Gene-based microsatellite development for mapping and phylogeny studies in eggplant

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Eggplant (<it>Solanum melongena </it>L.) is a member of the <it>Solanaceae </it>family. In spite of its widespread cultivation and nutritional and economic importance, its genome has not as yet been extensively investigated. Few analyses have been carried out to determine the genetic diversity of eggplant at the DNA level, and linkage relationships have not been well characterised. As for the other <it>Solanaceae </it>crop species (potato, tomato and pepper), the level of intra-specific polymorphism appears to be rather limited, and so it is important that an effort is made to develop more informative DNA markers to make progress in understanding the genetics of eggplant and to advance its breeding. The aim of the present work was to develop a set of functional microsatellite (SSR) markers, via an <it>in silico </it>analysis of publicly available DNA sequence.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>From >3,300 genic DNA sequences, 50 SSR-containing candidates suitable for primer design were recovered. Of these, 39 were functional, and were then applied to a panel of 44 accessions, of which 38 were cultivated eggplant varieties, and six were from related <it>Solanum </it>species. The usefulness of the SSR assays for diversity analysis and taxonomic discrimination was demonstrated by constructing a phylogeny based on SSR polymorphisms, and by the demonstration that most were also functional when tested with template from tomato, pepper and potato. As a results of BLASTN analyses, several eggplant SSRs were found to have homologous counterparts in the phylogenetically related species, which carry microsatellite motifs in the same position.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The set of eggplant EST-SSR markers was informative for phylogenetic analysis and genetic mapping. Since EST-SSRs lie within expressed sequence, they have the potential to serve as perfect markers for genes determining variation in phenotype. Their high level of transferability to other <it>Solanaceae </it>species can be used to provide anchoring points for the integration of genetic maps across species.</p

Reversible male sterility in eggplant

SummarySince decades, plant male sterility is considered a powerful tool for biological containment to minimize unwanted self‐pollination for hybrid seed production. Furthermore, prevention of pollen dispersal also answers to concerns regarding transgene flow via pollen from Genetically Modified (GM) crops to traditional crop fields or wild relatives. We induced male sterility by suppressing endogenous general transcription factor genes, TAFs, using anther‐specific promoters combined with artificial microRNA (amiRNA) technology (Schwab et al., 2006). The system was made reversible by the ethanol inducible expression of an amiRNA‐insensitive form of the target gene. We provide proof of concept in eggplant, a cultivated crop belonging to the Solanaceae family that includes many important food crops. The transgenic eggplants that we generated are completely male sterile and fertility can be fully restored by short treatments with ethanol, confirming the efficiency but also the reliability of the system in view of open field cultivation. By combining this system with induced parthenocarpy (Rotino et al., 1997), we provide a novel example of complete transgene containment in eggplant, which enables biological mitigation measures for the benefit of coexistence or biosafety purposes for GM crop cultivation

New Insights on Eggplant/Tomato/Pepper Synteny and Identification of Eggplant and Pepper Orthologous QTL

Eggplant, pepper and tomato are the most exploited berry-producing vegetables within the Solanaceae family. Their genomes differ in size, but each has 12 chromosomes which have undergone rearrangements causing a redistribution of loci. The genome sequences of all three species are available but differ in coverage, assembly quality and percentage of anchorage.Determining their syntenic relationship and QTL orthology will contribute to exploit genomic resources and genetic data for key agronomic traits.The syntenic analysis between tomato and pepper based on the alignment of 34,727 tomato CDS to the pepper genome sequence, identified 19,734 unique hits. The resulting synteny map confirmed the 14 inversions and 10 translocations previously documented, but also highlighted 3 new translocations and 4 major new inversions. Furthermore, each of the 12 chromosomes exhibited a number of rearrangements involving small regions of 0.5-0.7 Mbp.Due to high fragmentation of the publicly available eggplant genome sequence, physical localization of most eggplant QTL was not possible, thus, we compared the organization of the eggplant genetic map with the genome sequence of both tomato and pepper. The eggplant/tomato syntenic map confirmed all the 10 translocations but only 9 of the 14 known inversions; on the other hand, a newly detected inversion was recognized while another one was not confirmed. The eggplant/pepper syntenic map confirmed 10 translocations and 8 inversions already detected and suggested a putative new translocation.In order to perform the assessment of eggplant and pepper QTL orthology, the eggplant and pepper sequence-based markers located in their respective genetic map were aligned onto the pepper genome. GBrowse in pepper was used as reference platform for QTL positioning. A set of 151 pepper QTL were located as well as 212 eggplant QTL, including 76 major QTL (PVE ≥ 10%) affecting key agronomic traits. Most were confirmed to cluster in orthologous chromosomal regions.Our results highlight that the availability of genome sequences for an increasing number of crop species and the development of ultra-dense physical maps provide new and key tools for detailed syntenic and orthology studies between related plant species

Mapping quantitative trait loci affecting biochemical and morphological fruit properties in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.)

