Transnasal Humidified Rapid Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange in children requiring emergent intubation (Kids THRIVE): a statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial

The placement of an endotracheal tube for children with acute or critical illness is a low-frequency and high-risk procedure, associated with high rates of first-attempt failure and adverse events, including hypoxaemia. To reduce the frequency of these adverse events, the provision of oxygen to the patient during the apnoeic phase of intubation has been proposed as a method to prolong the time available for the operator to insert the endotracheal tube, prior to the onset of hypoxaemia. However, there are limited data from randomised controlled trials to validate the efficacy of this technique in children. The technique known as transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) uses high oxygen flow rates (approximately 2 L/kg/min) delivered through nasal cannulae during apnoea. It has been shown to at least double the amount of time available for safe intubation in healthy children undergoing elective surgery. The technique and its application in real time have not previously been studied in acutely ill or injured children presenting to the emergency department or admitted to an intensive care unit. The Kids THRIVE trial is a multicentre, international, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in children less than 16 years old undergoing emergent intubation in either the intensive care unit or emergency department of participating hospitals. Participants will be randomised to receive either the THRIVE intervention or standard care (no apnoeic oxygenation) during their intubation. The primary objective of the trial is to determine if the use of THRIVE reduces the frequency of oxygen desaturation and increases the frequency of first-attempt success without hypoxaemia in emergent intubation of children compared with standard practice. The secondary objectives of the study are to assess the impact of the use of THRIVE on the rate of adverse events, length of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in intensive care. In this paper, we describe the detailed statistical analysis plan as an update of the previously published protocol

0.9% Sodium chloride solution versus Plasma-Lyte 148 versus compound sodium lacTate solution in children admitted to PICU-a randomized controlled trial (SPLYT-P): study protocol for an intravenous fluid therapy trial

BACKGROUND Intravenous fluid therapy represents the most common intervention critically ill patients are exposed to. Hyperchloremia and metabolic acidosis associated with 0.9% sodium chloride have been observed to lead to worse outcomes, including mortality. Balanced solutions, such as Plasma-Lyte 148 and Compound Sodium Lactate, represent potential alternatives but the evidence on optimal fluid choices in critically ill children remains scarce. This study aims to demonstrate whether balanced solutions, when used as intravenous fluid therapy, are able to reduce the incidence of a rise in serum chloride level compared to 0.9% sodium chloride in critically ill children. METHODS This is a single-centre, open-label randomized controlled trial with parallel 1:1:1 assignment into three groups: 0.9% sodium chloride, Plasma-Lyte 148, and Compound Sodium Lactate solutions for intravenous fluid therapy. The intervention includes both maintenance and bolus fluid therapy. Children aged < 16 years admitted to intensive care and receiving intravenous fluid therapy during the first 4 h of admission are eligible. The primary outcome measure is a ≥ 5mmol/L increase in serum chloride level within 48 h post-randomization. The enrolment target is 480 patients. The main analyses will be intention-to-treat. DISCUSSION This study tests three types of intravenous fluid therapy in order to compare the risk of hyperchloremia associated with normal saline versus balanced solutions. This pragmatic study is thereby assessing the most common intervention in paediatric critical care. This is a single-centre open-label study with no blinding at the level of delivery of the intervention. Certain paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patient groups such as those admitted with a cardiac condition or following a traumatic brain injury are excluded from this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study has received ethical approval (HREC/19/QCHQ/53177: 06/06/2019). It is registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12619001244190 ) from 9th September 2019. Recruitment commenced on 12th November 2019. The primary results manuscript will be published in a peer-reviewed journal

Prediction of acute kidney injury on admission to pediatric intensive care

OBJECTIVES: Up to 37% of children admitted to the PICU develop acute kidney injury as defined by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. We describe the prevalence of acute kidney injury in a mixed pediatric intensive care cohort using this criteria. As tools to stratify patients at risk of acute kidney injury on PICU admission are lacking, we explored the variables at admission and day 1 that might predict the development of acute kidney injury. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective observational study. SETTING: Thirty-six-bed surgical/medical tertiary PICU. PATIENTS: Children from birth to less than or equal to 16 years old admitted between 2015 and 2018. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical data were extracted from the PICU clinical information system. Patients with baseline creatinine at admission greater than 20 micromol/L above the calculated normal creatinine level were classified as "high risk of acute kidney injury." Models were created to predict acute kidney injury at admission and on day 1. Out of the 7,505 children admitted during the study period, 738 patients (9.8%) were classified as high risk of acute kidney injury at admission and 690 (9.2%) developed acute kidney injury during PICU admission. Compared to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria as the reference standard, high risk of acute kidney injury had a lower sensitivity and higher specificity compared with renal angina index greater than or equal to 8 on day 1. For the admission model, the adjusted odds ratio of developing acute kidney injury for high risk of acute kidney injury was 4.2 (95% CI, 3.3-5.2). The adjusted odds ratio in the noncardiac cohort for high risk of acute kidney injury was 7.3 (95% CI, 5.5-9.7). For the day 1 model, odds ratios for high risk of acute kidney injury and renal angina index greater than or equal to 8 were 3.3 (95% CI, 2.6-4.2) and 3.1 (95% CI, 2.4-3.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between high risk of acute kidney injury and acute kidney injury needs further evaluation. High risk of acute kidney injury performed better in the noncardiac cohort

Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury on Admission to Pediatric Intensive Care

Up to 37% of children admitted to the PICU develop acute kidney injury as defined by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. We describe the prevalence of acute kidney injury in a mixed pediatric intensive care cohort using this criteria. As tools to stratify patients at risk of acute kidney injury on PICU admission are lacking, we explored the variables at admission and day 1 that might predict the development of acute kidney injury.Single-center retrospective observational study.Thirty-six-bed surgical/medical tertiary PICU.Children from birth to less than or equal to 16 years old admitted between 2015 and 2018.None.Clinical data were extracted from the PICU clinical information system. Patients with baseline creatinine at admission greater than 20 micromol/L above the calculated normal creatinine level were classified as "high risk of acute kidney injury." Models were created to predict acute kidney injury at admission and on day 1. Out of the 7,505 children admitted during the study period, 738 patients (9.8%) were classified as high risk of acute kidney injury at admission and 690 (9.2%) developed acute kidney injury during PICU admission. Compared to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria as the reference standard, high risk of acute kidney injury had a lower sensitivity and higher specificity compared with renal angina index greater than or equal to 8 on day 1. For the admission model, the adjusted odds ratio of developing acute kidney injury for high risk of acute kidney injury was 4.2 (95% CI, 3.3-5.2). The adjusted odds ratio in the noncardiac cohort for high risk of acute kidney injury was 7.3 (95% CI, 5.5-9.7). For the day 1 model, odds ratios for high risk of acute kidney injury and renal angina index greater than or equal to 8 were 3.3 (95% CI, 2.6-4.2) and 3.1 (95% CI, 2.4-3.8), respectively.The relationship between high risk of acute kidney injury and acute kidney injury needs further evaluation. High risk of acute kidney injury performed better in the noncardiac cohort

Effect of Saline vs Gluconate/Acetate-Buffered Solution vs Lactate-Buffered Solution on Serum Chloride Among Children in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: The SPLYT-P Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE Most children admitted to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) receive intravenous fluids. A recent systematic review suggested mortality benefit in critically ill adults treated with balanced solutions compared with sodium chloride, 0.9% (saline). There is a lack of clinically directive data on optimal fluid choice in critically ill children. OBJECTIVE To determine if balanced solutions decrease the rise of plasma chloride compared with saline, 0.9%, in critically ill children. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-center, 3-arm, open-label randomized clinical trial took place in a 36-bed PICU. Children younger than 16 years admitted to the PICU and considered to require intravenous fluid therapy by the treating clinician were eligible. Children were screened from November 2019 to April 2021. INTERVENTIONS Enrolled children were 1:1:1 allocated to gluconate/acetate-buffered solution, lactate-buffered solution, or saline as intravenous fluids. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was an increase in serum chloride of 5 mEq/L or more within 48 hours from randomization. New-onset acute kidney injury, length of hospital and intensive care stay, and intensive care-free survival were secondary outcomes. RESULTS A total of 516 patients with a median (IQR) age of 3.8 (1.0-10.4) years were randomized with 178, 171, and 167 allocated to gluconate/acetate-buffered solution, lactate-buffered solution, and saline, respectively. The serum chloride level increased 5 mEq/L or more in 37 patients (25.2%), 34 patients (23.9%), and 58 patients (40.0%) in the gluconate/acetate-buffered solution, lactate-buffered solution, and saline groups. The odds of a rise in plasma chloride 5 mEq/L or more was halved with the use of gluconate/acetate-buffered solution compared with saline (odds ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.31-0.83]; P = .007) and with the use of lactate-buffered solution compared with saline (odds ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.28-0.79]; P = .004). New-onset acute kidney injury was observed in 10 patients (6.1%), 6 patients (3.7%), and 5 patients (3.2%) in the gluconate/acetate-buffered solution, lactate-buffered solution, and saline groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Balanced solutions (gluconate/acetate-buffered solution and lactate-buffered solution) administered as intravenous fluid therapy reduced the incidence of rise in plasma chloride compared with saline in children in PICU. TRIAL REGISTRATION anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12619001244190

Perioperative dexmedetomidine compared to midazolam in children undergoing open-heart surgery: A pilot randomised controlled trial

