Practical recommendations for fertility preservation in women by the FertiPROTEKT network. Part II: fertility preservation techniques.

PURPOSE In addition to guidelines focusing on scientific evidence, practical recommendations on fertility preservation are also needed. METHODS A selective literature search was performed based on the clinical and scientific experience of the authors. This article (Part II) focuses on fertility preservation techniques. Part I, also published in this journal, provides information on disease prognosis, disease-specific therapy, and risks for loss of fertility. RESULTS Ovarian stimulation including double stimulation and freezing of oocytes is the best-established therapy providing live birth chances in women < 35 years with high ovarian reserve of around 30-40%. Ovarian tissue freezing is especially useful in young women with good ovarian, if spontaneous conception is favoured and if < 1 week until chemotherapy is provided. Data on success rates are still limited, but this further evolving technique will possibly reach similar success rates as ovarian stimulation. GnRH agonists seem to reduce the risk of premature ovarian failure up to 50%; however, the effect is possibly not long-lasting. Ovarian transposition can easily be combined with freezing of ovarian tissue and is the preferred technique before pelvic radiotherapy. Other techniques, such as in vitro maturation, are limited to women with high ovarian reserve and remain less effective. In addition, procedures such as in vitro growth of follicles, etc. are still experimental. CONCLUSIONS Fertility preservation in women provides realistic chances of becoming pregnant. The choice of technique needs to be based on the time required, the woman's age, its risks and efficacy, and the individual preference of the patient

Serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration and follicle density throughout reproductive life and in different diseases-implications in fertility preservation.

STUDY QUESTION How do anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) serum concentrations and follicle densities (FDs) change with age and disease and what are the implications for fertility preservation? SUMMARY ANSWER AMH concentrations and FD do not correlate in young women, and AMH but not FD is reduced in some diseases, limiting the value of AMH as a predictive parameter of ovarian tissue transplantation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY AMH is widely used as a parameter to estimate the ovarian reserve. However, the reliability of AMH to predict total number of follicles and the FD is questionable. Women with lymphoma and leukaemia have been shown to have reduced AMH concentrations, but it is unknown if the FD is also reduced. In fertility preservation it is essential to estimate the correct total number of follicles and the FD, as ovarian tissue should only be cryopreserved if ovarian reserve is high. Furthermore, the amount of tissue to be transplanted should be based on the estimation of the real FD. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective observational study included 830 women (mean ± SD age, 28.2 ± 6.81 years; range, 4-43 years) with malignant (n = 806) and benign (n = 24) diseases who cryopreserved tissue in a single centre as part of a national fertility preservation programme. Females with ovarian surgery or known predispositions for a reduced ovarian reserve were excluded. AMH concentrations and FD were evaluated from March 2011 to September 2016. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS AMH concentrations were analysed before gonadotoxic therapies. Standardized biopsies, obtained from different areas of ovarian cortex, were collected. FD was analysed after tissue digestion and calcein staining and was expressed as average number of primordial and primary follicles count per 3 mm biopsy and per cubic millimeter tissue. AMH concentrations and FD were analysed in relation to age and diagnosis group. Both parameters were age adjusted, and associations between the different diagnosis groups and AMH versus FD were assessed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Mean ± SD AMH concentration was 3.1 ± 2.81 g/ml, mean FD per 3 mm biopsy was 137 ± 173.9 and 19.4 ± 24.60 per mm3. Maximum AMH concentrations were found in children and teenagers at the age of 6-10 years (5.71 ng/ml) and in adults at the age of 21-25 years (3.33 ng/ml). FD was highest in young children up to an age of 15 years and decreased with increasing age. AMH and FD were not correlated in women ≤20 years and weakly to moderately correlated in women 21-40 years (r = 0.24-0.39). Age-adjusted correlations between AMH and FD were demonstrated in several diagnosis groups such as breast cancer, leukaemia, sarcoma, gastrointestinal cancer and gynaecological cancer but not in the groups exhibiting Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, cerebral cancer, other types of malignancies and other types of benign diseases. Further statistical analysis supported the finding that, in some diagnosis groups such as Hodgkin's lymphoma and in gynaecological cancer, AMH concentrations but not FDs are reduced, questioning the prognostic accuracy of AMH for the FD in these diseases. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Even though biopsies were taken from different sites, heterogenous distribution of follicles might have had some effect on the accuracy of the analysis. WIDER IMPLICATION OF THE FINDINGS AMH should be used with care to estimate the total ovarian reserve and FD of cancer patients in young women in some diseases. Therefore, calculating the amount of ovarian tissue to be transplanted based solely on AMH might be inaccurate whereas FD might be a better parameter. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study did not receive any exterior funding

