Individuals Dying of Overdoses Related to Pharmaceutical Opioids Differ from Individuals Dying of Overdoses Related to Other Substances: A Population-Based Register Study

Background: Pharmaceutical opioid (PO) overdose deaths have increased in many Western countries. There are indications that those dying from a PO overdose differ from those dying from other types of overdoses. These differences might pose a challenge as the majority of current preventive measures are tailored toward those with the characteristics of "conventional" overdose deaths. Objective: We investigated differences in the characteristics of persons who died from PO overdoses compared to all other overdoses. Material and methods: Using the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, we retrieved information on overdoses classified according to ICD-10 and identified PO overdoses (T40.2; T40.4) and all other overdoses (T40.X; T43.6) in 2010-2019. By linking data from nationwide registers, we analyzed data on opioid dispensations and the history of mental and behavioral disorders. 1,224 persons were registered with PO overdoses and 1,432 persons with other overdoses. Results: Persons in the PO overdose group were older and were more frequently women (35.0% vs. 20.5%) than persons with other overdoses. They had a higher prevalence of chronic pain (35.8% vs. 13.2%), history of cancer (8.1% vs. 1.8%), filled prescriptions of analgetic opioids more frequently the month before death (38.8% vs. 12.0%), and used threefold higher doses of prescribed opioids compared to individuals in all other overdose group (66 vs. 26 oral morphine equivalents/day). In the PO overdose group, oxycodone and fentanyl were more frequently dispensed, while codeine was more frequently dispensed in the other overdose groups. A lower proportion of those in the PO overdose group had recorded diagnoses of substance use disorders, schizophrenia, and hyperkinetic disorder compared to the other overdose groups. Conclusion: Persons dying from overdoses on POs often differ from the population targeted by existing prevention strategies, as they are more frequently older women with chronic pain and using high doses of prescription opioids.publishedVersio

Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Research questionnaires are not always translated appropriately before they are used in new temporal, cultural or linguistic settings. The results based on such instruments may therefore not accurately reflect what they are supposed to measure. This paper aims to illustrate the process and required steps involved in the cross-cultural adaptation of a research instrument using the adaptation process of an attitudinal instrument as an example.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A questionnaire was needed for the implementation of a study in Norway 2007. There was no appropriate instruments available in Norwegian, thus an Australian-English instrument was cross-culturally adapted.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The adaptation process included investigation of conceptual and item equivalence. Two forward and two back-translations were synthesized and compared by an expert committee. Thereafter the instrument was pretested and adjusted accordingly. The final questionnaire was administered to opioid maintenance treatment staff (n=140) and harm reduction staff (n=180). The overall response rate was 84%. The original instrument failed confirmatory analysis. Instead a new two-factor scale was identified and found valid in the new setting.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The failure of the original scale highlights the importance of adapting instruments to current research settings. It also emphasizes the importance of ensuring that concepts within an instrument are equal between the original and target language, time and context. If the described stages in the cross-cultural adaptation process had been omitted, the findings would have been misleading, even if presented with apparent precision. Thus, it is important to consider possible barriers when making a direct comparison between different nations, cultures and times.</p

Staff attitudes and the associations with treatment organisation, clinical practices and outcomes in opioid maintenance treatment

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) there are documented treatment differences both between countries and between OMT programmes. Some of these differences have been associated with staff attitudes. The aim of this study was to 1) assess if there were differences in staff attitudes within a national OMT programme, and 2) investigate the associations of staff attitudes with treatment organisation, clinical practices and outcomes.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This study was a cross-sectional multicentre study. Norwegian OMT staff (<it>n </it>= 140) were invited to participate in this study in 2007 using an instrument measuring attitudes towards OMT. The OMT programme comprised 14 regional centres. Data describing treatment organisation, clinical practices and patient outcomes in these centres were extracted from the annual OMT programme assessment 2007. Centres were divided into three groups based upon mean attitudinal scores and labelled; "rehabilitation-oriented", "harm reduction-oriented" and "intermediate" centres.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>All invited staff (<it>n </it>= 140) participated. Staff attitudes differed between the centres. "Rehabilitation-oriented" centres had smaller caseloads, more frequent urine drug screening and increased case management (interdisciplinary meetings). In addition these centres had less drug use and more social rehabilitation among their patients in terms of long-term living arrangements, unemployment, and social security benefits as main income. "Intermediate" centres had the lowest treatment termination rate.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study identified marked variations in staff attitudes between the regional centres within a national OMT programme. These variations were associated with measurable differences in caseload, intensity of case management and patient outcomes.</p

Staff attitudes towards opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) and the associations with treatment

This thesis, in addiction medicine, investigated staff attitudes towards opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) in different settings, and their association with treatment differences within the Norwegian OMT programme. In New South Wales, Australian prison health staff were found to discourage inmates from entering or remaining in OMT. Thus, the first aim of this thesis was to investigate staff attitudes towards and knowledge of OMT among prison health staff. In Norway, annual assessments of the Norwegian OMT programme had identified treatment differences between the 14 regional OMT centres since 2004. There were some indications that these differences were associated with staff attitudes. The second aim of this thesis was to cross-culturally adapt the instrument used among Australian prison health staff into Norwegian and to assess Norwegian staff attitudes towards OMT. It also explored treatment differences within the Norwegian OMT programme and their possible associations with attitudes. The three studies had cross-sectional designs. The prison health staff study (n=396) was conducted in 2003 in NSW, Australia. The Norwegian attitudinal staff study was undertaken in 2007 in Oslo among 140 OMT staff and 180 harm reduction staff. The assessment of the Norwegian OMT programme used aggregated data from the annual OMT assessments from November 2007 and 2008. Australian prison health staff with little knowledge of methadone treatment were more likely to be abstinence-oriented. These staff were more likely to encourage inmates to leave the OMT programme prior to release from prison. In the Norwegian staff study there were differences between the regional OMT in attitudes towards OMT. Centres that were more likely to support discharge from treatment due to drug use and advocate limitations on who should have access to OMT had smaller caseloads, more frequent urine drug screening and increased case management. In addition less of their patients used drugs previous four weeks and more patients had long-term housing facilities and employment. These studies show that staff attitudes towards OMT are important factors that may influence treatment in many ways

Are overdoses treated by ambulance services an opportunity for additional interventions? A prospective cohort study

-To assess whether people who inject drugs (PWID) and who are treated for overdose by ambulance services have a greater mortality risk compared with other PWID, and to compare mortality risk within potentially critical time-periods (1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years) after an overdose attendance with the mortality risk within potentially non-critical time-periods (time before and/or after critical periods). A total of 172 PWID street-recruited in 1997 and followed-up until the end of 2004. Interview data linked to data from ambulance records, Norwegian Correctional Services, Opioid Substitution Treatment records and National Cause of Death Registry. Separate Cox regression models (one for each critical time-period) were estimated. Ambulance services treated 54% of the participants for an overdose during follow-up. The mortality rate was 2.8 per 100 person-years for those with an overdose and 3.3 for those without; the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.3 (95% CI = 0.6, 2.6, P = 0.482). Mortality risk was greater in all but the shortest critical time-period following ambulance attendance than in the non-critical periods. The mortality risk remained significantly elevated during critical periods, even when adjusted for total time spent in prison and substitution treatment. The HR ranged from 9.4 (95% CI = 3.5, 25.4) in the month after an overdose to 13.9 (95% CI = 6.4, 30.2) in the 5-year period. Mortality risk among people who inject drugs is significantly greater in time-periods after an overdose attendance than outside these time-periods

Are overdoses treated by ambulance services an opportunity for additional interventions? A prospective cohort study

To assess whether people who inject drugs (PWID) and who are treated for overdose by ambulance services have a greater mortality risk compared with other PWID, and to compare mortality risk within potentially critical time-periods (1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years) after an overdose attendance with the mortality risk within potentially non-critical time-periods (time before and/or after critical periods). A total of 172 PWID street-recruited in 1997 and followed-up until the end of 2004. Interview data linked to data from ambulance records, Norwegian Correctional Services, Opioid Substitution Treatment records and National Cause of Death Registry. Separate Cox regression models (one for each critical time-period) were estimated. Ambulance services treated 54% of the participants for an overdose during follow-up. The mortality rate was 2.8 per 100 person-years for those with an overdose and 3.3 for those without; the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.3 (95% CI = 0.6, 2.6, P = 0.482). Mortality risk was greater in all but the shortest critical time-period following ambulance attendance than in the non-critical periods. The mortality risk remained significantly elevated during critical periods, even when adjusted for total time spent in prison and substitution treatment. The HR ranged from 9.4 (95% CI = 3.5, 25.4) in the month after an overdose to 13.9 (95% CI = 6.4, 30.2) in the 5-year period. Mortality risk among people who inject drugs is significantly greater in time-periods after an overdose attendance than outside these time-periods

Naloxone distribution and possession following a large-scale naloxone programme

Aims: To examine uptake following a large‐scale naloxone programme by estimating distribution rates since programme initiation and the proportion among a sample of high‐risk individuals who had attended naloxone training, currently possessed or had used naloxone. We also estimated the likelihood of naloxone possession and use as a function of programme duration, individual descriptive and substance use indicators. Primary outcomes: naloxone possession and use. Random‐intercepts logistic regression models (covariates: male, age, homelessness/shelter use, overdose, incarceration, opioid maintenance treatment, income sources, substance use indicators, programme duration). Findings: Overall, 4631 naloxone nasal sprays were distributed in the two pilot cities, with a cumulative rate of 495 per 100 000 population. In the same two cities, among high‐risk individuals, 44% and 62% reported current naloxone possession. The possession rates of naloxone corresponded well to the duration of each participating city's distribution programme. Overall, in the six distributing cities, 58% reported naloxone training, 43% current possession and 15% naloxone use. The significant indicators for possession were programme duration [adjusted odds ratios (aOR) = 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI = 0.82–2.37], female gender (aOR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.20–3.24) and drug‐dealing (aOR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.42–3.93). The significant indicators for naloxone use were programme duration (aOR = 1.49 95%, CI = 1.15–1.92), homelessness/shelter use (aOR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.02–4.17), opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) (aOR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.13–3.78), drug‐dealing (aOR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.27–4.54) and heroin injecting (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.04–4.38). Conclusions: A large‐scale naloxone programme in seven Norwegian cities with a cumulative distribution rate of 495 per 100 000 population indicated good saturation in a sample of high‐risk individuals, with programme duration in each city as an important indicator for naloxone possession and use