Objective: There is a need for evidence on the best sedative agents in children undergoing open heart surgery for congenital heart disease. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of dexmedetomidine in this group compared with midazolam. Design: Double blinded, pilot randomized controlled trial. Setting: Cardiac operating theatre and paediatric intensive care unit in Brisbane, Australia. Participants: Infants (≤12 months of age) undergoing their first surgical repair of a congenital heart defect. Interventions: Dexmedetomidine (up to 1.0mcg/kg/hr) versus midazolam (up to 80mcg/kg/hr), commenced in the cardiac operating theatre prior to surgery. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the time spent in light sedation (Sedation Behavior Scale [SBS] -1 to +1); Co-primary feasibility outcome was recruitment, retention and protocol adherence. Secondary outcomes were use of supplemental sedatives, ventilator free days, delirium, vasoactive drug support, and adverse events. Neurodevelopment and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed at 12 months post-surgery. Results: Sixty-six participants were recruited. The number of SBS scores in the light sedation range were greater in the dexmedetomidine group at 24 hours, 48 hours, and overall study duration (0-14 days) versus the midazolam group (24hr: 76/170 [45%] vs 60/178 [34%], aOR 4.14 [95% CI 0.48, 35.92]; 48hr: 154/298 [52%] vs 122/314 [39%], aOR 6.95 [95% CI 0.77, 63.13]; 0-14 days: 597/831 [72%] vs 527/939 [56%], aOR 3.93 [95% CI 0.62, 25.03]). Feasibility was established with no withdrawals or loss to follow-up at 14 days and minimal protocol deviations. There were no differences between the groups relating to clinical, safety, neurodevelopment or HRQoL outcomes. Conclusions: The use of dexmedetomidine was associated with more time spent in light sedation when compared with midazolam. The feasibility of conducting a blinded RCT of midazolam and dexmedetomidine in children undergoing open heart surgery was also established. The findings justify further investigation in a larger trial. Clinical trial registration: ACTRN12615001304527.</p

sj-docx-1-ctj-10.1177_17407745231222019 – Supplemental material for Assessing the impact of risk-based data monitoring on outcomes for a paediatric multicentre randomised controlled trial

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-ctj-10.1177_17407745231222019 for Assessing the impact of risk-based data monitoring on outcomes for a paediatric multicentre randomised controlled trial by Renate Le Marsney, Kerry Johnson, Jenipher Chumbes Flores, Shelley Coetzer, Jennifer Darvas, Carmel Delzoppo, Arielle Jolly, Kate Masterson, Claire Sherring, Hannah Thomson, Endrias Ergetu, Patricia Gilholm and Kristen S Gibbons in Clinical Trials</p

Transnasal Humidified Rapid Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange in children requiring emergent intubation (Kids THRIVE): a statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial

Abstract The placement of an endotracheal tube for children with acute or critical illness is a low-frequency and high-risk procedure, associated with high rates of first-attempt failure and adverse events, including hypoxaemia. To reduce the frequency of these adverse events, the provision of oxygen to the patient during the apnoeic phase of intubation has been proposed as a method to prolong the time available for the operator to insert the endotracheal tube, prior to the onset of hypoxaemia. However, there are limited data from randomised controlled trials to validate the efficacy of this technique in children. The technique known as transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) uses high oxygen flow rates (approximately 2 L/kg/min) delivered through nasal cannulae during apnoea. It has been shown to at least double the amount of time available for safe intubation in healthy children undergoing elective surgery. The technique and its application in real time have not previously been studied in acutely ill or injured children presenting to the emergency department or admitted to an intensive care unit. The Kids THRIVE trial is a multicentre, international, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in children less than 16 years old undergoing emergent intubation in either the intensive care unit or emergency department of participating hospitals. Participants will be randomised to receive either the THRIVE intervention or standard care (no apnoeic oxygenation) during their intubation. The primary objective of the trial is to determine if the use of THRIVE reduces the frequency of oxygen desaturation and increases the frequency of first-attempt success without hypoxaemia in emergent intubation of children compared with standard practice. The secondary objectives of the study are to assess the impact of the use of THRIVE on the rate of adverse events, length of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in intensive care. In this paper, we describe the detailed statistical analysis plan as an update of the previously published protocol

Inhibiting Eph/ephrin signaling reduces vascular leak and endothelial cell dysfunction in mice with sepsis

Sepsis is a life-threatening disease caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, resulting in 11 million deaths globally each year. Vascular endothelial cell dysfunction results in the loss of endothelial barrier integrity, which contributes to sepsis-induced multiple organ failure and mortality. Erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular carcinoma (Eph) receptors and their ephrin ligands play a key role in vascular endothelial barrier disruption but are currently not a therapeutic target in sepsis. Using a cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) mouse model of sepsis, we showed that prophylactic or therapeutic treatment of mice with EphA4-Fc, a decoy receptor and pan-ephrin inhibitor, resulted in improved survival and a reduction in vascular leak, lung injury, and endothelial cell dysfunction. EphA2$^{−/−}$ mice also exhibited reduced mortality and pathology after CLP compared with wild-type mice. Proteomics of plasma samples from mice with sepsis after CLP revealed dysregulation of a number of Eph/ephrins, including EphA2/ephrin A1. Administration of EphA4-Fc to cultured human endothelial cells pretreated with TNF-α or ephrin-A1 prevented loss of endothelial junction proteins, specifically VE-cadherin, with maintenance of endothelial barrier integrity. In children admitted to hospital with fever and suspected infection, we observed that changes in EphA2/ephrin A1 in serum samples correlated with endothelial and organ dysfunction. Targeting Eph/ephrin signaling may be a potential therapeutic strategy to reduce sepsis-induced endothelial dysfunction and mortality