Hereditary cancer registries improve the care of patients with a genetic predisposition to cancer: contributions from the Dutch Lynch syndrome registry

The Dutch Hereditary Cancer Registry was established in 1985 with the support of the Ministry of Health (VWS). The aims of the registry are: (1) to promote the identification of families with hereditary cancer, (2) to encourage the participation in surveillance programs of individuals at high risk, (3) to ensure the continuity of lifelong surveillance examinations, and (4) to promote research, in particular the improvement of surveillance protocols. During its early days the registry provided assistance with family investigations and the collection of medical data, and recommended surveillance when a family fulfilled specific diagnostic criteria. Since 2000 the registry has focused on family follow-up, and ensuring the quality of surveillance programs and appropriate clinical management. Since its founding, the registry has identified over 10,000 high-risk individuals with a diverse array of hereditary cancer syndromes. All were encouraged to participate in prevention programmes. The registry has published a number of studies that evaluated the outcome of surveillance protocols for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Lynch syndrome, as well as in familial colorectal cancer. In 2006, evaluation of the effect of registration and colonoscopic surveillance on the mortality rate associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) showed that the policy led to a substantial decrease in the mortality rate associated with CRC. Following discovery of MMR gene defects, the first predictive model that could select families for genetic testing was published by the Leiden group. In addition, over the years the registry has produced many cancer risk studies that have helped to develop appropriate surveillance protocols. Hereditary cancer registries in general, and the Lynch syndrome registry in particular, play an important role in improving the clinical management of affected families.Hereditary cancer genetic

Seven new mutations in hMSH2, an HNPCC gene, identified by denaturing gradient-gel electrophoresis

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is a relatively common autosomal dominant cancer-susceptibility condition. The recent isolation of the DNA mismatch repair genes (hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1, and hPMS2) responsible for HNPCC has allowed the search for germ-line mutations in affected individuals. In this study we used denaturing gradient-gel electrophoresis to screen for mutations in the hMSH2 gene. Analysis of all the 16 exons of hMSH2, in 34 unrelated HNPCC kindreds, has revealed seven novel pathogenic germ-line mutations resulting in stop codons either directly or through frameshifts. Additionally, nucleotide substitutions giving rise to one missense, two silent, and one useful polymorphism have been identified. The proportion of families in which hMSH2 mutations were found is 21%. Although the spectrum of mutations spread at the hMSH2 gene among HNPCC patients appears extremely heterogeneous, we were not able to establish any correlation between the site of the individual mutations and the corresponding tumor spectrum. Our results indicate that, given the genomic size and organization of the hMSH2 gene and the heterogeneity of its mutation spectrum, a rapid and efficient mutation detection procedure is necessary for routine molecular diagnosis and presymptomatic detection of the disease in a clinical setu

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families not complying with the Amsterdam criteria show extremely low frequency of mismatch-repair-gene mutations.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is a common autosomal dominant cancer-susceptibility condition characterized by early onset colorectal cancer. Germ-line mutations in one of four DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1, or hPMS2, are known to cause HNPCC. Although many mutations in these genes have been found in HNPCC kindreds complying with the so-called Amsterdam criteria, little is known about the involvement of these genes in families not satisfying these criteria but showing clear-cut familial clustering of colorectal cancer and other cancers. Here, we applied denaturing gradient-gel electrophoresis to screen for hMSH2 and hMLH1 mutations in two sets of HNPCC families, one set comprising families strictly complying with the Amsterdam criteria and another set in which at least one of the criteria was not satisfied. Interestingly, hMSH2 and hMLH1 mutations were found in 49% of the kindreds fully complying with the Amsterdam criteria, whereas a disease-causing mutation could be identified in only 8% of the families in which the criteria were not satisfied fully. In correspondence with these findings, 4 of 6 colorectal tumors from patients belonging to kindreds meeting the criteria showed microsatellite instability, whereas only 3 of 11 tumors from the other set of families demonstrated this instability. Although the number of tumors included in the study admittedly is small, the frequencies of mutations in the MMR genes show obvious differences between the two clinical sets of families. These results also emphasize the practical importance of the Amsterdam criteria, which provide a valid clinical subdivision between families, on the basis of their chance of carrying an hMSH2 or an hMLH1 mutation, and which bear important consequences for genetic testing and counseling and for the management of colorectal cancer families

The value of screening and central registration of families with familial adenomatous polyposis. A study of 82 families in The Netherlands

In 1984 a national registry of families with familial adenomatous polyposis was set up in The Netherlands to promote screening in those families. Eight-two families had been registered by the end of 1988. Analysis of the pedigrees showed that 204 family members at risk had not yet been screened. The diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis was histologically confirmed in 230 patients. These patients were subdivided into two groups. Group A comprised patients with familial adenomatous polyposis referred because they were symptomatic, and Group B relatives of these patients who were found by screening to have familial adenomatous polyposis. The authors compared these groups with respect to the occurrence of colorectal carcinoma. Fifty-four patients were found to have a colorectal carcinoma at the time of diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis, i.e., 49 of the 104 patients in Group A (47 percent) and five of the 126 patients in Group B (4 percent). The average age at diagnosis of the 104 patients in Group A was 35 years (range, 13 to 66 years) and that of the 126 patients in Group B was 24 years (range, 8 to 59 years). By the age of 40 years, 90 percent of the patients in group B had been diagnosed. Late onset of familial adenomatous polyposis was found in four families. Endoscopy and/or radiography of the upper digestive tract were (was) performed in 44 of the 230 patients. Nineteen patients (43 percent) were found to have polyps in the stomach or duodenum, or both. In our series, only one patient died from cancer of the upper digestive tract (ampullary carcinoma). These results show conclusively that screening leads to the early detection of familial adenomatous polyposis. The value of a national registry is proved by the finding of many at-risk family members who had not previously been screened. Screening should start between the ages of 10 and 12 and should continue up to the age of 50. In the rare cases of families with an apparently late onset of familial adenomatous polyposis, screening should be continued up to age 60. More studies are needed to determine the natural history of polyps in the upper digestive trac

Characterization of familial non-BRCA1/2 breast tumors by loss of heterozygosity and immunophenotyping.

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: Since the identification of BRCA1 and BRCA2, there has been no major breast cancer susceptibility gene discovered by linkage analysis in breast cancer families. This has been attributed to the heterogeneous genetic basis for the families under study. Recent studies have indicated that breast tumors arising in women carrying a BRCA1 mutation have distinct histopathologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features. To a lesser extent, this is also true for breast tumors from BRCA2 carriers. This indicates that it might be possible to decrease the genetic heterogeneity among families in which BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been excluded with high certainty (BRCAx families) if distinct subgroups of BRCAx-related breast tumors could be identified. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis with at least one marker per chromosomal arm (65 markers) was used to characterize 100 breast tumors derived from 92 patients from 42 selected BRCAx families. In addition, the immunophenotype of 10 markers was compared with that of 31 BRCA1- and 21 BRCA2-related breast tumors. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The BRCAx-related tumors were characterized by more frequent LOH at 22q relative to sporadic breast cancer (P < 0.02), and differed significantly from BRCA1- and BRCA2-related tumors in their positivity for Bcl2. However, cluster analyses of the combined data (LOH and immunohistochemistry) did not result in subgroups that would allow meaningful subclassification of the families. On chromosomes 2, 3, 6, 12, 13, 21, and 22, we found markers at which LOH occurred significantly more frequent among the tumors from patients belonging to a single family than expected on the basis of overall LOH frequencies. Nonetheless, linkage analysis with markers for the corresponding regions on chromosomes 12, 21, and 22 did not reveal significant logarithm of the odds

A high proportion of novel mutations in BRCA1 with strong founder effects among Dutch and Belgian hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families

Contains fulltext : 25573.PDF (publisher's version ) (Open Access

A high proportion of novel mutations in BRCA1 with strong founder effects among Dutch and Belgian hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families

We have identified 79 mutations in BRCA1 in a set of 643 Dutch and 23 Belgian hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families collected either for research or for clinical diagnostic purposes. Twenty-eight distinct mutations have been observed, 18 of them not previously reported and 12 of them occurring more than once. Most conspicuously, a 2804delAA mutation has been found 19 times and has never been reported outside the Netherlands. A common haplotype spanning ≥375 kb could be identified for each of the nine examined recurrent mutations, indicating the presence of multiple BRCA1 founder mutations in the Dutch population. The 2804delAA mutation has been estimated to have originated ~32 generations ago. No specific breast or ovarian cancer phenotype could be assigned to any of the common mutations, and the ovarian cancer incidence among 18 families with the 2804delAA mutation was heterogeneous