23 research outputs found

    Sympathoinhibition by atorvastatin in hypertensive patients.

    Get PDF
    Contains fulltext : 89086.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Experimental animal data suggest that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) might reduce enhanced sympathetic activity, a hallmark of hypertensive patients. This hypothesis was tested for the first time in patients with primary hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over design, a proof-of-principle trial was performed in 13 patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension, who were randomly assigned to a regimen of atorvastatin (80mg/day) for 3 weeks, followed by placebo for 3 weeks or to a regimen of placebo for 3 weeks, followed by atorvastatin (80mg/day) for 3 weeks. Microneurography was used at the end of each treatment period to measure sympathetic nervous system activity (muscle sympathetic nerve activity: MSNA). Heart rate variability (HRV) and plasma norepinephrine concentrations were also measured. Additionally, effects on blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were assessed by 24-h ambulatory BP measurement. Atorvastatin reduced postganglionic MSNA (atorvastatin 35.0+/-2.0 vs placebo: 39.2+/-1.5 bursts/min, P=0.008) and heart frequency corrected MSNA (atorvastatin: 58.5+/-2.0 vs placebo: 64.7+/-3.0 bursts/100 beats, P=0.02). Atorvastatin had no significant effect on plasma norepinephrine levels, HRV, BP or HR. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild to moderate hypertension, atorvastatin reduces postganglionic MSNA, which supports the hypothesis that HMG-CoA reductase plays a role in sympathetic nervous system activity

    Π‘ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ½Ρ–Π½Π³ Π΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΡ— Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·Ρ–Ρ—. Наукова заява Π•Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Ρ–Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ товариства

