O enamoramento e o amor de transferência

Freud describes love as comtnua with many-situations such as being m love with someone and love transferance. The author explores the differents forms of the love affairs wich he calls "enamoraLion" lor precises clinical reasons, particularely in relation with the reversal of love into hate, wich in trench only can be heard in the significier "én a m ora tion ". Th e correspondances and the differences with love transfera nee are precised, both in analysis of adolescents and adults.O amor é definido por Freud como uma moção comum a muitas situações dentre as quais a relação amorosa e o amor de transferência. O autor explora as diferentes facetas da relação amorosa, chamada enamoramento, por motivos clínicos precisos, e particularmente em função da transformação do amor em ódio, que em francês se entende no significante enamoração. As correspondências e também as distinções com o amor de transferência são precisas, tanto nos tratamentos de adolescentes quanto nos de adultos

Le sujet enamouré

PARIS7-Bibliothèque centrale (751132105) / SudocSudocFranceF

Interview with Jean Laplanche

The starting point for this interview with Jean Laplanche is a question regarding the place of infantile sexuality within psychoanalysis today. Laplanche begins by underscoring the audaciousness of Freud's characterization of infantile sexuality and the significance of the expansion of the field of “the sexual” that this characterization entails. He goes on to outline his celebrated “general theory of seduction.” In doing so he explains key terms associated with it, such as the “enigmatic message” and the “fundamental anthropological situation,” and clarifies how the theory seeks to account for sexuality in the expanded sense. In particular, Laplanche stresses the intersubjective origins of “drive” sexuality in infancy, its chaotic evolution, its unique economic mode of functioning, and its subsequent conflict with innate “instinctual” sexual impulses that surge forth at puberty. He also positions the general theory of seduction in relation to the important advances made by attachment theory in the field of the adult–child relationship. Throughout the interview, the discussion touches on social contexts, and at points Laplanche outlines positions on topical concerns connected to education, media, and the law, and the importance of rethinking certain psychoanalytic paradigms in an age of new family structures that do not correspond to the nuclear unit