Endoscopic screening of the upper gastrointestinal tract for second primary tumors in patients with head and neck cancer in a Western country

Background: Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) relatively frequent develop second primary tumors (SPTs) in the esophagus. Endoscopic screening could lead to timely detection of SPTs in early stages and therefore improves the survival. Methods: We performed a prospective endoscopic screening study in patients with HNSCC in a Western country. Patients with curably treated HNSCC diagnosed January 2017 to July 2021 were included. Routine imaging for HNSCC consisted of flexible transnasal endoscopy with PET/CT or MRI-scan, depending on primary HNSCC location. Screening was performed synchronously(&lt;6 months) or metachronously (≥6 months) after HNSCC diagnosis. The primary outcome was prevalence of SPTs, defined as presence of esophageal high-grade dysplasia or squamous cell carcinoma. Results: We included 202 patients (81% male, mean age 65 years) and performed 250 screening endoscopies. HNSCC was located in the oropharynx(32%), hypopharynx(26%), larynx(22%), and oral cavity(19%). Endoscopic screening was performed within 6 months(34%), 6 months to 1 year(8%), 1 to 2 years(34%), and 2 to 5 years(24%) after HNSCC diagnosis. We detected 11 SPTs in 10 patients(5.0%, 95%CI: 2.4-8.9%) during synchronous(6/85) and metachronous screening(5/165). Most SPTs were detected in early stages(91%) and treated with curative intent with endoscopic resection(80%). No SPTs in screened patients were detected with routine imaging for HNSCC before endoscopic screening. Conclusion: In 5% of patients with HNSCC, an SPT was detected with endoscopic screening. Endoscopic screening should be considered in a selection of HNSCC patients to detect early-stage SPTs, based on highest SPT-risk and life expectancy depending on HNSCC and comorbidities.</p

Extending treatment criteria for Barrett's neoplasia:results of a nationwide cohort of 138 ESDs

BACKGROUND:  The use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is gradually expanding for treatment of neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE). We aimed to report outcomes of all ESDs for BE neoplasia performed in the Netherlands. METHODS:  Retrospective assessment of outcomes, using treatment and follow-up data from a joint database. RESULTS:  130/138 patients had complete ESDs, with 126/130 (97 %) en bloc resections. Median (interquartile range (IQR)) procedure time was 121 minutes (90-180). Pathology findings were high grade dysplasia (HGD) (5 %) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) T1a (43 %) or T1b (52 %; 19 % sm1, 33 % ≥ sm2). Among resections of HGD or T1a EAC lesions, 87 % (95 %CI 75 %-92 %) were both en bloc and R0; the corresponding value for T1b EAC lesions was 49 % (36 %-60 %). Among R1 resections, 10/34 (29 %) showed residual cancer, all detected at first endoscopic follow-up. The remaining 24 patients (71 %) showed no residual neoplasia. Six of these patients underwent surgery with no residual tumor; the remaining 18 underwent endoscopic follow-up during median 31 months with 1 local recurrence (annual recurrence rate 2 %). Among R0 resections, annual local recurrence rate during median 27 months was 0.5 %. CONCLUSION:  In expert hands, ESD allows safe removal of bulky intraluminal neoplasia and submucosal cancer. ESD of the latter showed R1 resection margins in 50 %, yet only one third had persisting neoplasia at follow-up. To better stratify R1 patients with an indication for additional surgery, repeat endoscopy after healing of the ESD might be a helpful possible prognostic factor for residual cancer

Detection and endoscopic treatment of esophageal neoplasia

Part I contains the general introduction and outline of this thesis. In Part II, endoscopic detection of abnormalities during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and patients at increased risk of esophageal cancer are assessed. Chapter 2 provides an overview of the current state of artificial intelligence for the detection, characterization, and delineation of cancers in the upper gastrointestinal tract and their premalignant stages. Chapter 3 reports on the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with distinct grades of squamous dysplasia in a Western country. Part III focuses on second primary tumors (SPTs) in the upper aerodigestive tract. In Chapter 4, the prevalence of lung SPTs in patients with esophageal cancer and vice versa is discussed. Chapter 5 reports on the knowledge and awareness of SPTs among gastroenterologists and head and neck surgeons in the Netherlands. In Chapter 6, endoscopic screening for SPTs in the upper gastrointestinal tract patients with current or previous HNSCC is investigated. This chapter also contains a response letter, discussing the yield of endoscopic screening for esophageal SPTs. Part IV describes endoscopic treatment of early esophageal cancers. Chapter 7 reports on the yield and safety of circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection (cESD) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Western countries. In this study, curative resection rates in terms of en bloc and radical resections and the risk of esophageal strictures and adverse events related to the cESD are described. In Chapter 8, the risk of local residual cancer after endoscopic resection of Barrett’s neoplasia with confirmed tumor-positive vertical resection margin is explored. A summary and general discussion of this thesis is presented in Chapter 9. The conclusions are presented in Chapter 10