    No full text
    Hypertension may be the initial clinical presentation for at least 15 endocrine disorders. An accurate diagnosis of endocrine hypertension provides clinicians with the opportunity to render a surgical cure or to achieve an optimal clinical response with specific pharmacologic therapy. It is challenging for the clinician to know when and how to perform case-detection testing for all the endocrine disorders in which hypertension may be the presenting symptom. Herein, we review the different forms of endocrine hypertension, with a focus on prevalence, clinical presentation, guidance on when to perform case detection testing, and currently available case-detection tests.Hypertension affects 28.6% of adults in United States. In most, hypertension is primary (essential or idiopathic), but a subgroup of approximately 15% has secondary hypertension. More than 50% of children who present with hypertension have a secondary cause. In young adults (< 40 years old), the prevalence of secondary hypertension is approximately 30%. The secondary causes of hypertension include renal causes (e.g., renal parenchymal disease) and endocrine causes. Hypertension may be the initial clinical presentation many endocrine disorders: pheochromocytoma and sympathetic paraganglioma, primary aldosteronism, hyperdeoxycorticosteronism (congenital adrenal hyperplasia – 11b-hydroxylase deficiency, 17a-hydroxylase deficiency, deoxycorticosterone-producing tumor, primary cortisol resistance), cushing syndrome, apparent mineralocorticoid excess / 11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency, hyperparathyroidism, secondary hyperaldosteronism, renovascular hypertension, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, obstructive sleep apnea and others.Clinical context is important. For example, case detection for endocrine hypertension may not be clinically important in an older patient with multiple life-limiting comorbidities. However, screening for endocrine hypertension may be key to enhancing and prolonging life in most patients with hypertension, especially younger patients.ΠΡ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ гипСртСнзия ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Π±Ρ‹Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ клиничСским проявлСниСм, ΠΏΠΎ мСньшСй ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅, 15 эндокринных расстройств. Π’ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ· эндокринной Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΈ позволяСт клиницистам Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ хирургичСскоС Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡ‚ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ клиничСского ΠΎΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ‚Π° Π² Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ спСцифичСской фармакологичСской Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ. ΠšΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρƒ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ слСдуСт ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ исслСдованиС ΠΏΠΎ Π²Ρ‹ΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ случаСв всСх эндокринных Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Ρ… гипСртСнзия ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡ‚ΡŒΡΡ симптомом. Π’ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ рассмотрСны Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡ‹ эндокринной Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΈ с Π°ΠΊΡ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ Π½Π° Ρ€Π°ΡΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Ρƒ, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π½Ρ‹ Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° слСдуСт ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ исслСдования для выявлСния заболСвания, ΠΈ описаны ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ΡΡ Π² настоящСС врСмя диагностичСскиС тСсты.ΠΡ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ страдаСт 28,6% взрослого насСлСния БША. Π’ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡˆΠΈΠ½ΡΡ‚Π²Π΅ случаСв ΠΎΠ½Π° являСтся ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ (основной ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ идиопатичСской), Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ±Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ Ρƒ 15% ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² выявляСтся вторичная Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ гипСртСнзия. Π‘ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 50% Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ с Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡŽΡ‚ Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΡƒΡŽ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ½Ρƒ заболСвания. Π£ людСй ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ 40 Π»Π΅Ρ‚ Ρ€Π°ΡΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΈ составляСт ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π½ΠΎ 30%. Π’Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‚ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‡Π½Ρ‹Π΅ (Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€, ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π΅Π½Ρ…ΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ·Π½Ρ‹Π΅ заболСвания ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π΅ΠΊ) ΠΈ эндокринныС. ГипСртСнзия ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Π±Ρ‹Ρ‚ΡŒ Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ клиничСским проявлСниСм ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ… эндокринных расстройств: Ρ„Π΅ΠΎΡ…Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠΌΡ‹ ΠΈ симпатичСской ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Π³Π°Π½Π³Π»ΠΈΠΎΠΌΡ‹, ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π»ΡŒΠ΄ΠΎΡΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°, гипСрдСзоксикортикостСронизма (вроТдСнная гипСрплазия Π½Π°Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² – 11Ξ²-гидроксилазная Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ, 17Ξ±-гидроксилазная Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ, дСзоксикортикостСрон-ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΄ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰Π°Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΡŒ, пСрвичная Ρ€Π΅Π·ΠΈΡΡ‚Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ»Π°), синдрома ΠšΡƒΡˆΠΈΠ½Π³Π°, ΠΌΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·Π±Ρ‹Ρ‚ΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π΅Ρ€Π°Π»ΠΎΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ²/Π΄Π΅Ρ„ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡ‚Π° 11Ξ²-гидроксистСроиддСгидрогСназы, Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€Π΅ΠΎΠ·Π°, Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ΄ΠΎΡΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°, рСноваскулярной Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΈ, Π³ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΡ€Π΅ΠΎΠ·Π°, Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€Π΅ΠΎΠ·Π°, обструктивного апноэ сна ΠΈ Π΄Ρ€.Π‘ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡˆΠΎΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π΅Ρ‚ клиничСский контСкст заболСвания. НапримСр, выявлСниС случаСв эндокринной Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Π½Π΅ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΡŒ клиничСского значСния Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° с мноТСствСнными ΡΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ‚ΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΌΠΈ заболСваниями, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ качСство ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ. Однако скрининг Π½Π° ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π½ΡƒΡŽ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΡŽ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊ ΡƒΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΄Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡˆΠΈΠ½ΡΡ‚Π²Π° ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ, особСнно ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹Ρ….ΠΡ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π° гіпСртСнзія ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π±ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΊΠ»Ρ–Π½Ρ–Ρ‡Π½ΠΈΠΌ проявом Ρ‰ΠΎΠ½Π°ΠΉΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡˆΠ΅ 15 Π΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΈΡ… Ρ€ΠΎΠ·Π»Π°Π΄Ρ–Π². Π’ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Ρ–Π°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ· Π΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΡ— Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·Ρ–Ρ— дозволяє клініцистам здійснити Ρ…Ρ–Ρ€ΡƒΡ€Π³Ρ–Ρ‡Π½Π΅ лікування Π°Π±ΠΎ досягти ΠΎΠΏΡ‚ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡ— ΠΊΠ»Ρ–Π½Ρ–Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΡ— Π²Ρ–Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ–Π΄Ρ– ΠΏΡ–Π΄ час спСцифічної Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Ρ–Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΡ— Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΡ–Ρ—. ΠšΠ»Ρ–Π½Ρ–Ρ†ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρƒ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈ Ρ– як слід ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈ дослідТСння Ρ‰ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎ виявлСння Π²ΠΈΠΏΠ°Π΄ΠΊΡ–Π² усіхСндокринних ΠΏΠΎΡ€ΡƒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΡŒ, ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ яких гіпСртСнзія ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π±ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈ симптомом. Π£ Π΄Π°Π½Ρ–ΠΉ статті розглянуті Ρ€Ρ–Π·Π½Ρ– Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΈ Π΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΡ— Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·Ρ–Ρ— Π· наголосом Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΡˆΠΈΡ€Π΅Π½Ρ–ΡΡ‚ΡŒ Ρ– ΠΊΠ»Ρ–Π½Ρ–Ρ‡Π½Ρƒ ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Ρƒ, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΆ прСдставлСні Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†Ρ–Ρ— Ρ‰ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈ слід ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈ дослідТСння для виявлСння Π·Π°Ρ…Π²ΠΎΡ€ΡŽΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ, Ρ– описані наявні діагностичні тСсти.На Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρƒ Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·Ρ–ΡŽ страТдає 28,6% дорослого насСлСння БША. Π£ Π±Ρ–Π»ΡŒΡˆΠΎΡΡ‚Ρ– Π²ΠΈΠΏΠ°Π΄ΠΊΡ–Π² Π²ΠΎΠ½Π° Ρ” ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΡŽ (основною Π°Π±ΠΎ Ρ–Π΄Ρ–ΠΎΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡŽ), Π°Π»Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ±Π»ΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΎ Ρƒ 15% ΠΏΠ°Ρ†Ρ–Ρ”Π½Ρ‚Ρ–Π² Π²ΠΈΡΠ²Π»ΡΡ”Ρ‚ΡŒΡΡ Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π½Π° Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π° гіпСртСнзія. Понад 50% Π΄Ρ–Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ Π· Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡŽ Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·Ρ–Ρ”ΡŽ ΠΌΠ°ΡŽΡ‚ΡŒ Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π½Ρƒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ½Ρƒ Π·Π°Ρ…Π²ΠΎΡ€ΡŽΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ. Π£ людСй, ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΡˆΠΈΡ… Π·Π° 40 Ρ€ΠΎΠΊΡ–Π², ΠΏΠΎΡˆΠΈΡ€Π΅Π½Ρ–ΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΡ— Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·Ρ–Ρ— ΡΡ‚Π°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ±Π»ΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΎ 30%. Π’Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π½Ρ– ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡ— Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·Ρ–Ρ— Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡŒ Π½ΠΈΡ€ΠΊΠΎΠ²Ρ– (Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄, ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π΅Π½Ρ…Ρ–ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ·Π½Ρ– Π·Π°Ρ…Π²ΠΎΡ€ΡŽΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π½ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠΊ) Ρ‚Π° Π΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π½Ρ–. ГіпСртСнзія ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π±ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π°Ρ‚ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌ ΠΊΠ»Ρ–Π½Ρ–Ρ‡Π½ΠΈΠΌ проявом Π±Π°Π³Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠΎΡ… Π΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΈΡ… Ρ€ΠΎΠ·Π»Π°Π΄Ρ–Π²: Ρ„Π΅ΠΎΡ…Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠΌΠΈ Ρ– симпатичної ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Π³Π°Π½Π³Π»Ρ–ΠΎΠΌΠΈ, ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π»ΡŒΠ΄ΠΎΡΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ–Π·ΠΌΡƒ, гіпСрдСзоксикортикостСронізму (Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π° гіпСрплазія Π½Π°Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ€Π½ΠΈΠΊΡ–Π² – 11Ξ²-гідроксилазна Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π½Ρ–ΡΡ‚ΡŒ, 17Ξ±-гідроксилазна Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π½Ρ–ΡΡ‚ΡŒ, ΠΏΡƒΡ…Π»ΠΈΠ½Π°, Ρ‰ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΄ΡƒΠΊΡƒΡ” дСзоксикортикостСрон, ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΠ½Π½Π° Ρ€Π΅Π·ΠΈΡΡ‚Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π½Ρ–ΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ»Ρƒ), синдрому ΠšΡƒΡˆΠΈΠ½Π³Π°, уявного Π½Π°Π΄Π»ΠΈΡˆΠΊΡƒ ΠΌΡ–Π½Π΅Ρ€Π°Π»ΠΎΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡ—Π΄Ρ–Π² / Π΄Π΅Ρ„Ρ–Ρ†ΠΈΡ‚Ρƒ 11Ξ²-гідроксистСроїддСгідрогСнази, Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€Π΅ΠΎΠ·Ρƒ, Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ΄ΠΎΡΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ–Π·ΠΌΡƒ, рСноваскулярної Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·Ρ–Ρ—, Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΡ€Π΅ΠΎΠ·Ρƒ, Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€Π΅ΠΎΠ·Ρƒ, обструктивного Π°ΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ сну Ρ‚Π° Ρ–Π½.Π’Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ значСння ΠΌΠ°Ρ” ΠΊΠ»Ρ–Π½Ρ–Ρ‡Π½ΠΈΠΉ контСкст Π·Π°Ρ…Π²ΠΎΡ€ΡŽΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ. Наприклад, виявлСння Π²ΠΈΠΏΠ°Π΄ΠΊΡ–Π² Π΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΡ— Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·Ρ–Ρ— ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π½Π΅ ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Ρ–Π½Ρ–Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ значСння Π² Π»Ρ–Ρ‚Π½ΡŒΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†Ρ–Ρ”Π½Ρ‚Π° Π· числСнними супутніми Π·Π°Ρ…Π²ΠΎΡ€ΡŽΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ, які ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΡƒΡŽΡ‚ΡŒ ΡΠΊΡ–ΡΡ‚ΡŒ Тиття. Однак скринінг Π½Π° Π΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π½Ρƒ Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·Ρ–ΡŽ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ стати ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅ΠΌ Π΄ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Ρ–ΠΏΡˆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Ρ– продовТСння Тиття Π±Ρ–Π»ΡŒΡˆΠΎΡΡ‚Ρ– ΠΏΠ°Ρ†Ρ–Ρ”Π½Ρ‚Ρ–Π² Ρ–Π· Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡŽ Π³Ρ–ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·Ρ–Ρ”ΡŽ, особливо ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ…