Determinants of transplantation success with cryopreserved ovarian tissue: data from 196 women of the FertiPROTEKT network.

STUDY QUESTION What are the pregnancy and live birth rates for ovarian tissue transplantation and which factors are associated with the success rate? SUMMARY ANSWER Pregnancy and live birth rates per transplanted woman are 32.7% and 26.5% and success rate is associated with female age and first versus repeated transplantation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Live birth rates after ovarian tissue transplantations have been reported to be between around 24% and 41% per patient. Success rates seem to be negatively associated with increasing female age at the time of tissue cryopreservation and with pelvic radiation. Success rates are apparently not reduced after overnight transportation of ovarian tissue before freezing. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Registry analysis of 244 transplantations in 196 women, performed by 26 FertiPROTEKT network centres from 2007 to 2019 with follow-up till December 2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Orthotopic ovarian tissue transplantations were performed in 196 women, 191 with previous malignant and 5 with previous non-malignant diseases. Size of transplanting centres varied between 1 and 100 transplantations per centre (median: 2). Factors possibly associated with success rate such as female age, first and repeated transplantation, experience of the transplanting centre and overnight transportation of the ovarian tissue before freezing were analysed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Average age of all 196 transplanted women was 31.3 years (SD 5.2; range 17-44) at the time of cryopreservation of tissue and 35.9 years (SD 4.8; range 23-47) at the time of transplantation. Pregnancy rate was 30.6% (95% CI, 24.2-37.6%) per first transplantation and 32.7% (95% CI, 26.1-39.7%) per patient. Pregnancy rate was higher after first transplantation (30.6% (95% CI, 24.2-37.6%)) compared to second and subsequent transplantations (11.8% (95% CI, 3.3-27.5%)). Live birth rate per first transplantation was 25.0% (95% CI, 19.1-31.7%) and per patient 26.5% (95% CI, 20.5-33.3%). Success rate decreased with increasing age at the time of ovarian tissue freezing. Live birth rate was 28.2% (95% CI, 20.9-36.3%) in women 35 years. Pregnancy rates after first transplantation were higher in centres who had performed ≥10 transplantations (35.1%) compared to centres with <10 transplantation (25.4%) (P = 0.12). Corresponding live birth rates were 27.0% and 18.6%. Success rates were not different in women with and without overnight transportation of tissue before cryopreservation. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The data were drawn from a registry analysis. Data such as ovarian reserve and premature ovarian insufficiency were not available for all women. Data might be influenced by different follow-up policies of the centres. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The study reveals the high potential of ovarian tissue freezing and transplantation, but only if freezing is performed in younger women. The study suggests focus should be placed on the first and not on repeated transplantations. It also opens the discussion of whether transplantation should rather be performed by experienced centres. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No funding. No competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A

