18 research outputs found

    Comparative analysis of weighted gene co-expression networks in human and mouse

    No full text
    <div><p>The application of complex network modeling to analyze large co-expression data sets has gained traction during the last decade. In particular, the use of the weighted gene co-expression network analysis framework has allowed an unbiased and systems-level investigation of genotype-phenotype relationships in a wide range of systems. Since mouse is an important model organism for biomedical research on human disease, it is of great interest to identify similarities and differences in the functional roles of human and mouse orthologous genes. Here, we develop a novel network comparison approach which we demonstrate by comparing two gene-expression data sets from a large number of human and mouse tissues. The method uses weighted topological overlap alongside the recently developed network-decomposition method of <i>s</i>-core analysis, which is suitable for making gene-centrality rankings for weighted networks. The aim is to identify globally central genes separately in the human and mouse networks. By comparing the ranked gene lists, we identify genes that display conserved or diverged centrality-characteristics across the networks. This framework only assumes a single threshold value that is chosen from a statistical analysis, and it may be applied to arbitrary network structures and edge-weight distributions, also outside the context of biology. When conducting the comparative network analysis, both within and across the two species, we find a clear pattern of enrichment of transcription factors, for the homeobox domain in particular, among the globally central genes. We also perform gene-ontology term enrichment analysis and look at disease-related genes for the separate networks as well as the network comparisons. We find that gene ontology terms related to regulation and development are generally enriched across the networks. In particular, the genes FOXE3, RHO, RUNX2, ALX3 and RARA, which are disease genes in either human or mouse, are on the top-10 list of globally central genes in the human and mouse networks.</p></div

    Node density plots of <i>u</i>(<i>S</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>S</i><sub>2</sub>) versus <i>t</i>(<i>S</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>S</i><sub>2</sub>) for comparisons between the <i>s</i>-core+ sequences in: (a) human all-tissues and brain networks, (b) mouse all-tissues and brain networks, (c) human and mouse all-tissues network and (d) human and mouse brain networks.

    No full text
    <p>The densities are given by their <i>z</i>-score value (see “<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0187611#sec026" target="_blank">Methods</a>”). There is a clear statistical over-representation of genes that are central in both <i>s</i>-core+ sequence <i>S</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>S</i><sub>2</sub> for (a), (b) and (c). The brain-networks comparison in (d) show no clear trend.</p

    Jaccard index <i>J</i>(<i>S</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>S</i><sub>2</sub>) as function of node subsets of <i>s</i>-core+ sequence <i>S</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>S</i><sub>2</sub> consisting of their <i>m</i> respective innermost nodes, for: (a) Human all-tissues and brain, (b) mouse all-tissues and brain, (c) human and mouse all-tissues and (d) human and mouse brain network comparisons.

    No full text
    <p>The dashed lines are the expectation value for <i>J</i>(<i>m</i>; <i>S</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>S</i><sub>2</sub>). Both within-species comparisons show large <i>J</i>-values for small <i>m</i>, while the within-species comparisons have a lesser extent of innermost core overlap.</p

    Enrichment of TFs for the all-tissues and brain comparison across species.

    No full text
    <p>The left column show (<i>H</i><sub><i>A</i></sub>, <i>M</i><sub><i>A</i></sub>) comparison, while the right compare (<i>H</i><sub><i>B</i></sub>, <i>M</i><sub><i>B</i></sub>). Note (d), comparison of human and mouse brain network. For the innermost 10% of the genes, KZNFs are enriched in the comparison sequence <i>u</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>(<i>H</i><sub><i>B</i></sub>, <i>M</i><sub><i>B</i></sub>). (e) Enrichment of KZNFs according to <i>u</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>(<i>M</i><sub><i>A</i></sub>, <i>H</i><sub><i>A</i></sub>), which contrasts with (d). The x-axis is displayed in descending order, since <i>r</i> is the number of innermost genes, meaning that <i>r</i>/<i>N</i> = 1 denote the entire gene set, while smaller <i>r</i>/<i>N</i> denote gene sets of increasing centrality.</p

    Relationship between <i>t</i>(<i>S</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>S</i><sub>2</sub>) and <i>u</i>(<i>S</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>S</i><sub>2</sub>) normalized according to the number of nodes <i>N</i> = <i>N</i><sub><i>S</i><sub>1</sub>∩<i>S</i><sub>2</sub></sub>.

    No full text
    <p>A node <i>i</i> must be within the gray, diamond-shaped area because of the limitations from Eqs (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0187611#pone.0187611.e006" target="_blank">2</a>) and (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0187611#pone.0187611.e007" target="_blank">3</a>). The dark gray areas contain nodes where: (A) and are large, i.e. the node is central in both <i>s</i>-core+ sequences 1 and 2. (B) is large, while is small, i.e. the node is central in <i>s</i>-core+ sequence 1 and peripheral in sequence 2. (C) is large, while is small, which is the opposite of the (B) criteria, i.e. the node is central in <i>s</i>-core+ sequence <i>S</i><sub>2</sub>, but peripheral in sequence <i>S</i><sub>1</sub>.</p

    <i>Tbx18</i> LOF in 12Gso/<i>Tbx18</i><sup><i>LacZ</i></sup> mutants leads to prostate abnormalities in adults.

    No full text
    <p>The anterior prostates of five week-old 12Gso/<i>Tbx18</i><sup><i>LacZ</i></sup> mutants include stromal hypertrophy and epithelial disorganization, as revealed by Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stains. Sectioned anterior prostates of 12Gso/<i>Tbx18</i><sup><i>LacZ</i></sup> mutants (panel A, with areas highlighted in black, blue, and white boxes shown at high resolution in B, E, F respectively) include distal regions with relatively normal morphology (B) indistinguishable from that of wild type littermates (C, D). However, the same sections of mutant prostates show significant stromal hypertrophy (E) and epithelial disorganization and lack a clear boundary between stromal and epithelial compartments (F) in regions proximal to the urethra. (G) Measurement of stromal thickness and numbers of nuclei within the stromal regions confirm that both measurements are significantly different in mutant proximal anterior prostates than in wild type littermate controls. S is stroma; E is epithelium. Scale bars correspond to 100μm in all panels.</p

    Immunohistochemical analysis with stromal and epithelial markers.

    No full text
    <p>We used immunohistochemistry to examine the distribution of stromal and epithelial markers in sections of 5 week-old (A-C) wild-type, (D-I) 12Gso/<i>Tbx18</i><sup><i>LacZ</i></sup>, and (J-L) PB-Cre4<sup><i>+</i></sup>; <i>Tbx18</i><sup><i>flox/flox</i></sup> anterior prostates. IHC was carried out on slides adjacent to those imaged in Figs <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0154413#pone.0154413.g003" target="_blank">3</a> and <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0154413#pone.0154413.g004" target="_blank">4</a> and include the same regions of the tissue. (A) Luminal epithelial cells stained with an antibody detecting Cytokeratins 8 and 18 (CK8/CK18, green) form a continuous layer on the apical surface of the epithelial compartment in wild type prostate and (D) in distal ductal regions with normal pathology in the 12Gso/<i>Tbx18</i><sup><i>LacZ</i></sup> compound heterozygotes. (B, E) Basal epithelial cells stained with Cytokeratin 5 (CK5, green) also stain similarly in the wild type and distal regions of the mutant ducts, forming a discontinuous layer between the apical and basement membrane. (G, H, J, K) In contrast, CK8/CK18 and CK5 staining is significantly reduced in the epithelial compartments of the proximal anterior prostate regions in both 12Gso/<i>Tbx18</i><sup><i>LacZ</i></sup> (G, H) and PB-Cre4<sup>+</sup>; <i>Tbx18</i><sup><i>flox/flox</i></sup> mice (J, K). SMA (red) was co-stained with the Cytokeratin markers to define the smooth muscle layer of the stroma in each section. (C, F) Smooth muscle cells, identified with SMA (red), and fibroblasts, stained with the VIM antibody (green) form apposed but separate layers around the epithelial compartments in wild type animals and in distal regions of normal histology in the anterior prostate of 12Gso/<i>Tbx18</i><sup><i>LacZ</i></sup> mice. (I, L) However, in both types of <i>Tbx18</i> mutants we found cells positive for both the VIM and SMA markers (arrow in Fig I, L), indicative of myofibroblasts. In addition, compared to wild type littermates (C), the mutant anterior lobes contained larger numbers of VIM+ cells (green; arrowheads in I, L). Scale bars correspond to 100μm.</p
    corecore