Determinants of cardiac troponin T elevation in COPD exacerbation – a cross-sectional study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cardiac Troponin T (cTnT) elevation during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with increased mortality the first year after hospital discharge. The factors associated with cTnT elevation in COPD are not known.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>From our hospital's database, all patients admitted with COPD exacerbation in 2000–03 were identified. 441 had measurement of cTnT performed. Levels of cTnT ≥ 0.04 μg/l were considered elevated. Clinical and historical data were retrieved from patient records, hospital and laboratory databases. Odds ratios for cTnT elevation were calculated using logistic regression.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>120 patients (27%) had elevated cTnT levels. The covariates independently associated with elevated cTnT were increasing neutrophil count, creatinine concentration, heart rate and Cardiac Infarction Injury Score (CIIS), and decreasing hemoglobin concentration. The adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals in parentheses) for cTnT elevation were 1.52 (1.20–1.94) for a 5 × 10⁶/ml increase in neutrophils, 1.21 (1.12–1.32) for a 10 μmol/l increase in creatinine, 0.80 (0.69–0.92) for a 1 mg/dl increase in hemoglobin, 1.24 (1.09–1.42) for a 10 beats/minute increase in heart rate and 1.44 (1.15–1.82) for a 10 point increase in CIIS.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Multiple factors are associated with cTnT elevation, probably reflecting the wide panorama of comorbid conditions typically seen in COPD. The positive association between neutrophils and cTnT elevation is compatible with the concept that an exaggerated inflammatory response in COPD exacerbation may predispose for myocardial injury.</p

The European Respiratory Society study on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (EUROSCOP): recruitment methods and strategies

The European Respiratory Society's study on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (EUROSCOP) is a multicentre study performed initially in 12 countries to assess the effect of 3 years' treatment with inhaled corticosteroids on lung function decline in smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It aimed at recruiting 50 subjects in 50 European centres. This study discusses the most successful, countrywise, recruitment strategies, an important issue since many multicentre European studies may follow in the future. The total number of recruited subjects was 2147 in 39 participating centres. In total, at least 25 000 screening spirometries were performed, and about 80 000 hospital records were checked. The most effective way of recruiting subjects was to screen subjects by spirometry after mass media campaigns (eight out of nine countries). Others used workplace screenings and different types of population sura ey, and only a few centres successfully recruited participants by hospital records. Inclusion criteria were slightly changed upon low initial accrual rate. Initial surveys in one country, where 2405 subjects were screened by spirometry, gave an important indication for the change of the inclusion criteria. Extension of the upper age limit from 60 to 65 yr considerably improved recruitment, as did a change of the upper limit of FEV(1) from below 80% predicted normal to below 100% predicted normal, while maintaining the FEV(1)/VC ratio below 70%. A tremendous effort is needed to recruit individuals with preclinical COPD, but this is certainly feasible with adequate strategies adjusted to each country

Health-related quality of life in asthma studies. Can we combine data from different countries?

The aim was to compare health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with asthma from 4 countries, and to investigate the correlations between HRQL and clinical indices. 341 patients; 140 (Sweden), 54 (Norway), 65 (the Netherlands) and 82 (Greece) were treated with formoterol fumarate 4.5 mug or with terbutaline sulphate 0.5 mg for 12 weeks inhaled 'on demand' via Turbuhaler(R). The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and clinical indices were assessed. The mean baseline AQLQ overall scores in Sweden (4.97), in the Netherlands (5.04), in Norway (4.68) and in Greece (4.68) were in the same range, however, with a significant difference between the four countries (p = 0.038). When comparing AQLQ, activity limitation and symptoms domains, the differences between the countries were not statistically significant. The cross-sectional correlations between AQLQ overall score and the clinical indices were similar in all four countries. The magnitude of change in AQLQ was consistent with the other clinical variables. The correlations between change in AQLQ overall score and change in clinical indices were low to medium in all countries. In conclusion, the consistency of cross-sectional correlations between the AQLQ overall and clinical indices across countries supports the validity of translations of the AQLQ used in this study. There were differences in baseline values between the countries. The treatment response in AQLQ differed to the same extent as other clinical indices. When combining HRQL data from different countries, there might be cultural, gender and socio-economic differences, explaining different responses to treatment. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved