Impact of opioid-free analgesia on pain severity and patient satisfaction after discharge from surgery: multispecialty, prospective cohort study in 25 countries

Background: Balancing opioid stewardship and the need for adequate analgesia following discharge after surgery is challenging. This study aimed to compare the outcomes for patients discharged with opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after common surgical procedures.Methods: This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study collected data from patients undergoing common acute and elective general surgical, urological, gynaecological, and orthopaedic procedures. The primary outcomes were patient-reported time in severe pain measured on a numerical analogue scale from 0 to 100% and patient-reported satisfaction with pain relief during the first week following discharge. Data were collected by in-hospital chart review and patient telephone interview 1 week after discharge.Results: The study recruited 4273 patients from 144 centres in 25 countries; 1311 patients (30.7%) were prescribed opioid analgesia at discharge. Patients reported being in severe pain for 10 (i.q.r. 1-30)% of the first week after discharge and rated satisfaction with analgesia as 90 (i.q.r. 80-100) of 100. After adjustment for confounders, opioid analgesia on discharge was independently associated with increased pain severity (risk ratio 1.52, 95% c.i. 1.31 to 1.76; P < 0.001) and re-presentation to healthcare providers owing to side-effects of medication (OR 2.38, 95% c.i. 1.36 to 4.17; P = 0.004), but not with satisfaction with analgesia (beta coefficient 0.92, 95% c.i. -1.52 to 3.36; P = 0.468) compared with opioid-free analgesia. Although opioid prescribing varied greatly between high-income and low- and middle-income countries, patient-reported outcomes did not.Conclusion: Opioid analgesia prescription on surgical discharge is associated with a higher risk of re-presentation owing to side-effects of medication and increased patient-reported pain, but not with changes in patient-reported satisfaction. Opioid-free discharge analgesia should be adopted routinely

The immunomodulatory role of paracrine signalling factor VSIG4 in peritoneal metastases

Abstract Peritoneal metastasis (PM), the regional progression of intra-abdominal malignancies, is a common sequelae of colorectal cancer (CRC). Immunotherapy is slated to be effective in generating long-lasting anti-tumour response as it utilizes the specificity and memory of the immune system. In the tumour microenvironment, tumour associated macrophages (TAMs) are posited to create an anti-inflammatory pro-tumorigenic environment. In this paper, we aimed to identify immunomodulatory factors associated with colorectal PM (CPM). A publicly available colorectal single cell database (GSE183916) was analysed to identify possible immunological markers that are associated with the activation of macrophages in cancers. Immunohistochemical analysis for V-set and immunoglobin containing domain 4 (VSIG4) expression was performed on tumour microarrays (TMAs) of tumours of colorectal origin (n = 211). Expression of VSIG4 in cell-free ascites obtained from CPM patients (n = 39) was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). CD163-positive TAMs cluster expression was extracted from a publicly available single cell database and evaluated for the top 100 genes. From these macrophage-expressed genes, VSIG4, a membrane protein produced by the M2 macrophages, mediates the up-regulation of anti-inflammatory and down-regulation of pro-inflammatory macrophages, contributing to an overall anti-inflammatory state. CRC TMA IHC staining showed that low expression of VSIG4 in stromal tissues of primary CRC are associated with poor prognosis (p = 0.0226). CPM ascites also contained varying concentrations of VSIG4, which points to a possible role of VSIG4 in the ascites. The contribution of VSIG4 to CPM development can be further evaluated for its potential as an immunotherapeutic agent