Efficacy of ovarian tissue cryopreservation in a major European center

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of cryopreservation and thawing of ovarian tissue from oncological patients opting for fertility preservation on ovarian tissue viability. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, the ovarian tissue viability before and after cryopreservation and thawing was measured for 25 newly diagnosed oncological patients who had their ovarian tissue cryopreserved. Outcome measures were follicle integrity (histology), follicle viability (Calcein viability assay), steroid hormone production (estradiol and progesterone production in vitro) and overall tissue viability (glucose uptake in vitro). This study was conducted at a Cryobank for storage of ovarian tissue in a university hospital. RESULTS: Cryopreserved/thawed ovarian tissue showed a decreased glucose uptake when compared to tissue that had not been cryopreserved. In addition, a diminished E2 and P4 production was observed after cryopreservation and thawing, despite the fact that numbers of viable follicles as determined by the Calcein viability assay were comparable. Histological examination revealed a higher percentage of degenerated follicles after cryopreservation and thawing. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and thawing impairs the viability of ovarian tissue in oncological patients opting for fertility preservation

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy by microarray analysis of polar bodies in advanced maternal age: A randomized clinical trial

STUDY QUESTION: Does preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) by comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) of the first and second polar body to select embryos for transfer increase the likelihood of a live birth within 1 year in advanced maternal age women aged 36-40 years planning an ICSI cycle, compared to ICSI without chromosome analysis? SUMMARY ANSWER: PGT-A by CCS in the first and second polar body to select euploid embryos for transfer does not substantially increase the live birth rate in women aged 36-40 years. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: PGT-A has been used widely to select embryos for transfer in ICSI treatment, with the aim of improving treatment effectiveness. Whether PGT-A improves ICSI outcomes and is beneficial to the patients has remained controversial. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a multinational, multicentre, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial with intention-to-treat analysis. Of 396 women enroled between June 2012 and December 2016, 205 were allocated to CCS of the first and second polar body (study group) as part of their ICSI treatment cycle and 191 were allocated to ICSI treatment without chromosome screening (control group). Block randomization was performed stratified for centre and age group. Participants and clinicians were blinded at the time of enrolment until the day after intervention. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Infertile couples in which the female partner was 36-40 years old and who were scheduled to undergo ICSI treatment were eligible. In those assigned to PGT-A, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis of the first and second polar bodies of the fertilized oocytes was performed using the 24sure array of Illumina. If in the first treatment cycle all oocytes were aneuploid, a second treatment with PB array CGH was offered. Participants in the control arm were planned for ICSI without PGT-A. Main exclusion criteria were three or more previous unsuccessful IVF or ICSI cycles, three or more clinical miscarriages, poor response or low ovarian reserve. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate after fresh or frozen embryo transfer recorded over 1 year after the start of the intervention. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of the 205 participants in the chromosome screening group, 50 (24%) had a live birth with intervention within 1 year, compared to 45 of the 191 in the group without intervention (24%), a difference of 0.83% (95% CI: −7.60 to 9.18%). There were significantly fewer participants in the chromosome screening group with a transfer (relative risk (RR) = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.74-0.89) and fewer with a miscarriage (RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.26-0.90). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The targeted sample size was not reached because of suboptimal recruitment; however, the included sample allowed a 90% power to detect the targeted increase. Cumulative outcome data were limited to 1 year. Only 11 patients out of 32 with exclusively aneuploid results underwent a second treatment cycle in the chromosome screening group. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The observation that the similarity in birth rates was achieved with fewer transfers, less cryopreservation and fewer miscarriages points to a clinical benefit of PGT-A, and this form of embryo selection may, therefore, be considered to minimize the number of interventions while producing comparable outcomes. Whether these benefits outweigh drawbacks such as the cost for the patient, the higher workload for the IVF lab and the potential effect on the children born after prolonged culture and/or cryopreservation remains to be shown. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Illumina provided microarrays and other consumables necessary for aCGH testing of polar bodies. M.B.&apos;s institution (UZBrussel) has received educational grants from IBSA, Ferring, Organon, Schering-Plough, Merck and Merck Belgium. M.B. has received consultancy and speakers&apos; fees from Organon, Serono Symposia and Merck. G.G. has received personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, Ferring, Merck-Serono, Finox, TEVA, IBSA, Glycotope, Abbott and Gedeon-Richter as well as personal fees from VitroLife, NMC Healthcare, ReprodWissen, BioSilu and ZIVA. W.V., C.S., P.M.B., V.G., G.A., M.D., T.E.G., L.G., G.Ka., G.Ko., J.L., M.C.M., M.P., A.S., M.T., K.V., J.G. and K.S. declare no conflict of interest. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy by Microarray Analysis of Polar Bodies in Advanced Maternal Age: A Randomized Clinical Trial

