119 research outputs found
Hybrid laparoendoscopic single-site surgery of upper urinary tract with the use of mini-laparoscopic instruments: cosmetic outcome and midterm oncological outcome
Different Nerve-Sparing Techniques during Radical Prostatectomy and Their Impact on Functional Outcomes
The purpose of this narrative review is to describe the different nerve-sparing techniques applied during radical prostatectomy and document their functional impact on postoperative outcomes.
We performed a PubMed search of the literature using the keywords “nerve-sparing”, “techniques”,
“prostatectomy” and “outcomes”. Other potentially eligible studies were retrieved using the reference
list of the included studies. Nerve-sparing techniques can be distinguished based on the fascial
planes of dissection (intrafascial, interfascial or extrafascial), the direction of dissection (retrograde or
antegrade), the timing of the neurovascular bundle dissection off the prostate (early vs. late release),
the use of cautery, the application of traction and the number of the neurovascular bundles which are
preserved. Despite this rough categorisation, many techniques have been developed which cannot be
integrated in one of the categories described above. Moreover, emerging technologies have entered
the nerve-sparing field, making its future even more promising. Bilateral nerve-sparing of maximal
extent, athermal dissection of the neurovascular bundles with avoidance of traction and utilization of
the correct planes remain the basic principles for achieving optimum functional outcomes. Given that
potency and continence outcomes after radical prostatectomy are multifactorial endpoints in addition
to the difficulty in their postoperative assessment and the well-documented discrepancy existing
in their definition, safe conclusions about the superiority of one technique over the other cannot be
easily drawn. Further studies, comparing the different nerve-sparing techniques, are necessary
Comments on the Extraperitoneal Approach for Standard Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: What Is Gained and What Is Lost
Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (LERP) is considered the standard care treatment option for the management of localized and locally advanced prostatic cancer (PCa) in many institutes worldwide. In this work, the main advantages and disadvantages of LERP approach are reviewed with regard to its outcomes, the complication management, the learning curve, and the extend of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). It is concluded that LERP demonstrates comparable cancer control, urinary continence, and potency outcomes with the open and the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, while offering advantages in complication management in comparison to the transperitoneal approach. Learning curve of LERP is considered long and stiff and significantly affects perioperative outcomes and morbidity, cancer control, and functional results. Thus, close mentoring especially in the beginning of the learning curve is advised. Finally, LERP still has a role in the limited or modified PLND offered in intermediate risk PCa patients
Laparoscopic nephrectomy for ex-vivo correction of renal artery aneurism and auto transplant
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Renal artery aneurism are a rare condition, with a prevalence of 0.09% of the population. The outcomes and clinical management of this patients depend on the presence of symptoms and subsequent risk of rupture. Most patients are managed by endovascular techniques, but difficult cases may present a challenge to urologists. METHODS: We present a case of a 35 year old female, history of high blood pressure with the diagnosis of a left renal artery aneurism with a diameter of 27 mm. The patient was evaluated by vascular surgery, was unsuitable for endovascular treatment and was submitted to a laparoscopic left nephrectomy with correction of the aneurism ex-vivo and the kidney was transplanted to the left iliac region.
RESULTS: Operative time was 150 minutes and the warm ischemia time was 160 seconds. Blood loss was estimated in 80 mL with a hematocrit drop of 2% post operative. Drainage and vesical catheter were removed at day 2 and 6 post-operative, respectively. Post operative creatinine clearance was comparable
to the pre operative (Post - 95 vs. Pre - 98 mL/min/1.73m2) The follow up is 15 months and the patients has a functioning kidney and had a normalization of the blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: In experienced centers, laparoscopic nephrectomy with subsequent autotransplantion can be a safe and effective option in the management of specific conditions. This case presents a possible way to treat renal artery aneurisms that
can’t be managed by endovascular procedures
Development Methodology of the Novel Endoscopic Stone Treatment Step 2/A Training/Assessment Curriculum and a Roadmap on Developing Hands-on Training Curriculums in Future: An International Collaborative Work by European Association of Urology Sections