Artificial Intelligence in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Background: Over the past decade, several artificial intelligence (AI) systems are developed to assist in endoscopic assessment of (pre-)cancerous lesions of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. In this review, we aimed to provide an overview of the possible indications of AI technology in upper GI endoscopy and hypothesize about potential challenges for its use in clinical practice. Summary: Application of AI in upper GI endoscopy has been investigated for several indications: (1) detection, characterization, and delineation of esophageal and gastric cancer (GC) and their premalignant conditions; (2) prediction of tumor invasion; and (3) detection of Helicobacter pylori. AI systems show promising results with an accuracy of up to 99% for the detection of superficial and advanced upper GI cancers. AI outperformed trainee and experienced endoscopists for the detection of esophageal lesions and atrophic gastritis. For GC, AI outperformed mid-level and trainee endoscopists but not expert endoscopists. Key Messages: Application of artificial intelligence (AI) in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy may improve early diagnosis of esophageal and gastric cancer and may enable endoscopists to better identify patients eligible for endoscopic resection. The benefit of AI on the quality of upper endoscopy still needs to be demonstrated, while prospective trials are needed to confirm accuracy and feasibility during real-time daily endoscopy

Prevalence of lung tumors in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and vice versa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose : Recent reports suggest an increased prevalence of lung second primary tumors (LSPTs) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients and vice versa. However, the exact prevalence of SPTs remains unclear and screening for these SPTs is currently not routinely performed in western countries. We aimed to report on the prevalence of LSPTs in patients with ESCC and esophageal second primary tumors (ESPTs) in patients with lung cancer (LC). Methods : Databases were searched until 25 March 2021 for studies reporting the prevalence of LSPTs in ESCC or vice versa. Pooled prevalences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of SPTs were calculated with inverse variance, random-effects models and Clopper–Pearson. Results : Nineteen studies in ESCC patients and 20 studies in LC patients were included. The pooled prevalence of LSPTs in patients with ESCC was 1.8% (95% CI 1.4–2.3%). For ESPTs in LC patients, the pooled prevalence was 0.2% (95% CI 0.1–0.4%). The prevalence of LSPTs in ESCC patients was significantly higher in patients treated curatively compared to studies also including palliative patients (median 2.5% versus 1.3%). This difference was consistent for the ESPT prevalence in LC patients (treated curatively median 1.3% versus 0.1% for all treatments). Over 50% of the detected SPTs were squamous cell carcinomas and were diagnosed metachronously. Conclusion : Patients with ESCC and LC have an increased risk of developing SPTs in the lungs and esophagus. However, the relatively low SPT prevalence rates do not justify screening in these patients. Further research should focus on risk stratification to identify subgroups of patients at highest risk of SPT development

Screening for head and neck tumors in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and vice versa: a nationwide survey among medical specialists

Background and study aims Retrospectively, minimally 5% of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and 11 % with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in Western countries developed a second primary tumor (SPT). SPT screening in ESCC and HNSCC patients is not implemented routinely in daily practice in many Western countries. This study aimed to assess medical specialist knowledge and opinions regarding screening for head and neck SPTs (HNSPTs) in ESCC patients and vice versa in the Netherlands. Methods A nationwide survey among gastroenterologists and head and neck (HN) surgeons was conducted between December 2020 and March 2021. The survey consisted of 27 questions and focused on knowledge of medical specialists of the prevalence and opinions toward implementing screening for HNSPTs in ESCC patients and vice versa. Results One hundred twenty-eight gastroenterologists (20.5%) and 31 HN surgeons (50.0%) completed the survey. The expected median prevalence of HNSPTs in ESCC was 7.0% (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.0-15.0) among gastroenterologists and 5.0% (IQR:3.0-8.0) among HN surgeons. For ESPTs in HNSCC, the expected median prevalence was 9.5% (IQR: 5.0-12.0) among gastroenterologists and 4.0% (IQR: 2.0-5.0) among HN surgeons. Screening for HNSPTs and ESPTs was considered promising by 35.2% and 39.6%, respectively, which increased to 54.7% of the specialists after providing incidence data on SPTs. Of the HN surgeons, 41.3% felt they were as capable as gastroenterologists of performing esophageal screening. Conclusions This Dutch nationwide survey revealed a lack of knowledge and different perspectives among specialists about screening to detect SPTs in ESCC and HNSCC patients. Adequate education seems essential to increase awareness among specialists and improve SPT detection, independent of the need for implementation of screening for SPTs in ESCC and HNSCC patients

Low risk of local recurrence after a successful en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection for noninvasive colorectal lesions with positive horizontal resection margins (R-ESD study)

Background During endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the normal mucosa is cut under constant optical control. We studied whether a positive horizontal resection margin after a complete en bloc ESD predicts local recurrence. Methods In this European multicenter cohort study, patients with a complete en bloc colorectal ESD were selected from prospective registries. Cases were defined by a horizontal resection margin that was positive or indeterminate for dysplasia (HM1), whereas controls had a free resection margin (HM0). Low risk lesions with submucosal invasion (T1) and margins free of carcinoma were analyzed separately. The main outcome was local recurrence. Results From 928 consecutive ESDs (2011–2020), 354 patients (40% female; mean age 67 years, median follow-up 23.6 months), with 308 noninvasive lesions and 46 T1 lesions, were included. The recurrence rate for noninvasive lesions was 1/212 (0.5 %; 95 %CI 0.02%–2.6%) for HM0 vs. 2/96 (2.1 %; 95 %CI 0.57%–7.3%) for HM1.The recurrence rate for T1 lesions was 1/38 (2.6%; 95%CI 0.14%–13.5%) for HM0 vs. 2/8 (25%; 95%CI 7.2%–59.1 %) for HM1. Conclusion A positive horizontal resection margin after an en bloc ESD for noninvasive lesions is associated with a marginal nonsignificant increase in the local recurrence rate, equal to an ESD with clear horizontal margins. This could not be confirmed for T1 lesions

Correction: Predicting procedure duration of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection at Western endoscopy centers

Cellular mechanisms in basic and clinical gastroenterology and hepatolog