, P <0.05 and P <0.001). A negative correlation between 24-h acid exposure time and baseline impedance was observed (r=-0.7, P <0.001). In patients measured off and on PPI, median distal baseline impedance off PPI was significantly lower than on PPI (886 (716-1,354) vs. 1,372 (961-1,955) Ω, P <0.05) and distal baseline impedance in these groups was significantly lower than in healthy controls (P <0.05 and P <0.001). Proximal baseline impedance did not differ significantly between the patients off PPI and on PPI (1,793 (1,384-2,489) vs. 1,893 (1,610-2,561) Ω); however, baseline impedance values in both measurements were significantly lower than in healthy controls (3,648 (2,815-3,932) Ω, both P <0.001). These findings suggest that baseline impedance is related to esophageal acid exposure and could be a marker of reflux-induced changes to the esophageal mucos

Outcomes of endoscopy and novel pH-impedance parameters in children: is there a correlation?

Objectives: Discordance exists between outcomes of endoscopy, multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring (pH-MII), MII baselines, and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. The aim of the present study was to determine the association between endoscopy, pH-MII and MII baselines, in children with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Methods: Endoscopies were graded for reflux esophagitis (RE). Biopsies of the distal esophagus were assessed for signs suggestive of esophagitis. Reflux index (RI), symptom association probability (SAP), number of reflux episodes, and mean baseline values were calculated. pH-MII was considered positive in children when RI was ≥3% and/or SAP was ≥95% and for infants when RI was ≥10% and/or SAP was ≥95%. Baselines were manually calculated and compared with an automated analysis. For MII baselines, patients were divided in 3 groups: normal endoscopy and negative overall pH-MII; normal endoscopy and an overall positive pH-MII; and RE. Results: A total of 26 children and 14 infants were included, median age: 26.5 months (2 months–16.2 years). Thirteen (32.5%) had RE. A significant negative association was found for RI and MII baselines (P = 0.009) and between SAP and RE (P = 0.039, odds ratio 1.018). MII baseline values were predictive for neither conventional pH-MII parameters nor RE. Manual analysis and automated calculation of MII baselines showed a perfect correlation. Distal MII baselines were significantly lower in children with a positive overall pH-MII outcome compared with the proximal esophagus (P = 0.049). No significant changes were found in baselines among the different groups 1 to 3. Conclusions: Acid-related parameters are significantly related to MII baselines. A perfect correlation between manual- and automated analysis of MII baselines was found. Large prospective studies are needed to confirm the exact role of endoscopy and MII baselines.Rachel J. van der Pol, Clara M. Loots, Laura Peeters, Yvan Vandenplas, Bruno Hauser, Thierry Devreker, Taher I. Omari, Marc A. Benninga, Michiel P. van Wij