Background: Basic simulation training in endourology was established with the endoscopic stone treatment step 1 (EST-s1), which is now recognized worldwide for training and examination. Following on from EST-s1, the endoscopic stone treatment step 2 (EST-s2) was started by the European Association of Urology (EAU) sections. Objective: We describe the methodology used in the development of EST-s2 assessment curriculum. Materials and Methods: The "full-life cycle curriculum development" template was followed for curriculum development, focusing on intermediate training of EST protocol with complex endourologic tasks. A cognitive task analysis (CTA) was run in accordance with EAU Urolithiasis guidelines. The protocol and its details underwent a first consensus by Delphi method with EAU Urolithiasis Section experts in March 2017. Once the outcome and metrics were decided, curriculum development was carried out. Purpose-built stones were developed, and simulator system requirement was defined. Preliminary testing was done in European Urology Residents Education Programme 2019 and in phase five the protocol was finalized with full tutor instruction sheet. Results: The EST-s2/A curriculum development took 38 months and involved EAU Uro-technology and urolithiasis sections with coordination from the European School of Urology training group. Starting from the initial CTA, a 1277-word revision with preliminary task description was produced. Nine intermediate skills were identified and included in the final training protocol. The training content and session evaluations were carried out by 26 experts and 16 final year trainees, respectively. Although the experts agreed that EST-s2/A protocol was well structured (96%), covered the complex endourologic maneuvers (92%), and was useful to optimize and improve hands-on-training (HoT) sessions (92%), the overall evaluation was scored 4.25/5 by trainees. Conclusion: We describe the development methodology for intermediate EST curriculum, which also provides a roadmap on developing other HoT protocols in future. Patients Summary: In this report we described the development of the novel intermediate training curriculum for EST, called EST-s2, which took 3 years of collaborative work inside the EAU. This article is aimed to strengthen the standards in curriculum development and clearly describe the background of this new EAU official endourology protocol
Critical appraisal of literature comparing minimally invasive extraperitoneal and transperitoneal radical prostatectomy:A systematic review and meta-analysis
Objectives: To systematically review studies comparing extraperitoneal (E-RP) and transperitoneal minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (T-RP). Methods: The systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in September 2015. Several databases were searched including Medline and Scopus. Only studies comparing E-RP and T-RP (either laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach) were evaluated. The follow-up of the included patients had to be â¥6 months. Results: In all, 1256 records were identified after the initial database search. Of these 20 studies (2580 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The hospital stay was significantly lower in the E-RP cohort, with a mean difference of â0.30 days (95% confidence interval [CI] â0.35, â0.24) for the laparoscopic group and 1.09 days (95% CI â1.47, â0.70) for the robotic group (P < 0.001). Early continence rates favoured the E-RP group, although this was statistically significant only in the laparoscopic group (odds ratio [OR] 2.52, 95% CI 1.72, 3.70; P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the E-RP and T-RP cohorts for 12-month continence rates for both the laparoscopic (OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.89, 2.69; P = 0.12) and robotic groups (OR 3.03, 95% CI 0.54, 16.85; P = 0.21). The overall complication and ileus rates were significantly lower in the E-RP cohort for both the laparoscopic and robotic groups. The symptomatic lymphocele rate favoured the T-RP cohort, although this was statistically significant only in the laparoscopic group (OR 8.69, 95% CI 1.60, 47.17; P = 0.01). Conclusion: This review suggests that the extraperitoneal approach is associated with a shorter hospital stay, lower overall complication rate, and earlier return to continence when compared to the transperitoneal approach. The transperitoneal approach has a lower lymphocele rate. Keywords: Extraperitoneal, Laparoscopy, Minimally invasive, Robotic, Transperitoneal, Prostatectom
7U-Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (7U-ThuLEP): description of the technique
Objective: To present a modification to the classical ThuLEP technique, called 7U-ThuLEP and to compare its clinical intra- and post-operative outcomes to those of conventional ThuLEP in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate with Thulium Fiber Laser (ThuFLEP). A retrospective single-center study
Purpose: The aim of the present, retrospective study was to describe our initial experience and early outcomes of Thulium Fiber Laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) with the use of the FiberDust™ (Quanta System, Samarate, Italy) in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia. Methods: From June 2022 to April 2023, all patients who underwent endoscopic enucleation of the prostate at Urology Department of the University Hospital of Patras were included. A single surgeon utilizing the same standardized operative technique performed all the surgeries. The primary endpoints included the uneventful completion of the operation, the surgical time and any minor or major complication observed intra- or post-operatively. Results: Twenty patients with benign prostate hyperplasia were treated with ThuFLEP. All the surgeries were completed successfully and uneventfully. The enucleation phase of the operation was completed in a mean time of 45 ± 9.1 min, while the average time needed for the morcellation was 17.65 ± 3.42 min. No significant complications were observed intra- or post-operatively. The average hemoglobin drop was calculated to be 0.94 ± 0.71 g/dL. Conclusions: All the operations were successfully and efficiently completed with the use of the FiberDust™ (Quanta System, Samarate, Italy) in ThuFLEP. Significant blood loss or major complications were not observed
- …