Investigating the effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on primary somatosensory cortex

Near-threshold tactile stimuli perception and somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold (STDT) are encoded in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and largely depend on alpha and beta S1 rhythm. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive neurophysiological technique that allows cortical rhythm modulation. We investigated the effects of tACS delivered over S1 at alpha, beta, and gamma frequencies on near-threshold tactile stimuli perception and STDT, as well as phase-dependent tACS effects on near-threshold tactile stimuli perception in healthy subjects. In separate sessions, we tested the effects of different tACS montages, and tACS at the individualised S1 μ-alpha frequency peak, on STDT and near-threshold tactile stimuli perception. We found that tACS applied over S1 at alpha, beta, and gamma frequencies did not modify STDT or near-threshold tactile stimuli perception. Moreover, we did not detect effects of tACS phase or montage. Finally, tACS did not modify near-threshold tactile stimuli perception and STDT even when delivered at the individualised μ-alpha frequency peak. Our study showed that tACS does not alter near-threshold tactile stimuli or STDT, possibly due to the inability of tACS to activate deep S1 layers. Future investigations may clarify tACS effects over S1 in patients with focal dystonia, whose pathophysiology implicates increased STDT

Plasticity Induced in the Human Spinal Cord by Focal Muscle Vibration

The spinal cord spinal cord has in the past been considered a hardwired system which responds to inputs in a stereotyped way. A growing body of data have instead demonstrated its ability to retain information and modify its effector capabilities, showing activity-dependent plasticity. Whereas, plasticity in the spinal cord is well documented after different forms of physical exercise, whether exogenous stimulation can induce similar changes is still a matter of debate. This issue is both of scientific and clinical relevance, since at least one form of stimulation, i.e., focal muscle vibration (fMV), is currently used as a treatment for spasticity. The aim of the present study was to assess whether fMV can induce plasticity at the SC level when applied to different muscles of the upper limb. Changes in different electrophysiological measures, such as H-reflex testing homonymous and heteronymous pathways, reciprocal inhibition and somatosensory evoked potentials were used as outcomes. We found that fMV was able to induce long-term depression-like plasticity in specific spinal cord circuits depending on the muscle vibrated. These findings helped understand the basic mechanisms underlying the effects of fMV and might help to develop more advanced stimulation protocols

Measuring latency distribution of transcallosal fibers using transcranial magnetic stimulation

Background: Neuroimaging technology is being developed to enable non-invasive mapping of the latency distribution of cortical projection pathways in white matter, and correlative clinical neurophysiological techniques would be valuable for mutual verification. Interhemispheric interaction through the corpus callosum can be measured with interhemispheric facilitation and inhibition using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Objective: To develop a method for determining the latency distribution of the transcallosal fibers with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Methods: We measured the precise time courses of interhemispheric facilitation and inhibition with a conditioning-test paired-pulse magnetic stimulation paradigm. The conditioning stimulus was applied to the right primary motor cortex and the test stimulus was applied to the left primary motor cortex. The interstimulus interval was set at 0.1 ms resolution. The proportions of transcallosal fibers with different conduction velocities were calculated by measuring the changes in magnitudes of interhemispheric facilitation and inhibition with interstimulus interval. Results: Both interhemispheric facilitation and inhibition increased with increment in interstimulus interval. The magnitude of interhemispheric facilitation was correlated with that of interhemispheric inhibition. The latency distribution of transcallosal fibers measured with interhemispheric facilitation was also correlated with that measured with interhemispheric inhibition. Conclusions: The data can be interpreted as latency distribution of transcallosal fibers. Interhemispheric interaction measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation is a promising technique to determine the latency distribution of the transcallosal fibers. Similar techniques could be developed for other cortical pathways

The effect of stimulation frequency on transcranial evoked potentials

Introduction - Transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked electroencephalography potentials (TEPs) have been used to study motor cortical excitability in healthy subjects and several neurological conditions. However, optimal recording parameters for TEPs are still debated. Stimulation rates could affect TEP amplitude due to plasticity effects, thus confounding the assessment of cortical excitability. We tested whether short interpulse intervals (IPIs) affect TEP amplitude.Methods - We investigated possible changes in TEP amplitude and global mean field amplitude (GMFA) obtained with stimulation of the primary motor cortex at IPIs of 1.1-1.4 s in a group of healthy subjects.Results - We found no differences in TEP amplitude or GMFA between the first, second and last third of trials.Discussion - Short IPIs do not affect TEP size and can be used without the risk of confounding effects due to short-term plasticity

Corrigendum: Plasticity Induced in the Human Spinal Cord by Focal Muscle Vibration

Corrigendum: Plasticity Induced in the Human Spinal Cord by Focal Muscle Vibration by Rocchi, L., Suppa, A., Leodori, G., Celletti, C., Camerota, F., Rothwell, J., et al. (2018). Front. Neurol. 9:935. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00935

Cerebellar continuous theta burst stimulation in essential tremor

The pathophysiological mechanisms of essential tremor (ET) are still not entirely clear. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the cerebello-thalamo-cortical connectivity in ET using the cerebellar continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) and possible effects on tremor and reaching movements. Sixteen patients with ET and 11 healthy subjects underwent two experimental sessions: (i) cTBS over the right cerebellar hemisphere (real cerebellar cTBS) and (ii) cTBS over the neck muscles (sham cerebellar cTBS). The two sessions were performed at least 1 week apart. The effects of real and sham cerebellar cTBS were quantified as excitability changes on contralateral primary motor cortex, as well as possible changes of postural tremor and reaching movements on the ipsilateral arm. Primary motor cortex excitability was assessed by recording the input/output curve of the motor-evoked potentials from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle. Tremor was rated clinically. Objective assessment of tremor and reaching movements was performed using kinematic techniques. Real cerebellar cTBS reduced the excitability in the contralateral primary motor cortex in healthy subjects though not in patients with ET. There was no significant change in tremor severity and reaching movements, as assessed by clinical examination or kinematic techniques, after real or sham cerebellar cTBS in patients with ET. Finally, there was no correlation between individual changes of M1 excitability and kinematic measures of tremor and reaching movement abnormalities in patients with ET. The results suggest that functional cerebello-thalamo-cortical connectivity tested by cTBS is abnormal in ET and that cerebellar cTBS does not ameliorate tremor in this condition

Is somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold a biomarker of disease progression in multiple sclerosis?

Temporal processing of tactile information can be neurophysiologically investigated by measuring the somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold (STDT), i.e. the shortest interval needed to recognize two consecutive stimuli as distinct in time. STDT depends on cortico-subcortical grey matter structures interplay, with a pivotal role of the primary somatosensory cortex and thalamus (Conte et al., 2020). We previously observed that STDT was impaired in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients (Rocchi et al., 2016) and that this abnormality was present even in patients with low disability and normal somatosensory evoked potentials latencies (Conte et al., 2020). In addition, we found that STDT correlated with clinical disability in MS patients and with thalamic volume as tested by magnetic resonance imaging (Conte et al., 2020). However, it is unknown whether STDT abnormalities in MS reflect a static phenomenon or parallel disease progression. The aim of the prese

Somatosensory temporal discrimination in essential tremor and isolated head and voice tremors.

The aim of this study was to investigate the somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold in patients with essential tremor (sporadic and familial) and to evaluate whether somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold values differ depending on the body parts involved by tremor. We also investigated the somatosensory temporal discrimination in patients with isolated voice tremor. We enrolled 61 patients with tremor: 48 patients with essential tremor (31 patients with upper limb tremor alone, nine patients with head tremor alone, and eight patients with upper limb plus head tremor; 22 patients with familial vs. 26 sporadic essential tremor), 13 patients with isolated voice tremor, and 45 healthy subjects. Somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold values were normal in patients with familial essential tremor, whereas they were higher in patients with sporadic essential tremor. When we classified patients according to tremor distribution, somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold values were normal in patients with upper limb tremor and abnormal only in patients with isolated head tremor. Temporal discrimination threshold values were also abnormal in patients with isolated voice tremor. Somatosensory temporal discrimination processing is normal in patients with familial as well as in patients with sporadic essential tremor involving the upper limbs. By contrast, somatosensory temporal discrimination is altered in patients with isolated head tremor and voice tremor. This study with somatosensory temporal discrimination suggests that isolated head and voice tremors might possibly be considered as separate clinical entities from essential tremor