28 research outputs found

    Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018:hemodynamic monitoring and management

    Get PDF
    Hemodynamic management is a mainstay of patient care in the operating room and intensive care unit (ICU). In order to optimize patient treatment, researchers investigate monitoring technologies, cardiovascular (patho-) physiology, and hemodynamic treatment strategies. The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (JCMC) is a well-established and recognized platform for publishing research in this field. In this review, we highlight recent advancements and summarize selected papers published in the JCMC in 2018 related to hemodynamic monitoring and management

    Prevalence of survivor bias in observational studies on fresh frozen plasma: Erythrocyte ratios in trauma requiring massive transfusion

    No full text
    Observational studies on transfusion in trauma comparing high versus low plasma: erythrocyte ratio were prone to survivor bias because plasma administration typically started later than erythrocytes. Therefore, early deaths were categorized in the low plasma: erythrocyte group, whereas early survivors had a higher chance of receiving a higher ratio. When early deaths were excluded, however, a bias against higher ratio can be created. Survivor bias could be reduced by performing before-and-after studies or treating the plasma: erythrocyte ratio as a time-dependent covariate. We reviewed 26 studies on blood ratios in trauma. Fifteen of the studies were survivor bias-unlikely or biased against higher ratio; among them, 10 showed an association between higher ratio and improved survival, and five did not. Eleven studies that were judged survivor bias-prone favoring higher ratio suggested that a higher ratio was superior. Without randomized controlled trials controlling for survivor bias, the current available evidence supporting higher plasma: erythrocyte resuscitation is inconclusive

    Year in review in journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2014: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring

    No full text
    Hemodynamic instability is a common sign in critically ill patients and its importance has been increasingly recognized during the last 20 years. Indeed, It is now appreciated that an adequate hemodynamic monitoring associated to reactive vigorous therapy is able to decrease the present ominous prognostic sign. In this regard, the Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (JCMC) has become an ideal platform for publishing cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring-related research, as reflected by an increasing number of articles related to this topic and published in the recent years. To highlight this new progress, the journal decided to print a review on some papers published last year in the JCMC and related to cardiac output monitoring and cardiovascular functions

    Ability of the third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo software to track changes in cardiac output in cardiac surgery patients: a polar plot approach.

    No full text
    International audienceOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of the third-generation (3.01) of FloTrac/Vigileo monitor (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) to follow variations in cardiac output (∆CO) using the new polar plot approach. DESIGN: Prospective interventional study. SETTING: Single hospital university study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five patients referred for cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: CO was measured simultaneously by 3 to 5 bolus thermodilution (COtd measurements), using a pulmonary artery catheter and by arterial pulse contour analysis, using the FloTrac/Vigileo (COvi). Data were collected at eight time points: before incision, after sternotomy, before and after protamine sulfate infusion, at the start of sternal closure, at the end of surgery, on arrival to intensive care unit, and after a standardized volume expansion with 500 mL of hetastarch 6%. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One-hundred thirty-five pairs of CO data were collected; the mean bias of all CO measurements corrected for repeated measures was 0.2 L/min with limits of agreements of -3.3 L/min and +2.9 L/min. The percentage error was 66.5%. The polar plot analysis included 71 significant ∆CO and showed a mean polar angle of -3.4 degrees with 95% polar percentage error equivalent limits of -61 to 55; 69% of analysed data points fell within the 30-degree limits and provided a correct polar concordance rate. CONCLUSIONS: Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo software still lacks the accuracy to reliably detect changes in cardiac output (∆CO) in cardiac surgery. Improvements to FloTrac/Vigileo CO algorithm and software still are needed in this particular setting
    corecore