Eggplant berries are a source of health-promoting metabolites including antioxidant and nutraceutical compounds, mainly anthocyanins and chlorogenic acid; however, they also contain some anti-nutritional compounds such as steroidal glycoalkaloids (SGA) and saponins, which are responsible for the bitter taste of the flesh and with potential toxic effects on humans. Up to now, Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) for the metabolic content are far from being characterized in eggplant, thus hampering the application of breeding programs aimed at improving its fruit quality. Here we report on the identification of some QTL for the fruit metabolic content in an F2 intraspecific mapping population of 156 individuals, obtained by crossing the eggplant breeding lines ‘305E40’ x ‘67/3’. The same population was previously employed for the development of a RAD-tag based linkage map and the identification of QTL associated to morphological and physiological traits. The mapping population was biochemically characterized for both fruit basic qualitative data, like dry matter, °Brix, sugars and organic acids, as well as for health-related compounds such chlorogenic acid, (the main flesh monomeric phenol), the two peel anthocyanins (i.e. delphinidin-3-rutinoside (D3R) and delphinidin-3-(p-coumaroylrutinoside)-5-glucoside (nasunin)) and the two main steroidal glycoalkaloids, solasonine and solamargine. For most of the traits, one major QTL (PVE ≥ 10%) was spotted and putative orthologies with other Solanaceae crops are discussed. The present results supply valuable information to eggplant breeders on the inheritance of key fruit quality traits, thus providing potential tools to assist future breeding programs

Single Primer Enrichment Technology (SPET) for High-Throughput Genotyping in Tomato and Eggplant Germplasm