STUDY QUESTION: Does preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) by comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) of the first and second polar body to select embryos for transfer increase the likelihood of a live birth within 1 year in advanced maternal age women aged 36-40 years planning an ICSI cycle, compared to ICSI without chromosome analysis? SUMMARY ANSWER: PGT-A by CCS in the first and second polar body to select euploid embryos for transfer does not substantially increase the live birth rate in women aged 36-40 years. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: PGT-A has been used widely to select embryos for transfer in ICSI treatment, with the aim of improving treatment effectiveness. Whether PGT-A improves ICSI outcomes and is beneficial to the patients has remained controversial. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a multinational, multicentre, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial with intention-to-treat analysis. Of 396 women enroled between June 2012 and December 2016, 205 were allocated to CCS of the first and second polar body (study group) as part of their ICSI treatment cycle and 191 were allocated to ICSI treatment without chromosome screening (control group). Block randomization was performed stratified for centre and age group. Participants and clinicians were blinded at the time of enrolment until the day after intervention. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Infertile couples in which the female partner was 36-40 years old and who were scheduled to undergo ICSI treatment were eligible. In those assigned to PGT-A, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis of the first and second polar bodies of the fertilized oocytes was performed using the 24sure array of Illumina. If in the first treatment cycle all oocytes were aneuploid, a second treatment with PB array CGH was offered. Participants in the control arm were planned for ICSI without PGT-A. Main exclusion criteria were three or more previous unsuccessful IVF or ICSI cycles, three or more clinical miscarriages, poor response or low ovarian reserve. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate after fresh or frozen embryo transfer recorded over 1 year after the start of the intervention. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of the 205 participants in the chromosome screening group, 50 (24%) had a live birth with intervention within 1 year, compared to 45 of the 191 in the group without intervention (24%), a difference of 0.83% (95% CI: −7.60 to 9.18%). There were significantly fewer participants in the chromosome screening group with a transfer (relative risk (RR) = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.74-0.89) and fewer with a miscarriage (RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.26-0.90). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The targeted sample size was not reached because of suboptimal recruitment; however, the included sample allowed a 90% power to detect the targeted increase. Cumulative outcome data were limited to 1 year. Only 11 patients out of 32 with exclusively aneuploid results underwent a second treatment cycle in the chromosome screening group. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The observation that the similarity in birth rates was achieved with fewer transfers, less cryopreservation and fewer miscarriages points to a clinical benefit of PGT-A, and this form of embryo selection may, therefore, be considered to minimize the number of interventions while producing comparable outcomes. Whether these benefits outweigh drawbacks such as the cost for the patient, the higher workload for the IVF lab and the potential effect on the children born after prolonged culture and/or cryopreservation remains to be shown. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Illumina provided microarrays and other consumables necessary for aCGH testing of polar bodies. M.B.&apos;s institution (UZBrussel) has received educational grants from IBSA, Ferring, Organon, Schering-Plough, Merck and Merck Belgium. M.B. has received consultancy and speakers&apos; fees from Organon, Serono Symposia and Merck. G.G. has received personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, Ferring, Merck-Serono, Finox, TEVA, IBSA, Glycotope, Abbott and Gedeon-Richter as well as personal fees from VitroLife, NMC Healthcare, ReprodWissen, BioSilu and ZIVA. W.V., C.S., P.M.B., V.G., G.A., M.D., T.E.G., L.G., G.Ka., G.Ko., J.L., M.C.M., M.P., A.S., M.T., K.V., J.G. and K.S. declare no conflict of interest. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved