16 research outputs found

    Chest wall resection and reconstruction for tumors: Analysis of oncological and functional outcome

    Get PDF
    Background: Tumors of the chest wall have a large spectrum of well-assessed indications for resection. However, whether a reconstruction is required or not is not always clear. Complications after chest wall resection and reconstruction (CWRR) are described in literature and potentially severe. There is no evidence of how non-reconstructive management may influence the post-operative complication rate. Methods: A total of 71 patients underwent thoracic demolition for tumors between April 2000 and October 2016. The patients were divided into two groups based on pathological findings: group 1: primary chest wall tumors; group 2: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) invading the thoracic wall. They were then retrospectively analyzed by means of following criteria: TNM staging, histology, infiltration depth, 5-year survival, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse rate, R-0 resection, number of resected ribs, site of surgical resection and post-operative respiratory complications, flail chest, chronic pain, deformity of the chest wall and cosmetic results. Results: Five-year survival, OS, DFS and risk of relapse showed a significant correlation with the presence of free surgical margins in both groups. In group 2, another parameter which correlated to survival, risk of relapse and DFS was lymph-nodal status. Moreover, the risk of post-operative respiratory complications was directly correlated with non-reconstruction after demolition of the chest wall in certain topographical sites. Conclusions: free surgical margins are the main oncological prognostic factor in these patients. In patients who underwent resection of two or more ribs in a critical area, reconstruction of the bony thorax can significantly reduce the post-operative respiratory complication rate

    Multidisciplinary approach to chest wall resection and reconstruction for chest wall tumors, a single center experience

    No full text
    Background: Chest wall resection and reconstruction (CWRR) is quite challenging in surgery, due to evolution in techniques. Neoplasms of the chest wall, primary or secondary, have been considered inoperable for a long time. Thanks to evolving surgical techniques, reconstruction after extensive chest wall resection is possible with good functional and aesthetic results. Methods: In our single-center experience, seven cases of extensive CWRR for tumors were performed with a multidisciplinary approach by both thoracic and plastic surgeons. Patients have been retrospective analyzed. Results: Acceptable clinical and aesthetical results have been recorded, with a smooth post-operative course and a low rate of post-surgical complications. Two early complications and one late complication (asymptomatic bone allograft fracture on the site of the bar implant) were recorded. Neither postoperative deaths nor local recurrences were registered after a median follow-up period of 13 months. Conclusions: Surgical planning is most effective when it is tailored to the patient. Specifically, in the treatment of selected chest wall tumors, the multidisciplinary approach is considered mandatory when an extensive demolition is required. Indeed, here, the radical wide en-bloc resection can lead to good results provided that the extent of resection is not influenced by any anticipated problem in reconstruction

    Influence of Lung Parenchyma Surgical Manipulation on Circulating Free DNA

    Get PDF
    Objectives: Metastatic recurrence is the most frequent cause of death after surgical resection of lung cancer. Manipulation during surgery has been advocated as one of the causes contributing to promotion of spreading. Methods: We investigated if the detection of plasma circulating free DNA (cfDNA) is influenced by surgical manipulation in 25 lung cancer patients (17 males and eight females) undergoing complete resection; 20 health subjects formed the control group. Bloodstream levels of cfDNA were detected before surgery, one week and one month after surgery. Results: CfDNA levels measured preoperatively and in the control group were 23 07 ± 7 4 ng/mL and 7 5 ± 3 4 ng/mL respectively (p=0 0002); levels at one week and one month were 68 2 ± 36 2 ng/mL and 9 6 ± 3 1 ng/mL respectively. The difference between the three time points were statistically significant (preop vs. one week p=0 0006; one week vs. one month p=0 0003) with an increase in the first week and a strong decrease after one month. CfDNA levels at one month were not statistically different from those recorded in the control group. There was no correlation between preoperative cfDNA levels, tumour stage, grading and histology and patient demographics. No correlation was found between postoperative cfDNA, type of surgical procedure, histology and stage. After a median follow-up of 16 months no recurrence was detected. Conclusions: Surgical manipulation determines increased cfDNA levels in the early postoperative period; however, after one month they decrease within the normal range, at levels that are statistically comparable with healthy subjects

    iI myotomy plus diverticulopexy suitable for symptomatic Zenker's diverticula?

    No full text
    The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the outcome of myotomy plus diverticulopexy over short and long-terms. A prospectively collected consecutive series (2007–2017) of 37 patients undergoing myotomy plus diverticulopexy was analyzed for clinical condition, operative information, peri-operative events, and follow-up by means of interview and physical examination. Diverticulopexy was scheduled regardless of the diverticulum’s features and patient condition, other than operability. There was no choice or selection between possible treatment options. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively, at post-operative day 30 and after 1 year. Follow-up aimed at assessing the subjective condition following treatment. During the interview, patients were asked to self-assess their ability to swallow before and after surgery. No patient had peri-operative events, complications associated with the procedure, wound infection or impaired swallowing. All patients could start drinking the day after operation, could return to solid diet on post-operative day 2 and be discharged on post-operative days 3–4. Barium swallowing was not necessary before discharge. Full solid diet was resumed according to patient’s compliance from post-operative day 2 (some patients refused solid diet soon after the operation even if asymptomatic). Follow-up ranged between 1 and 8 years. No patient was lost at follow-up. No disease recurrence was observed. Finally, no patient needed or sought for a clinical examination between the follow-up calls. Patients reported at least 50% improvement of symptomatology after 1 year. Diverticulopexy appears to be clinically safe, methodologically reproducible, and an effective procedure; it avoids suturing and offers good outcome results along with high patient satisfaction

    Clinical application of dual-source CT in the evaluation of patients with lung cancer: correlation with perfusion scintigraphy and pulmonary function tests

    No full text
    This study was done to assess the diagnostic potential of dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) in the functional evaluation of lung cancer patients undergoing surgical resection. The CT data were compared with pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). All patients were evaluated with DSCT, scintigraphy and PFTs. The DSCT scan protocol was as follows: two tubes (80 and 140 kV; Care Dose protocol); 70 cc of contrast material (5 cc/s); 5- to 6-s scan time; 0.6 mm collimation. After the automatic calculation of lung perfusion with DSCT and quantification of air volumes and emphysema with dedicated software applications, the perfusional CT studies were compared with scintigraphy using a visual score for perfusion defects; CT air volumes and emphysema were compared with PFTs. The values of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of DSCT compared with perfusion scintigraphy as the reference standard were: 0.88, 0.84, 0.90, 0.93 and 0.88, respectively. The McNemar test did not identify significant differences either between the two imaging techniques (p=0.07) or between CT and PFTs (p=0.09). DSCT is a robust and promising technique that provides important and accurate information on lung function
    corecore