[EN] Single primer enrichment technology (SPET) is a new, robust, and customizable solution for targeted genotyping. Unlike genotyping by sequencing (GBS), and like DNA chips, SPET is a targeted genotyping technology, relying on the sequencing of a region flanking a primer. Its reliance on single primers, rather than on primer pairs, greatly simplifies panel design, and allows higher levels of multiplexing than PCR-based genotyping. Thanks to the sequencing of the regions surrounding the target SNP, SPET allows the discovery of thousands of closely linked, novel SNPs. In order to assess the potential of SPET for high-throughput genotyping in plants, a panel comprising 5k target SNPs, designed both on coding regions and introns/UTRs, was developed for tomato and eggplant. Genotyping of two panels composed of 400 tomato and 422 eggplant accessions, comprising both domesticated material and wild relatives, generated a total of 12,002 and 30,731 high confidence SNPs, respectively, which comprised both target and novel SNPs in an approximate ratio of 1:1.6, and 1:5.5 in tomato and eggplant, respectively. The vast majority of the markers was transferrable to related species that diverged up to 3.4 million years ago (Solanum pennellii for tomato and S. macrocarpon for eggplant). Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic trees and PCA outputs obtained from the whole dataset highlighted genetic relationships among accessions and species which were congruent with what was previously reported in literature. Better discrimination among domesticated accessions was achieved by using the target SNPs, while better discrimination among wild species was achieved using the whole SNP dataset. Our results reveal that SPET genotyping is a robust, high-throughput technology for genetic fingerprinting, with a high degree of cross-transferability between crops and their cultivated and wild relatives, and allows identification of duplicates and mislabeled accessions in genebanks.This work has been funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the grant agreement number 677379 (G2P-SOL project: Linking genetic resources, genomes, and phenotypes of solanaceous crops).Barchi, L.; Acquadro, A.; Alonso-Martín, D.; Aprea, G.; Bassolino, L.; Demurtas, O.; Ferrante, P.... (2019). Single Primer Enrichment Technology (SPET) for High-Throughput Genotyping in Tomato and Eggplant Germplasm. Frontiers in Plant Science. 10:1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01005S11710Acquadro, A., Barchi, L., Gramazio, P., Portis, E., Vilanova, S., Comino, C., … Lanteri, S. (2017). Coding SNPs analysis highlights genetic relationships and evolution pattern in eggplant complexes. PLOS ONE, 12(7), e0180774. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180774Anderson, J. A., Churchill, G. A., Autrique, J. E., Tanksley, S. D., & Sorrells, M. E. (1993). Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome, 36(1), 181-186. doi:10.1139/g93-024Barchi, L., Pietrella, M., Venturini, L., Minio, A., Toppino, L., Acquadro, A., … Rotino, G. L. (2019). A chromosome-anchored eggplant genome sequence reveals key events in Solanaceae evolution. Scientific Reports, 9(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47985-wBeddows, I., Reddy, A., Kloesges, T., & Rose, L. E. (2017). Population Genomics in Wild Tomatoes—The Interplay of Divergence and Admixture. Genome Biology and Evolution, 9(11), 3023-3038. doi:10.1093/gbe/evx224Blanca, J., Montero-Pau, J., Sauvage, C., Bauchet, G., Illa, E., Díez, M. J., … Cañizares, J. (2015). Genomic variation in tomato, from wild ancestors to contemporary breeding accessions. BMC Genomics, 16(1). doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1444-1Caicedo, A. L., & Schaal, B. A. (2004). Population structure and phylogeography of Solanum pimpinellifolium inferred from a nuclear gene. Molecular Ecology, 13(7), 1871-1882. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02191.xCastle, J. C. (2011). SNPs Occur in Regions with Less Genomic Sequence Conservation. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20660. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020660Cericola, F., Portis, E., Toppino, L., Barchi, L., Acciarri, N., Ciriaci, T., … Lanteri, S. (2013). The Population Structure and Diversity of Eggplant from Asia and the Mediterranean Basin. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e73702. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073702Chen, K.-Y., Cong, B., Wing, R., Vrebalov, J., & Tanksley, S. D. (2007). Changes in Regulation of a Transcription Factor Lead to Autogamy in Cultivated Tomatoes. Science, 318(5850), 643-645. doi:10.1126/science.1148428Chen, K.-Y., & Tanksley, S. D. (2004). High-Resolution Mapping and Functional Analysis ofse2.1. Genetics, 168(3), 1563-1573. doi:10.1534/genetics.103.022558Danecek, P., Auton, A., Abecasis, G., Albers, C. A., Banks, E., … DePristo, M. A. (2011). The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics, 27(15), 2156-2158. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330Davey, J. W., Hohenlohe, P. A., Etter, P. D., Boone, J. Q., Catchen, J. M., & Blaxter, M. L. (2011). Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12(7), 499-510. doi:10.1038/nrg3012Del Fabbro, C., Scalabrin, S., Morgante, M., & Giorgi, F. M. (2013). An Extensive Evaluation of Read Trimming Effects on Illumina NGS Data Analysis. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e85024. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085024DePristo, M. A., Banks, E., Poplin, R., Garimella, K. V., Maguire, J. R., Hartl, C., … Daly, M. J. (2011). A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nature Genetics, 43(5), 491-498. doi:10.1038/ng.806Dodsworth, S., Chase, M. W., Särkinen, T., Knapp, S., & Leitch, A. R. (2015). Using genomic repeats for phylogenomics: a case study in wild tomatoes (SolanumsectionLycopersicon: Solanaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 117(1), 96-105. doi:10.1111/bij.12612Elshire, R. J., Glaubitz, J. C., Sun, Q., Poland, J. A., Kawamoto, K., Buckler, E. S., & Mitchell, S. E. (2011). A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species. PLoS ONE, 6(5), e19379. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019379Flint-Garcia, S. A. (2013). Genetics and Consequences of Crop Domestication. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(35), 8267-8276. doi:10.1021/jf305511dGramazio, P., Prohens, J., Borràs, D., Plazas, M., Herraiz, F. J., & Vilanova, S. (2017). Comparison of transcriptome-derived simple sequence repeat (SSR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for genetic fingerprinting, diversity evaluation, and establishment of relationships in eggplants. Euphytica, 213(12). doi:10.1007/s10681-017-2057-3Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., von Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q., & Vinh, L. S. (2017). UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35(2), 518-522. doi:10.1093/molbev/msx281Hoheisel, J. D. (2006). Microarray technology: beyond transcript profiling and genotype analysis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7(3), 200-210. doi:10.1038/nrg1809Huerta-Cepas, J., Serra, F., & Bork, P. (2016). ETE 3: Reconstruction, Analysis, and Visualization of Phylogenomic Data. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33(6), 1635-1638. doi:10.1093/molbev/msw046Isshiki, S., Iwata, N., & Khan, M. M. R. (2008). ISSR variations in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) and related Solanum species. Scientia Horticulturae, 117(3), 186-190. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2008.04.003Kamenetzky, L., Asís, R., Bassi, S., de Godoy, F., Bermúdez, L., Fernie, A. R., … Carrari, F. (2010). Genomic Analysis of Wild Tomato Introgressions Determining Metabolism- and Yield-Associated Traits. Plant Physiology, 152(4), 1772-1786. doi:10.1104/pp.109.150532Kouassi, B., Prohens, J., Gramazio, P., Kouassi, A. B., Vilanova, S., Galán-Ávila, A., … Plazas, M. (2016). Development of backcross generations and new interspecific hybrid combinations for introgression breeding in eggplant ( Solanum melongena ). Scientia Horticulturae, 213, 199-207. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2016.10.039Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., … Homer, N. (2009). The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25(16), 2078-2079. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352Lin, T., Zhu, G., Zhang, J., Xu, X., Yu, Q., Zheng, Z., … Huang, S. (2014). Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nature Genetics, 46(11), 1220-1226. doi:10.1038/ng.3117Lynch, V. J., & Wagner, G. P. (2010). DID EGG-LAYING BOAS BREAK DOLLO’S LAW? PHYLOGENETIC EVIDENCE FOR REVERSAL TO OVIPARITY IN SAND BOAS (ERYX: BOIDAE). Evolution, 64(1), 207-216. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00790.xMammadov, J., Aggarwal, R., Buyyarapu, R., & Kumpatla, S. (2012). SNP Markers and Their Impact on Plant Breeding. International Journal of Plant Genomics, 2012, 1-11. doi:10.1155/2012/728398Martin, M. (2011). Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal, 17(1), 10. doi:10.14806/ej.17.1.200Mason, A. S., Zhang, J., Tollenaere, R., Vasquez Teuber, P., Dalton-Morgan, J., Hu, L., … Batley, J. (2015). High-throughput genotyping for species identification and diversity assessment in germplasm collections. Molecular Ecology Resources, 15(5), 1091-1101. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12379Meyer, R. S., Karol, K. G., Little, D. P., Nee, M. H., & Litt, A. (2012). Phylogeographic relationships among Asian eggplants and new perspectives on eggplant domestication. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 63(3), 685-701. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.02.006Miz, R. B., Mentz, L. A., & Souza-Chies, T. T. (2007). Overview of the phylogenetic relationships of some southern Brazilian species from section Torva and related sections of «spiny Solanum» (Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum, Solanaceae). Genetica, 132(2), 143-158. doi:10.1007/s10709-007-9156-3Nairismägi, M.-L., Tan, J., Lim, J. Q., Nagarajan, S., Ng, C. C. Y., Rajasegaran, V., … Ong, C. K. (2016). JAK-STAT and G-protein-coupled receptor signaling pathways are frequently altered in epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma. Leukemia, 30(6), 1311-1319. doi:10.1038/leu.2016.13Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A., & Minh, B. Q. (2014). IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32(1), 268-274. doi:10.1093/molbev/msu300Pailles, Y., Ho, S., Pires, I. S., Tester, M., Negrão, S., & Schmöckel, S. M. (2017). Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Two Tomato Species from the Galapagos Islands. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00138Herraiz, F. J., Blanca, J., Ziarsolo, P., Gramazio, P., Plazas, M., Anderson, G. J., … Vilanova, S. (2016). The first de novo transcriptome of pepino (Solanum muricatum): assembly, comprehensive analysis and comparison with the closely related species S. caripense, potato and tomato. BMC Genomics, 17(1). doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2656-8Plazas, M., Andújar, I., Vilanova, S., Gramazio, P., Herraiz, F. J., & Prohens, J. (2014). Conventional and phenomics characterization provides insight into the diversity and relationships of hypervariable scarlet (Solanum aethiopicum L.) and gboma (S. macrocarpon L.) eggplant complexes. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5. doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00318Plazas, M., Vilanova, S., Gramazio, P., Rodríguez-Burruezo, A., Fita, A., Herraiz, F. J., … Prohens, J. (2016). Interspecific Hybridization between Eggplant and Wild Relatives from Different Genepools. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 141(1), 34-44. doi:10.21273/jashs.141.1.34Poplin, R., Ruano-Rubio, V., DePristo, M. A., Fennell, T. J., Carneiro, M. O., Van der Auwera, G. A., … Banks, E. (2017). Scaling accurate genetic variant discovery to tens of thousands of samples. doi:10.1101/201178Razali, R., Bougouffa, S., Morton, M. J. L., Lightfoot, D. J., Alam, I., Essack, M., … Negrão, S. (2018). The Genome Sequence of the Wild Tomato Solanum pimpinellifolium Provides Insights Into Salinity Tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01402Robinson, D. F., & Foulds, L. R. (1981). Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Mathematical Biosciences, 53(1-2), 131-147. doi:10.1016/0025-5564(81)90043-2Rodriguez, F., Wu, F., Ané, C., Tanksley, S., & Spooner, D. M. (2009). Do potatoes and tomatoes have a single evolutionary history, and what proportion of the genome supports this history? BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9(1), 191. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-191Sakata, Y., & Lester, R. N. (1997). Euphytica, 97(3), 295-301. doi:10.1023/a:1003000612441Sakata, Y., Nishio, T., & Matthews, P. J. (1991). Chloroplast DNA analysis of eggplant (Solanum melongena) and related species for their taxonomic affinity. Euphytica, 55(1), 21-26. doi:10.1007/bf00022555Särkinen, T., Bohs, L., Olmstead, R. G., & Knapp, S. (2013). A phylogenetic framework for evolutionary study of the nightshades (Solanaceae): a dated 1000-tip tree. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 13(1), 214. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-214Scaglione, D., Pinosio, S., Marroni, F., Di Centa, E., Fornasiero, A., Magris, G., … Morgante, M. (2019). Single primer enrichment technology as a tool for massive genotyping: a benchmark on black poplar and maize. Annals of Botany, 124(4), 543-551. doi:10.1093/aob/mcz054Scheben, A., Batley, J., & Edwards, D. (2017). Genotyping-by-sequencing approaches to characterize crop genomes: choosing the right tool for the right application. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 15(2), 149-161. doi:10.1111/pbi.12645Scolnick, J. A., Dimon, M., Wang, I.-C., Huelga, S. C., & Amorese, D. A. (2015). An Efficient Method for Identifying Gene Fusions by Targeted RNA Sequencing from Fresh Frozen and FFPE Samples. PLOS ONE, 10(7), e0128916. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128916Semagn, K., Babu, R., Hearne, S., & Olsen, M. (2013). Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping using Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP): overview of the technology and its application in crop improvement. Molecular Breeding, 33(1), 1-14. doi:10.1007/s11032-013-9917-xSim, S.-C., Van Deynze, A., Stoffel, K., Douches, D. S., Zarka, D., Ganal, M. W., … Francis, D. M. (2012). High-Density SNP Genotyping of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Reveals Patterns of Genetic Variation Due to Breeding. PLoS ONE, 7(9), e45520. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045520Syfert, M. M., Castañeda-Álvarez, N. P., Khoury, C. K., Särkinen, T., Sosa, C. C., Achicanoy, H. A., … Knapp, S. (2016). Crop wild relatives of the brinjal eggplant (Solanum melongena): Poorly represented in genebanks and many species at risk of extinction. American Journal of Botany, 103(4), 635-651. doi:10.3732/ajb.1500539(2012). The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature, 485(7400), 635-641. doi:10.1038/nature11119Thomson, R. C., & Shaffer, H. B. (2010). Sparse Supermatrices for Phylogenetic Inference: Taxonomy, Alignment, Rogue Taxa, and the Phylogeny of Living Turtles. Systematic Biology, 59(1), 42-58. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp075Tranchida-Lombardo, V., Mercati, F., Avino, M., Punzo, P., Fiore, M. C., Poma, I., … Grillo, S. (2018). Genetic diversity in a collection of Italian long storage tomato landraces as revealed by SNP markers array. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 153(2), 288-297. doi:10.1080/11263504.2018.1478900Vilanova, S., Manzur, J. P., & Prohens, J. (2011). Development and characterization of genomic simple sequence repeat markers in eggplant and their application to the study of diversity and relationships in a collection of different cultivar types and origins. Molecular Breeding, 30(2), 647-660. doi:10.1007/s11032-011-9650-2Vorontsova, M. S., Stern, S., Bohs, L., & Knapp, S. (2013). African spinySolanum(subgenusLeptostemonum, Solanaceae): a thorny phylogenetic tangle. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 173(2), 176-193. doi:10.1111/boj.12053Weese, T. L., & Bohs, L. (2010). Eggplant origins: Out of Africa, into the Orient. TAXON, 59(1), 49-56. doi:10.1002/tax.591006Tan, M. H., Gan, H. M., Schultz, M. B., & Austin, C. M. (2015). MitoPhAST, a new automated mitogenomic phylogeny tool in the post-genomic era with a case study of 89 decapod mitogenomes including eight new freshwater crayfish mitogenomes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 85, 180-188. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2015.02.009Wiens, J. J., & Morrill, M. C. (2011). Missing Data in Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconciling Results from Simulations and Empirical Data. Systematic Biology, 60(5), 719-731. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr025Williams, C. E., & Clair, D. A. S. (1993). Phenetic relationships and levels of variability detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of cultivated and wild accessions of Lycopersicon esculentum. Genome, 36(3), 619-630. doi:10.1139/g93-083Zheng, X., Levine, D., Shen, J., Gogarten, S. M., Laurie, C., & Weir, B. S. (2012). A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data. Bioinformatics, 28(24), 3326-3328. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts60

Identification of SNP and SSR markers in eggplant using RAD tag sequencing

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The eggplant (<it>Solanum melongena </it>L.) genome is relatively unexplored, especially compared to those of the other major <it>Solanaceae </it>crops tomato and potato. In particular, no SNP markers are publicly available; on the other hand, over 1,000 SSR markers were developed and publicly available. We have combined the recently developed Restriction-site Associated DNA (RAD) approach with Illumina DNA sequencing for rapid and mass discovery of both SNP and SSR markers for eggplant.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>RAD tags were generated from the genomic DNA of a pair of eggplant mapping parents, and sequenced to produce ~17.5 Mb of sequences arrangeable into ~78,000 contigs. The resulting non-redundant genomic sequence dataset consisted of ~45,000 sequences, of which ~29% were putative coding sequences and ~70% were in common between the mapping parents. The shared sequences allowed the discovery of ~10,000 SNPs and nearly 1,000 indels, equivalent to a SNP frequency of 0.8 per Kb and an indel frequency of 0.07 per Kb. Over 2,000 of the SNPs are likely to be mappable via the Illumina GoldenGate assay. A subset of 384 SNPs was used to successfully fingerprint a panel of eggplant germplasm, producing a set of informative diversity data. The RAD sequences also included nearly 2,000 putative SSRs, and primer pairs were designed to amplify 1,155 loci.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The high throughput sequencing of the RAD tags allowed the discovery of a large number of DNA markers, which will prove useful for extending our current knowledge of the genome organization of eggplant, for assisting in marker-aided selection and for carrying out comparative genomic analyses within the <it>Solanaceae </it>family.</p

A SmelAAT Acyltransferase Variant Causes a Major Difference in Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) Peel Anthocyanin Composition

Eggplant berries are rich in anthocyanins like delphinidin-3-rutinoside (D3R) and nasunin (NAS), which are accumulated at high amounts in the peel. NAS is derived by D3R through acylation and glycosylation steps. The presence of D3R or NAS is usually associated with black-purple or lilac fruit coloration of the most cultivated varieties, respectively. Building on QTL mapping position, a candidate gene approach was used to investigate the involvement of a BAHD anthocyanin acyltransferase (SmelAAT) in determining anthocyanin type. The cDNA sequence comparison revealed the presence of a single-base deletion in D3R-type line ‘305E40’ (305E40_aat) with respect to the NAS-type reference line ‘67/3’. This is predicted to cause a frame shift mutation, leading to a loss of SmelAAT function and, thus, D3R retention. RT-qPCR analyses confirmed SmelAAT and 305E40_aat expression during berry maturation. In D3R-type lines, ‘305E40’ and ‘DR2’, overexpressing the functional SmelAAT allele from ‘67/3’, the transcript levels of the transgene correlated with the accumulation of NAS in fruit peel. Furthermore, it was also found a higher expression of the transcript for glucosyltransferase Smel5GT1, putatively involved with SmelAAT in the last steps of anthocyanin decoration. Finally, an indel marker matching with anthocyanin type in the ‘305E40’ × ’67/3’ segregating population was developed and validated in a wide number of accessions, proving its usefulness for breeding purposes