Maintaining CD4/CD8 ratio and Th1-CTL subsets of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells in serum-free culture conditions

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells therapy is a promising strategy that significantly controlled the progress of cancer diseases. CAR-T cells could kill cancer cells through cellular immune response; therefore, CD8+ cytotoxic T cells are critical for CAR-T cell therapy. However, recent papers reported that CD4+ T helper cells were important for the response and maintenance of CAR-T cells in vivo. Here, we developed a serum-free CAR-T cell preparation process that maintained the T cell population and controlled the T cell subsets. The CD4+ and CD8+ T cell population in CAR-T cells were maintained at averagely 59.4 % and 34.6%, and the major T cell subsets were Th1 cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), implying the potentially high cellular immune response. To verifying whether the prepared CAR-T cells were exhausted, the expression of several immune checkpoint markers was determined. Of interest, only less than 20% of CAR-T cells at endpoint were PD-1+ or CTLA4+, but more than 40% of CAR-T cells at the endpoint were TIM-3+, implying most CAR-T cells were not exhausted. These CAR-T cells produced more than 1 ng/mL of IFN-γ in the response to the antigen. Altogether, CAR-T cells could be prepared in our serum-free process in the controlling of T cell subsets, leading to potential high therapeutic potency. Please click Additional Files below to see the full abstract

In vitro high expansion of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells in serum-free process conditions

Manufacturing process is an important and complex factor for preparing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells for therapy. Although serum was widely applied in the culture or expansion of T cells, the quality of serum could be varied from batch to batch, leading to the variation of T cell expansion and quality. In addition, the safety of pathogens from serum and Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (CMC) were required to be considered. To overcome the disadvantages of serum application in T cell culture, serum-free and xeno-free culture conditions were required. We intended to develop a rapid serum-free culture condition for the expansion of immune T cells ex vivo. In our optimized serum-free condition, CAR-T cells could be expanded to about 100-200 times to the initial cell number after 6-day culture and the cell viability of all specimens was above 98%. Of interest, the percentage of CAR+ population in all specimens was increases, and the T cell pollutions could be maintained at averagely about 35-40% of CD8+ T cells and averagely about 50-55% of CD4+ T cells after culture. Taken together, our conditions could be applied in the expansion of CAR-T cells for cell therapy to support the minimum requirement of blood or cell samples from patients and to maintain the T cell population. Please click Additional Files below to see the full abstract

The use of mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair and regeneration: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The management of articular cartilage defects presents many clinical challenges due to its avascular, aneural and alymphatic nature. Bone marrow stimulation techniques, such as microfracture, are the most frequently used method in clinical practice however the resulting mixed fibrocartilage tissue which is inferior to native hyaline cartilage. Other methods have shown promise but are far from perfect. There is an unmet need and growing interest in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering to improve the outcome for patients requiring cartilage repair. Many published reviews on cartilage repair only list human clinical trials, underestimating the wealth of basic sciences and animal studies that are precursors to future research. We therefore set out to perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the translation of stem cell therapy to explore what research had been carried out at each of the stages of translation from bench-top (in vitro), animal (pre-clinical) and human studies (clinical) and assemble an evidence-based cascade for the responsible introduction of stem cell therapy for cartilage defects. This review was conducted in accordance to PRISMA guidelines using CINHAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Knowledge databases from 1st January 1900 to 30th June 2015. In total, there were 2880 studies identified of which 252 studies were included for analysis (100 articles for in vitro studies, 111 studies for animal studies; and 31 studies for human studies). There was a huge variance in cell source in pre-clinical studies both of terms of animal used, location of harvest (fat, marrow, blood or synovium) and allogeneicity. The use of scaffolds, growth factors, number of cell passages and number of cells used was hugely heterogeneous. SHORT CONCLUSIONS: This review offers a comprehensive assessment of the evidence behind the translation of basic science to the clinical practice of cartilage repair. It has revealed a lack of connectivity between the in vitro, pre-clinical and human data and a patchwork quilt of synergistic evidence. Drivers for progress in this space are largely driven by patient demand, surgeon inquisition and a regulatory framework that is learning at the same pace as new developments take place

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1.

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field

Multiplatform Analysis of 12 Cancer Types Reveals Molecular Classification within and across Tissues of Origin

Recent genomic analyses of pathologically-defined tumor types identify “within-a-tissue” disease subtypes. However, the extent to which genomic signatures are shared across tissues is still unclear. We performed an integrative analysis using five genome-wide platforms and one proteomic platform on 3,527 specimens from 12 cancer types, revealing a unified classification into 11 major subtypes. Five subtypes were nearly identical to their tissue-of-origin counterparts, but several distinct cancer types were found to converge into common subtypes. Lung squamous, head & neck, and a subset of bladder cancers coalesced into one subtype typified by TP53 alterations, TP63 amplifications, and high expression of immune and proliferation pathway genes. Of note, bladder cancers split into three pan-cancer subtypes. The multi-platform classification, while correlated with tissue-of-origin, provides independent information for predicting clinical outcomes. All datasets are available for data-mining from a unified resource to support further biological discoveries and insights into novel therapeutic strategies

Retrospective evaluation of whole exome and genome mutation calls in 746 cancer samples

Funder: NCI U24CA211006Abstract: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) curated consensus somatic mutation calls using whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS), respectively. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, which aggregated whole genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumour types, we compare WES and WGS side-by-side from 746 TCGA samples, finding that ~80% of mutations overlap in covered exonic regions. We estimate that low variant allele fraction (VAF < 15%) and clonal heterogeneity contribute up to 68% of private WGS mutations and 71% of private WES mutations. We observe that ~30% of private WGS mutations trace to mutations identified by a single variant caller in WES consensus efforts. WGS captures both ~50% more variation in exonic regions and un-observed mutations in loci with variable GC-content. Together, our analysis highlights technological divergences between two reproducible somatic variant detection efforts