    Patient characteristics do not predict the individual response to antihypertensive medication: A cross-over trial

    No full text
    Background. International guidelines on hypertension management do not agree on whether patient characteristics can be used for the first choice of treatment of uncomplicated essential hypertension. Objective. We wanted to identify predictive patient characteristics to the response of two different classes of antihypertensive drugs in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension in primary care. Methods. We conducted a prospective, open label, blinded endpoint cross-over trial in 120 patients with a new diagnosis of hypertension from 10 family practices. Patients received 4 weeks of 12.5 mgr hydrochlorothiazide once daily and 4 weeks of 80 mgr valsartan once daily, each followed by a 4-week washout. The sequence of drugs was randomized. Age, sex and menopausal state were recorded at run in and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure, office blood pressure, plasma renin concentration, NT-proBNP, potassium, estimated glomerular filtration rate, urinary albumin, body mass index and waist circumference at each regimen change. The difference in systolic blood pressure response between both study drugs, calculated from mean daytime ambulatory blood pressures, was the main outcome measure. Results. Ninety-eight patients (52% female; median age 53 years) were eligible for per-protocolanalysis. None of the studied variables were predictive for the difference in systolic blood pressure response. Individual systolic blood pressure responses ranged from an increase by 18 mmHg to a decrease of 39 mmHg. Conclusion. In a relevant group of primary care patients with newly diagnosed hypertension, we were unable to detect predictors of treatment response. This study rather supports the United States and European guidelines than the United Kingdom and Dutch guidelines on hypertension.This study was funded by the department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center and by an unconditional grant of Novartis to cover the material costs of the stud

