5 research outputs found

    Persuasiveness in political discourse through the use of conceptual metaphors and modal means in English and Serbian Π£Π±Π΅Π΄ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π² политичСском дискурсС Ρ‡Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π· использованиС ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… срСдств Π² английском ΠΈ сСрбском языках

    Get PDF
    ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° Ρƒ ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌ Ρ€Π°Π΄Ρƒ јС пСрсуазивност Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠΌ дискурсу која сС ΠΎΡΡ‚Π²Π°Ρ€ΡƒΡ˜Π΅ ΡƒΠΏΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡ˜ΠΌΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ… ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€Π° ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ… срСдстава Ρƒ СнглСском ΠΈ српском Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΊΡƒ. ΠŸΠ΅Ρ€ΡΡƒΠ°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½Π° снага ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€Π° објашњава сС ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· Ρ‚Π΅ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ ΠΎ појмовним (ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»Π½ΠΈΠΌ) ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€Π°ΠΌΠ° Π›Π΅Ρ˜ΠΊΠΎΡ„Π° ΠΈ Џонсона ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΌΠ° којој сС Ρ‚Π²Ρ€Π΄ΠΈ Π΄Π° ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€Π΅ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΡƒΡ˜Ρƒ Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½ ΠΌΠΈΡˆΡ™Π΅ΡšΠ°, односно, ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Ρƒ Π½Π° Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ нашС рСалности. ΠŸΠ΅Ρ€ΡΡƒΠ°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ… срСдстава посматрамо Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΠΌ слоганима ΠΈ ΠΎΠ½Π° сС Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ˜Π΅ Ρƒ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ° Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΠΎΠ½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ модалности, Ρ‚Ρ˜. ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· Π΄ΠΈΡ€Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅, комисивнС ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅ исказС, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈ исказС способности. Овом ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΡƒ приступамо интСрдисциплинарно ΠΎΡΠ»Π°ΡšΠ°Ρ˜ΡƒΡ›ΠΈ сС Π½Π° Ρ‚Π΅ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ˜ΡΠΊΠ΅ постулатС ΠΈΠ· Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ… лингвистичких области – ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅ лингвистикС, ΠΏΡ€Π°Π³ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ΅, ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π³ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ΅, контрастивнС Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π΅, Π·Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΌ Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π΅ дискурса. Π£ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡšΡƒΡ˜Π΅ΠΌΠΎ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π» ΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ˜ΡƒΡ›ΠΈ Ρƒ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρƒ комплСксност пСрсуазивних Π½Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π° ΠΈ сва Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ° ΠΈ Π½Π΅Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ° срСдства која сС са истим Ρ†ΠΈΡ™Π΅ΠΌ користС. ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Π° која јС ΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡˆΡ›Π΅Π½Π° јС ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° ΠΊΠ²Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅. ΠšΠΎΡ€ΠΏΡƒΡΠ½Π° Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ’Π° ΠΎΠ±ΡƒΡ…Π²Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ»Π° јС тСкстовС Π½Π° СнглСском ΠΈ српском Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΊΡƒ ΠΎΠ±Ρ˜Π°Π²Ρ™Π΅Π½Π΅ Ρƒ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ ΠΎΠ΄ 2008. Π΄ΠΎ 2017. Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅ Ρƒ Π΄Π½Π΅Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ™Π½ΠΈΠΌ листовима Π½Π° српском ΠΈ СнглСском Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΊΡƒ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Ρ›Π°ΡšΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π° Ρƒ Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊΡƒ ΠΈΠ·Π±ΠΎΡ€Π½Π΅ кампањС ΠΈ нСпосрСдно Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ ΠΎΠ±Ρ˜Π°Π²Ρ™ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° ΠΈΠ·Π±ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΈΡ… Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚Π°. Π£ Π΅ΠΌΠΏΠΈΡ€ΠΈΡ˜ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π΄Π΅Π»Ρƒ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° нашлС су сС Π½Π°Ρ˜Ρ„Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ структурС, односно, Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠ³ јСзика Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠΌ дискурсу Π½Π° Π΄Π²Π° јСзика – српском ΠΈ СнглСском ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈ Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ слогани ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΡ˜Π° који ΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ˜Ρƒ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€. Π‘Π²ΠΈ издвојСни ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈ посматрани су ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ° срСдства са Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΈΠΌ пСрсуазивним ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΏΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»ΠΎΠΌ. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° су ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈ Π΄Π° сС пСрсуазивни Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚ ΠΈ пСрсуазивнС ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π³ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ° срСдства, Ρƒ нашСм ΡΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π°Ρ˜Ρƒ ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· појмовнС ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ исказС, постиТу Π½Π° исти ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ исти Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ Ρƒ српском, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΠΈ Ρƒ СнглСском Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΊΡƒ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ·Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌ Π½Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡƒΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅ΠΌ, односно, ΠΈΠ³Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡΠ°ΡšΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈ Π·Π°Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅ΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ™Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ°Π΄Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Ρ˜Π° ΠΈ наглашавањСм ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ™Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ°Π΄Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Ρ˜Π°, ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π²Ρ€Ρ’ΡƒΡ˜Π΅ сС Π΄Π° појмовнС ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€Π΅ ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Ρƒ Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ нашСг апстрактног искуства ΠΈ ΡƒΡΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π°Π²Π°Ρ˜Ρƒ нашС дСловањС ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠΏΠΈΡ˜Π΅Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΏΠΎΡ€ΡƒΠΊΠ°. ΠšΡ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ дискурснС Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ‚ слогана Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½Π΅ синтСзу свСукупнС ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡ€ΡƒΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ˜Ρƒ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΠΎΠ½Π°Π½Ρ‚Π½Ρƒ Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠΌ дискурсу, ΡˆΡ‚ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡ˜Π°Ρ‡Π°Π²Π° пСрсуазивни Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠ³ јСзика Ρƒ јСдном ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€Ρƒ са којим сС зајСдно ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρƒ Ρ˜Π°Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈ. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π²Ρ€Ρ’ΡƒΡ˜Π΅ΠΌΠΎ Π΄Π° пСрсуазивност постигнута Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΠΌ срСдствима прСдставља ΠΏΡ€Π²ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠ²ΠΎ Ρƒ ΡΡ‚Π²Π°Ρ€Π°ΡšΡƒ ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π΅ΡˆΠΊΠΎΠ³ вишСслојног пСрсуазивног Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Π° Π½Π° Π±ΠΈΡ€Π°Ρ‡ΠΊΠΎ Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΎ ΠΈ Π΄Π° сС сви остали Π²Π°Π½Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ ΡƒΠ±Π΅Ρ’ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ‡ΠΊΠΈ инструмСнти Π½Π° Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ само Π½Π°Π΄ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Ρ’ΡƒΡ˜Ρƒ.The subject of the thesis is persuasiveness in political discourse that is realized through the use of conceptual metaphors and modal means in English and Serbian. The persuasive power of metaphors is explained through the theory of the conceptual metaphors established by Lakoff and Johnson according to which metaphors shape the way we think or influence the way we conceptualize our reality. Persuasiveness of modal means is considered through political slogans and it is realized within the framework of dynamic and deontic modality, more precisely through directives, commissives, volitives and abilitives. In this research we take the interdisciplinary approach relying on theoretical postulates from different linguistic fields - cognitive linguistics, pragmatics, intercultural pragmatics, contrastive analysis, as well as rhetoric and critical discourse analysis. In the analysis, we apply an integrative model, considering the complexity of persuasive intentions and all the linguistic and non-linguistic means that are being used simultaneously for the same cause. The method we used was a combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis. The corpus included texts in English and Serbian published between 2008 and 2017 in daily and weekly newspapers in Serbian and English, as well as official address by political candidates during the election campaign and immediately after the election results were announced. The empirical part of the research included the most frequent metaphorical structures, that is, dominant examples of metaphorical language in political discourse in Serbian and English, as well as central political slogans of modal character. All the examples listed were observed as linguistic instruments with great persuasive and manipulative potential. The results of the research have shown that the persuasive effect and the persuasive strategies through linguistic means, i.e. through conceptual metaphors and modalized statements, are achieved in the same or almost the same way in both Serbian and English. The so-called intentional metaphorical framing, which refers to ignoring and neglecting unwanted content and emphasizing desirable content, confirms that conceptual metaphors influence the way we conceptualize our abstract experience and direct our actions as we receive political messages. Short modalized discourse forms such as slogans constitute a synthesis of the overall political message and have a resonant function in political discourse, further enhancing the persuasive effect of metaphorical language in one political speech with which they can co-occur. The results of the research confirm that the persuasiveness achieved by linguistic means is the first and the basic level in creating a strategic multilayered persuasive effect on the electorate and that all other nonlinguistic persuasive instruments are simply an upgrade to that basic linguistic level

    The Application of Experimental Design Methodology for the Investigation of Liquid Radioactive Waste Treatment

    Get PDF
    The sorption properties of waste facade, brick, and asphalt sample towards Sr(II), Co(II), and Ni(II) ions from single and multicomponent solutions were investigated. The highest sorption capacity was found for Ni(II) ions, while the most effective sorbent was facade. Simplex Centroid Mixture Design was used in order to investigate the sorption processes of ions from solutions with different composition as well as the competition between the cations. Based on the statistical analysis results, the equations for data modeling were proposed. According to the observations, the investigated solid matrices can be effectively used for the liquid radioactive waste treatment. Furthermore, the applied methodology turned out to be an easy and operational way for the investigations of multicomponent sorption processes

    Spolno-neovisna ekspresija izmjenjivača klora i mravlje kiseline Cfex (Slc26a6) u guőterači, tankom crijevu i jetri őtakora i poviőena ekspresija u bubrezima mužjaka

    Get PDF
    Chloride/formate exchanger (CFEX; SLC26A6) mediates oxalate transport in various mammalian organs. Studies in Cfex knockout mice indicated its possible role in development of male-dominant hyperoxaluria and oxalate urolithiasis. Rats provide an important model for studying this pathophysiological condition, but data on Cfex (rCfex) localisation and regulation in their organs are limited. Here we applied the RT-PCR and immunochemical methods to investigate rCfex mRNA and protein expression and regulation by sex hormones in the pancreas, small intestine, liver, and kidneys from intact prepubertal and adult as well as gonadectomised adult rats treated with sex hormones. rCfex cDNA-transfected HEK293 cells were used to confirm the specificity of the commercial anti-CFEX antibody. Various biochemical parameters were measured in 24-h urine collected in metabolic cages. rCfex mRNA and related protein expression varied in all tested organs. Sex-independent expression of the rCfex protein was detected in pancreatic intercalated ducts (apical domain), small intestinal enterocytes (brush-border membrane; duodenum > jejunum > ileum), and hepatocytes (canalicular membrane). In kidneys, the rCfex protein was immunolocalised to the proximal tubule brush-border with segment-specific pattern (S1=S2 jejunum > ileum) i kanalikularnoj membrani hepatocita. U bubrezima je a) prijenosnik rCfex imunolokaliziran u četkastoj membrani proksimalnih kanaliΔ‡a sa segment-specifičnim obrascem (S1=S2 ΕΎenke) zbog stimulacijskoga učinka androgena nakon puberteta. MeΔ‘utim, izlučivanje oksalata urinom nije bilo sukladno ekspresiji bubreΕΎnoga prijenosnika rCfex. Dakle, nejasan je učinak poviΕ‘ene ekspresije prijenosnika rCfex u proksimalnim kanaliΔ‡ima muΕΎjaka na izlučivanje oksalata, a postojanje prijenosnika u kanalikularnoj membrani hepatocita moguΔ‡i je put izlučivanja oksalata putem ΕΎuči

    Persuasiveness in political discourse through the use of conceptual metaphors and modal means in English and Serbian Π£Π±Π΅Π΄ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π² политичСском дискурсС Ρ‡Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π· использованиС ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… срСдств Π² английском ΠΈ сСрбском языках

    No full text
    ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° Ρƒ ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌ Ρ€Π°Π΄Ρƒ јС пСрсуазивност Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠΌ дискурсу која сС ΠΎΡΡ‚Π²Π°Ρ€ΡƒΡ˜Π΅ ΡƒΠΏΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡ˜ΠΌΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ… ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€Π° ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ… срСдстава Ρƒ СнглСском ΠΈ српском Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΊΡƒ. ΠŸΠ΅Ρ€ΡΡƒΠ°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½Π° снага ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€Π° објашњава сС ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· Ρ‚Π΅ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ ΠΎ појмовним (ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»Π½ΠΈΠΌ) ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€Π°ΠΌΠ° Π›Π΅Ρ˜ΠΊΠΎΡ„Π° ΠΈ Џонсона ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΌΠ° којој сС Ρ‚Π²Ρ€Π΄ΠΈ Π΄Π° ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€Π΅ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΡƒΡ˜Ρƒ Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½ ΠΌΠΈΡˆΡ™Π΅ΡšΠ°, односно, ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Ρƒ Π½Π° Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ нашС рСалности. ΠŸΠ΅Ρ€ΡΡƒΠ°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ… срСдстава посматрамо Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΠΌ слоганима ΠΈ ΠΎΠ½Π° сС Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ˜Π΅ Ρƒ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ° Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΠΎΠ½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ модалности, Ρ‚Ρ˜. ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· Π΄ΠΈΡ€Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅, комисивнС ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅ исказС, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈ исказС способности. Овом ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΡƒ приступамо интСрдисциплинарно ΠΎΡΠ»Π°ΡšΠ°Ρ˜ΡƒΡ›ΠΈ сС Π½Π° Ρ‚Π΅ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ˜ΡΠΊΠ΅ постулатС ΠΈΠ· Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ… лингвистичких области – ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅ лингвистикС, ΠΏΡ€Π°Π³ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ΅, ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π³ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ΅, контрастивнС Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π΅, Π·Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΌ Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π΅ дискурса. Π£ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡšΡƒΡ˜Π΅ΠΌΠΎ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π» ΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ˜ΡƒΡ›ΠΈ Ρƒ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρƒ комплСксност пСрсуазивних Π½Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π° ΠΈ сва Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ° ΠΈ Π½Π΅Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ° срСдства која сС са истим Ρ†ΠΈΡ™Π΅ΠΌ користС. ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Π° која јС ΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡˆΡ›Π΅Π½Π° јС ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° ΠΊΠ²Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅. ΠšΠΎΡ€ΠΏΡƒΡΠ½Π° Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ’Π° ΠΎΠ±ΡƒΡ…Π²Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ»Π° јС тСкстовС Π½Π° СнглСском ΠΈ српском Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΊΡƒ ΠΎΠ±Ρ˜Π°Π²Ρ™Π΅Π½Π΅ Ρƒ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ ΠΎΠ΄ 2008. Π΄ΠΎ 2017. Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅ Ρƒ Π΄Π½Π΅Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ™Π½ΠΈΠΌ листовима Π½Π° српском ΠΈ СнглСском Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΊΡƒ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Ρ›Π°ΡšΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π° Ρƒ Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊΡƒ ΠΈΠ·Π±ΠΎΡ€Π½Π΅ кампањС ΠΈ нСпосрСдно Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ ΠΎΠ±Ρ˜Π°Π²Ρ™ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° ΠΈΠ·Π±ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΈΡ… Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚Π°. Π£ Π΅ΠΌΠΏΠΈΡ€ΠΈΡ˜ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π΄Π΅Π»Ρƒ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° нашлС су сС Π½Π°Ρ˜Ρ„Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ структурС, односно, Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠ³ јСзика Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠΌ дискурсу Π½Π° Π΄Π²Π° јСзика – српском ΠΈ СнглСском ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈ Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ слогани ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΡ˜Π° који ΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ˜Ρƒ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€. Π‘Π²ΠΈ издвојСни ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈ посматрани су ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ° срСдства са Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΈΠΌ пСрсуазивним ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΏΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»ΠΎΠΌ. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° су ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈ Π΄Π° сС пСрсуазивни Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚ ΠΈ пСрсуазивнС ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π³ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ° срСдства, Ρƒ нашСм ΡΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π°Ρ˜Ρƒ ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· појмовнС ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ исказС, постиТу Π½Π° исти ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ исти Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ Ρƒ српском, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΠΈ Ρƒ СнглСском Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΊΡƒ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ·Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌ Π½Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡƒΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅ΠΌ, односно, ΠΈΠ³Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡΠ°ΡšΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈ Π·Π°Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅ΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ™Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ°Π΄Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Ρ˜Π° ΠΈ наглашавањСм ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ™Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ°Π΄Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Ρ˜Π°, ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π²Ρ€Ρ’ΡƒΡ˜Π΅ сС Π΄Π° појмовнС ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€Π΅ ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Ρƒ Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ нашСг апстрактног искуства ΠΈ ΡƒΡΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π°Π²Π°Ρ˜Ρƒ нашС дСловањС ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠΏΠΈΡ˜Π΅Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΏΠΎΡ€ΡƒΠΊΠ°. ΠšΡ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ дискурснС Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ‚ слогана Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½Π΅ синтСзу свСукупнС ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡ€ΡƒΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ˜Ρƒ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΠΎΠ½Π°Π½Ρ‚Π½Ρƒ Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠΌ дискурсу, ΡˆΡ‚ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡ˜Π°Ρ‡Π°Π²Π° пСрсуазивни Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠ³ јСзика Ρƒ јСдном ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€Ρƒ са којим сС зајСдно ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρƒ Ρ˜Π°Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈ. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π²Ρ€Ρ’ΡƒΡ˜Π΅ΠΌΠΎ Π΄Π° пСрсуазивност постигнута Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΠΌ срСдствима прСдставља ΠΏΡ€Π²ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠ²ΠΎ Ρƒ ΡΡ‚Π²Π°Ρ€Π°ΡšΡƒ ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π΅ΡˆΠΊΠΎΠ³ вишСслојног пСрсуазивног Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Π° Π½Π° Π±ΠΈΡ€Π°Ρ‡ΠΊΠΎ Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΎ ΠΈ Π΄Π° сС сви остали Π²Π°Π½Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ ΡƒΠ±Π΅Ρ’ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ‡ΠΊΠΈ инструмСнти Π½Π° Ρ˜Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ само Π½Π°Π΄ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Ρ’ΡƒΡ˜Ρƒ.The subject of the thesis is persuasiveness in political discourse that is realized through the use of conceptual metaphors and modal means in English and Serbian. The persuasive power of metaphors is explained through the theory of the conceptual metaphors established by Lakoff and Johnson according to which metaphors shape the way we think or influence the way we conceptualize our reality. Persuasiveness of modal means is considered through political slogans and it is realized within the framework of dynamic and deontic modality, more precisely through directives, commissives, volitives and abilitives. In this research we take the interdisciplinary approach relying on theoretical postulates from different linguistic fields - cognitive linguistics, pragmatics, intercultural pragmatics, contrastive analysis, as well as rhetoric and critical discourse analysis. In the analysis, we apply an integrative model, considering the complexity of persuasive intentions and all the linguistic and non-linguistic means that are being used simultaneously for the same cause. The method we used was a combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis. The corpus included texts in English and Serbian published between 2008 and 2017 in daily and weekly newspapers in Serbian and English, as well as official address by political candidates during the election campaign and immediately after the election results were announced. The empirical part of the research included the most frequent metaphorical structures, that is, dominant examples of metaphorical language in political discourse in Serbian and English, as well as central political slogans of modal character. All the examples listed were observed as linguistic instruments with great persuasive and manipulative potential. The results of the research have shown that the persuasive effect and the persuasive strategies through linguistic means, i.e. through conceptual metaphors and modalized statements, are achieved in the same or almost the same way in both Serbian and English. The so-called intentional metaphorical framing, which refers to ignoring and neglecting unwanted content and emphasizing desirable content, confirms that conceptual metaphors influence the way we conceptualize our abstract experience and direct our actions as we receive political messages. Short modalized discourse forms such as slogans constitute a synthesis of the overall political message and have a resonant function in political discourse, further enhancing the persuasive effect of metaphorical language in one political speech with which they can co-occur. The results of the research confirm that the persuasiveness achieved by linguistic means is the first and the basic level in creating a strategic multilayered persuasive effect on the electorate and that all other nonlinguistic persuasive instruments are simply an upgrade to that basic linguistic level

    The application of experimental design methodology for the investigation of liquid radioactive waste treatment

    No full text
    The sorption properties of waste facade, brick, and asphalt sample towards Sr(II), Co(II), and Ni(II) ions from single and multicomponent solutions were investigated. The highest sorption capacity was found for Ni(II) ions, while the most effective sorbent was facade. Simplex Centroid Mixture Design was used in order to investigate the sorption processes of ions from solutions with different composition as well as the competition between the cations. Based on the statistical analysis results, the equations for data modeling were proposed. According to the observations, the investigated solid matrices can be effectively used for the liquid radioactive waste treatment. Furthermore, the applied methodology turned out to be an easy and operational way for the investigations of multicomponent sorption processes. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. III 43009 and Grant no. OI 171007
    corecore