14 research outputs found

    Book Reviews

    Get PDF
    CONSTITUTIONAL BRICOLAGE. By Gerald Garvey. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971. Pp. xi, 160. 7.50. and ANTHROPOLOGY OF LAW. By Leopold Pospisil. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1971. Pp. xiii, 385. 12.95

    The Law of Intergovernmental Relations: IVHS Opportunities and Constraints

    Get PDF

    Neither Peace Nor Uniformity : Local Government in the Wisconsin Constitution

    Get PDF

    Local Government Autonomy

    Get PDF

    Book Reviews

    Get PDF
    HOW ARBITRATION WORKS (3rd Edition). By Frank Elkouri and Edna Asper Elkouri. Washington: Bureau of National Affairs, 1973. Pp. 797. 17.50.DEVIANCE−INSOVIETSOCIETY−CRIME,DELINQUENCYANDALCOHOLISM.ByWalterD.Connor.NewYork:ColumbiaUniversityPress.1972.Pp.327.17.50. DEVIANCE-IN SOVIET SOCIETY-CRIME, DELINQUENCY AND ALCOHOLISM. By Walter D. Connor. New York: Columbia University Press. 1972. Pp. 327. 12.50. LEGAL RIGHTS OF CHILDREN: STATUS, PROGRESS AND PROPOSALS. A Symposium of the Columbia Human Rights Law Review. Fairlawn: R. E. Burdick, Inc., 1973. Pp. 212. $9.00

    Book Reviews

    Get PDF
    THE MODERN SUPREME COURT. By Robert G. McCloskey. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972. Pp. x, 376. 3.95.RECORDS,COMPUTERS,ANDTHERIGHTSOFCITIZENS.Washington:UnitedStatesDepartmentofHealth,EducationandWelfare,1973.Pp.xxxv,346.3.95. RECORDS, COMPUTERS, AND THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS. Washington: United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1973. Pp. xxxv, 346. 2.35. CHINA\u27S PRACTICE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: SOME CASE STUDIES. Edited by Jerome Alan Cohen. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972, Pp. x, 417. 15.00.DETERRENCE:THELEGALTHREATINCRIMECONTROL.ByFranklinE.ZimringandGordonJ.Hawkins.Chicago:TheUniversityofChicagoPress,1973.Pp.xiv,376.15.00. DETERRENCE: THE LEGAL THREAT IN CRIME CONTROL. By Franklin E. Zimring and Gordon J. Hawkins. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973. Pp. xiv, 376. 13.50

    Transitoriness in cancer patients [Poster]

    No full text
    Problem and Purpose: Being diagnosed with cancer engenders a confrontation with the finitude of life (transitoriness), uncertainty and changes in locus of control. Transitoriness can be defined as a person’s confrontation with the finitude of human existence brought about by a terminal cancer diagnosis. It adversely influences patients’quality of life. Uncertainty negatively impacts quality of life; locus of control influences one’s level of anxiety and depression. A cancer diagnosis results in difficulty in envisioning a future after the cancer diagnosis, and influences subsequent ways of coping with the disease. Since the relationships between these concepts have only been studied in part, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) and lung cancer. Significance: Investigating these associations in cancer patients will enhance understanding of their coping. A targeted intervention to better support GI and lung cancer patients in their experience of transitoriness can then be developed. Methods and Analysis: With approval of the Institutional Review Board of a large teaching facility in the United States, a total of 126 patients with GI and lung cancer were enrolled. Demographic data, including information about symptoms and their spiritual perspective were obtained and patients completed five questionnaires assessing the levels of transitoriness, uncertainty, locus of control, and quality of life. Descriptive and correlation analyses were conducted using SPSS 9 and Stata Intercooled 9. Findings and Implications: Overall, the quality of life of the 126 patients was slightly lower than medium (Mean µ=41.56, Stan. Dev. sd=9.08) with medium levels of transitoriness (µ=75.65, sd=13.40), uncertainty (µ=87.31, sd=10.41), and locus of control (µ=17.09, sd=6.68). Significant inverse associations were found between uncertainty (r=-0.493, p=0.000), transitoriness (r=-0.536, p=0.000 for state; and r=-0.463, p=0.000 for trait), locus of control (r=-0251, p=0.005 for Form B; and r=0.182, p=0.042 for Form C) and quality of life. No differences were found across patients with differing types of cancer. Therefore, transitoriness, uncertainty, and locus of control are key issues to be considered in the care of GI and lung cancer patients
    corecore