    Interaction in COPD experiment (ICE): A hazardous combination of cigarette smoking and bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    No full text
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a highly prevalent disease, characterised by poorly reversible, obstructive airflow limitation. Alongside other comorbidities, COPD is associated with increased morbidity and mortality resulting from cardiovascular disease - mainly heart failure and ischemic heart disease. Both diseases share an important risk factor, namely, smoking. About 50% of COPD patients are active cigarette smokers. Bronchodilation is the cornerstone of pharmaceutical treatment for COPD symptoms, and half of all COPD patients use long-acting bronchodilating agents. Discussion about these agents is currently focusing on the association with overall mortality and morbidity in COPD patients, of cardiovascular origin in particular. Bronchodilation diminishes the hyperinflated state of the lung and facilitates the pulmonary deposition of cigarette smoke by deeper inhalation into the smaller airways. Smaller particles, as in smoke, tend to penetrate and depose more in these small airways. In addition, bronchodilation indeed increases carbon monoxide uptake in the lungs, an important gaseous compound of cigarette smoke. Since the number of cigarettes smoked is positively correlated to mortality from cardiac events, we therefore hypothesise that chronic bronchodilation increases cardiovascular disease and mortality in COPD patients who continue smoking by increasing pulmonary retention of pathogenic smoke constituents. Indeed, a recent meta-analysis is suggestive that long-acting anticholinergics might increase cardiovascular disease if patients exceed a certain number of cigarettes smoked. To demonstrate the fundamental mechanism of this pathogenic interaction we will perform a randomised placebo-controlled cross-over trial to investigate the effect of maximum bronchodilation on the retention of cigarette smoke constituents. In 40 moderate to severe COPD patients we measure the inhaled and exhaled amount of tar and nicotine, as well during maximum bronchodilation as during administration of placebo. The fraction of retention of tar and nicotine is subsequently calculated for both circumstances and analysed for association with bronchodilation. Further observational cohort studies or randomised clinical trials designed to monitor cardiovascular events may well evaluate the interaction. Since many patients are at risk for this possibly hazardous interaction, its relevance to our society and healthcare is potentially great. The implication will be that the urgency to quit smoking is intensified. Besides, chronic bronchodilation - specifically long-acting bronchodilators - needs to be discouraged in smoking COPD patients that refuse to quit

    Bronchodilation and smoking interaction in COPD: A cohort pilot study to assess cardiovascular risk

    No full text
    Background: Smoking and bronchodilator treatment are both extensively studied as key elements in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, little is known about whether or not these elements interact in terms of developing cardiovascular diseases in patients with COPD. Objectives: To explore to what extent the risk of developing ischemic cardiovascular disease in COPD patients is mediated by smoking status, use of bronchodilators and - specifically - their interaction. Methods: We performed an observational pilot study on a relatively healthy Dutch COPD cohort from a primary care diagnostic center database with full information on spirometry tests, smoking status, bronchodilator use and other prescribed medication. We defined first ischemic cardiovascular events as primary outcome, measured by first prescription of antiplatelet drugs and/or nitrates. Unadjusted analyses by Kaplan-Meier were followed by adjusted Cox' proportional hazards. Results: 845 COPD patients, totaling 2,169 observation years, were included in the analyses. We observed an increased risk for nonfatal ischemic cardiovascular events by smoking (adjusted HR = 3.58, p = 0.001) and a protective effect of bronchodilators (adjusted HR = 0.43, p = 0.01). Although the protective effect of bronchodilators appears to be substantially minimized in patients that persist in smoking, we could not statistically confirm a hazardous interaction between bronchodilators and smoking (HR 2.50, p = 0.21). Conclusion: Our study reveals bronchodilators may protect from ischemic cardiovascular events in a relatively 'healthy' COPD population. We did not confirm a hazardous interaction between bronchodilators and smoking, although we observed current smokers benefit substantially less from the protective effect of bronchodilators
    corecore