14 research outputs found

    Horses with equine recurrent uveitis have an activated CD4+ T-cell phenotype that can be modulated by mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.

    Get PDF
    Equine recurrent uveitis (ERU) is an immune-mediated disease causing repeated or persistent inflammatory episodes which can lead to blindness. Currently, there is no cure for horses with this disease. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are effective at reducing immune cell activation in vitro in many species, making them a potential therapeutic option for ERU. The objectives of this study were to define the lymphocyte phenotype of horses with ERU and to determine how MSCs alter T-cell phenotype in vitro. Whole blood was taken from 7 horses with ERU and 10 healthy horses and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated. The markers CD21, CD3, CD4, and CD8 were used to identify lymphocyte subsets while CD25, CD62L, Foxp3, IFNγ, and IL10 were used to identify T-cell phenotype. Adipose-derived MSCs were expanded, irradiated (to control proliferation), and incubated with CD4+ T-cells from healthy horses, after which lymphocytes were collected and analyzed via flow cytometry. The percentages of T-cells and B-cells in horses with ERU were similar to normal horses. However, CD4+ T-cells from horses with ERU expressed higher amounts of IFNγ indicating a pro-inflammatory Th1 phenotype. When co-incubated with MSCs, activated CD4+ T-cells reduced expression of CD25, CD62L, Foxp3, and IFNγ. MSCs had a lesser ability to decrease activation when cell-cell contact or prostaglandin signaling was blocked. MSCs continue to show promise as a treatment for ERU as they decreased the CD4+ T-cell activation phenotype through a combination of cell-cell contact and prostaglandin signaling

    Constraints on similarity as a constraint on induction.

    Full text link
    For psychologists, the problem of induction has to do with distinguishing between generalizations people are likely to make and those that they are not. Similarity, an important construct in categorization, analogy, and problem solving, has been proposed as a constraint on induction. Feature models have been used to define the role played by similarity in influencing inductive inference. This thesis focuses on similarity of relational structure as an inductive constraint, as well as on overlap of features, which has been the focus of much previous work on the role of similarity in induction. In Experiment 1, inductive inferences were more likely to the extent that two concepts shared commonalities, and were less likely to the extent that concepts had differences. These results are consistent with predictions of feature models of similarity. Using novel concepts as stimuli, subjects either (1) rated the probability of conclusions for arguments that varied in the number of commonalities and differences between concepts contained in the premise, or (2) rated the similarity of the same set of concepts. Both likelihood judgments and similarity ratings increased with the number of commonalities between the two concepts. Experiments 2-4 evaluated a structural view of similarity that distinguishes between attributes and relations as an inductive constraint. This distinction is not made by feature models of similarity. In these experiments, similarity was decomposed into attributes and relations. Results show that for a relation to influence the perceived similarity between base and target concepts, it must be shared. Conversely, for a relation to influence the inductive strength of an argument, it must connect an attribute shared by the base and target concepts to the attribute being mapped from base to target. In other words, shared attributes and relations matter for similarity; shared attributes and the connectivity of mapped to shared features matters for induction. Experiments 5-7 extended results of Experiment 2-4, which used a causal relation, to arguments involving a relation of developmental precedence. A final experiment generalized results of earlier studies to familiar natural categories.Ph.D.PsychologyUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/104162/1/9500978.pdfDescription of 9500978.pdf : Restricted to UM users only
    corecore