20 research outputs found

    An Evaluation of Nutrient Sources to Onslow Bay, North Carolina

    Get PDF
    Hydrographic and current meter data from Onslow Bay, North Carolina, were examined to determine the relative importance of various nutrient sources. Upwelled Gulf Stream water is the major source of nutrients while rivers represent a minor, if not insignificant, source. In the summer during stratified conditions, the upwelled water penetrates across the shelf, but in the winter the upwelled water is restricted to the outer shelf. Nitrate flux across the 40 m isobath was calculated from continuous temperature and current records. Flux during the summer of 1976 was 2 ÎĽM m2 sec-1 which is considerably less than flux estimations for the Georgia shelf or Scotia shelf. In the climatic scale a cooler climate causing denser shelf water would decrease the nutrient flux into the Bay, while a warmer climate causing less dense shelf water would increase the flux of nutrients into central shelf water

    The ideal response of a Gulf of Mexico estuary plume to wind forcing: Its connection with salt flux and a Lagrangian view

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/95390/1/jgrc11924.pd

    On the Possibility of Non-Local and Local Oil Spills Striking the Shores of North Carolina and South Carolina

    Get PDF
    Oil spills, the releases of liquid petroleum hydrocarbons into the marine environment, have occurred in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) of the United States (U.S.A). However, no oil spills have ever affected the Eastern Atlantic Seaboard (EAS) of the U.S.A. Nonetheless, we demonstrate from data and numerical modeling that oil spills in the GOM have the potential to reach the U.S.A. EAS via a combination of atmospheric storms, major ocean currents and atmospheric wind driven surface currents. The basis for this hypothesis is that in August of 1987, a Karena Brevis toxin plant outbreak occurred in the GOM, and several weeks hence, showed up on the shores of North Carolina and South Carolina. We recreate that environmental scenario employing atmospheric and oceanic data from 1987, Sea Surface Temperature (SST) images, and via numerical modeling, that an atmospheric cold front, the combination of the Loop Current, the Florida Current, and Gulf Stream Frontal Filaments, created the pathways for the transport of K-Brevis plants from the Gulf to the U.S.A. EAS. Numerical model output of oil spill scenarios, both non-local in the GOM and local to the Carolinas, is presented to prove that this latter hypothesis has credibility and viability

    Winds and the orientation of a coastal plane estuary plume

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/95659/1/grl27359.pd

    The Columbia River Plume Study: Subtidal Variability in the Velocity and Salinity Fields

    Get PDF
    A comprehensive study of the strongly wind driven midlatitude buoyant plume from the Columbia River, located on the U.S. west coast, demonstrates that the plume has two basic structures during the fall/winter season, namely, a thin (~5~15 m), strongly stratified plume tending west to northwestward during periods of southward or light northward wind stress and a thicker (~10~40 m), weakly stratified plume tending northward and hugging the coast during periods of stronger northward stress. The plume and its velocity field respond nearly instantaneously to changes in wind speed or direction, and the wind fluctuations have timescales of 2-10 days. Frictional wind-driven currents cause the primarily unidirectional flow down the plume axis to veer to the right or left of the axis for northward or southward winds, respectively. Farther downstream, currents turn to parallel rather than cross salinity contours, consistent with a geostrophic balance. In particular, during periods when the plume is separated from the coast, currents tend to flow around the mound of fresher water. At distances exceeding about 20 km from the river mouth, the along-shelf depth-averaged flow over the inner to midshelf is linear, and depth-averaged acceleration is governed to lowest order by the difference between surface and bottom stress alone. In this region, along-shelf geostrophic buoyancy-driven currents at ~5 m (calculated from surface density) and along-shelf geostrophic wind-driven currents (computed from a depth-averaged linear model) are comparable in magnitude (~10-25 cm-1 )
    corecore