A influência da memória operacional nas habilidades de compreensão de leitura em escolares de 4ª série Influence of working memory in reading comprehension in 4th grade students

OBJETIVOS: Investigar o papel da memória verbal e não-verbal, e do vocabulário expressivo na compreensão de leitura; avaliar as habilidades de memória e vocabulário em um grupo de crianças da 4ª série em relação ao desempenho de compreensão de leitura. MÉTODOS: Participaram do estudo 15 crianças com idades entre 9;11 anos e 11;4 anos. As crianças não possuíam queixas de perda auditiva, visual e/ou alterações neurológicas. Todos os sujeitos foram submetidos individualmente às avaliações de desempenho escolar, leitura, (decodificação, compreensão) vocabulário e memória operacional verbal e não-verbal. RESULTADOS: Houve correlação estatisticamente significante entre o conhecimento de vocabulário expressivo (r= 0,546, p= 0,035) e memória operacional verbal (r= -0,689, p=0,004) e o desempenho em compreensão neste grupo de crianças de 4ª. série de ensino fundamental, sem queixas de dificuldades escolares. Nem a memória não-verbal, nem a habilidade de decodificação de palavras influenciaram no desempenho em compreensão de leitura. CONCLUSÕES: O desempenho em vocabulário e a boa capacidade da memória operacional verbal foram fatores relevantes para garantir a compreensão de leitura nessa população.<br>PURPOSE: To investigate the role of verbal and non-verbal working memory and vocabulary levels in reading comprehension. The specific goals were to evaluate working memory abilities, vocabulary and reading skills in a group of fourth grade children and to estimate the relations between memory comprehension performances. METHODS: Participants were 15 children between 9:11 and 11:4 years old with no auditory, visual and/or neurological deficits. All subjects were tested individually for academic performance, reading (decoding and comprehension), vocabulary, and verbal and non-verbal memory. RESULTS: Vocabulary knowledge (r= 0,546, p= 0,035) and verbal working memory (r= -0,689, p=0,004) showed statistically significant correlations with performance in comprehension in this group of fourth grade children, with no school difficulties. Neither non-verbal working memory nor decoding skills influenced reading comprehension. CONCLUSION: The performance on vocabulary and the good ability of verbal working memory were relevant variables for reading comprehension in this population

Global surgery, obstetric, and anaesthesia indicator definitions and reporting: An Utstein consensus report

BACKGROUND: Indicators to evaluate progress towards timely access to safe surgical, anaesthesia, and obstetric (SAO) care were proposed in 2015 by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery. These aimed to capture access to surgery, surgical workforce, surgical volume, perioperative mortality rate, and catastrophic and impoverishing financial consequences of surgery. Despite being rapidly taken up by practitioners, data points from which to derive the indicators were not defined, limiting comparability across time or settings. We convened global experts to evaluate and explicitly define-for the first time-the indicators to improve comparability and support achievement of 2030 goals to improve access to safe affordable surgical and anaesthesia care globally. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The Utstein process for developing and reporting guidelines through a consensus building process was followed. In-person discussions at a 2-day meeting were followed by an iterative process conducted by email and virtual group meetings until consensus was reached. The meeting was held between June 16 to 18, 2019; discussions continued until August 2020. Participants consisted of experts in surgery, anaesthesia, and obstetric care, data science, and health indicators from high-, middle-, and low-income countries. Considering each of the 6 indicators in turn, we refined overarching descriptions and agreed upon data points needed for construction of each indicator at current time (basic data points), and as each evolves over 2 to 5 (intermediate) and >5 year (full) time frames. We removed one of the original 6 indicators (one of 2 financial risk protection indicators was eliminated) and refined descriptions and defined data points required to construct the 5 remaining indicators: geospatial access, workforce, surgical volume, perioperative mortality, and catastrophic expenditure. A strength of the process was the number of people from global institutes and multilateral agencies involved in the collection and reporting of global health metrics; a limitation was the limited number of participants from low- or middle-income countries-who only made up 21% of the total attendees. CONCLUSIONS: To track global progress towards timely access to quality SAO care, these indicators-at the basic level-should be implemented universally as soon as possible. Intermediate and full indicator sets should be achieved by all countries over time. Meanwhile, these evolutions can assist in the short term in developing national surgical plans and collecting more detailed data for research studies