Coherent backscattering of ultrasound without a source

Coherent backscattering is due to constructive interferences of reciprocal paths and leads to an enhancement of the intensity of a multiply scattered field near its source. To observe this enhancement an array of receivers is conventionally placed close to the source. Our approach here is different. In a first experiment, we recover the coherent backscattering effect (CBE) within an array of sources and a distant receiver using time correlation of diffuse fields. The enhancement cone has an excellent spatial resolution. The dynamics of the enhancement factor is studied in a second experiment using correlation of thermal phonons at the same ultrasonic frequencies, without any active source

Locating structural changes in a multiple scattering domain with an irregular shape

International audienceLocadiff is a method for imaging local structural changes in a random, heterogeneous medium. It relies on the combination of a forward model to calculate the sensitivity kernel of the source-receiver pairs, with an inversion method to determine the position of the changes. So far, the sensitivity kernel has been evaluated based on an analytical solution of the diffusion equation, which lacks the flexibility to handle problems where the domain has boundaries with an irregular shape. Moreover, the accuracy of the previous inversion method, based on linear algebra tools, was very sensitive to the values of the inversion parameters. This paper introduces a more generic approach to solve both these issues. The first problem is tackled by the implementation of numerical method as an alternative for solving the diffusion equation. The second problem is tackled by the introduction of enhanced optimization algorithms to improve the stability of the inversion. This improved version of Locadiff is validated via both numerical examples and experimental data from an actual civil engineering problem

Stability of Monitoring Weak Changes in Multiply Scattering Media with Ambient Noise Correlation: Laboratory Experiments

Previous studies have shown that small changes can be monitored in a scattering medium by observing phase shifts in the coda. Passive monitoring of weak changes through ambient noise correlation has already been applied to seismology, acoustics and engineering. Usually, this is done under the assumption that a properly reconstructed Green function as well as stable background noise sources are necessary. In order to further develop this monitoring technique, a laboratory experiment was performed in the 2.5MHz range in a gel with scattering inclusions, comparing an active (pulse-echo) form of monitoring to a passive (correlation) one. Present results show that temperature changes in the medium can be observed even if the Green function (GF) of the medium is not reconstructed. Moreover, this article establishes that the GF reconstruction in the correlations is not a necessary condition: the only condition to monitoring with correlation (passive experiment) is the relative stability of the background noise structure

Fluctuations of correlations and Green's function reconstruction: role of scattering

Correlations of ambient seismic or acoustic vibrations are now widely used to reconstruct the impulse response between two passive receivers as if a source was placed at one of them. This provides the opportunity to do imaging without a source, or \textsl{passive imaging}. Applications include terrestrial and solar seismology, underwater acoustics, and structural health monitoring, to cite only a few. Nevertheless, for a given set of data, correlations do not only yield the Green's function between the sensors. They also contain residual fluctuations that result from an imperfect time or source averaging that might eventually blur the images. In this article, we propose a heuristic model to describe the level of fluctuations of the correlations in the case of non-stationary wavefields, and more particularly in the case of scattering media. The work includes theoretical derivations and numerical simulations. The role of multiple scattering is quantitatively evaluated. The level of fluctuations decreases when the duration and intensity of the diffuse waves increase. The role of absorption is also discussed: absorption is properly retrieved by correlation, but the level of fluctuations is greater, thus degrading the Green's function reconstruction. Discrepancies of our simple model in the case of strong multiple scattering ($k\ell^*\leq 18$) are discussed

Tracking fluids in multiple scattering and highly porous materials: toward applications in non-destructive testing and seismic monitoring

International audienceSeismic and ultrasonic waves are sometimes used to track fluid injections, propagation, infiltrations in complex material, including geological and civil engineered ones. In most cases, one use the acoustic velocity changes as a proxy for water content evolution. Here we propose to test an alternative seismic or acoustic observable : the waveform decorrelation. We use a sample of compacted millimetric sand as a model medium of highly porous multiple scattering materials. We fill iteratively the sample with water, and track changes in ultrasonic waveforms acquired for each water level. We take advantage of the high sensitivity of diffuse coda waves (late arrivals) to track small water elevation in the material. We demonstrate that in the mesoscopic regime where the wavelength, the grain size and the porosity are in the same order of magnitude, Coda Wave Decorrelation (waveform change) is more sensitive to fluid injection than Coda Wave Interferometry (apparent velocity change). This observation is crucial to interpret fluid infiltration in concrete with ultrasonic record changes, as well as fluid injection in volcanoes or snow melt infiltration in rocky glaciers. In these applications, Coda Wave Decorrelation might be an extremely interesting tool for damage assessment and alert systems

Monitoring Local Changes in Granite Rock Under Biaxial Test: A Spatiotemporal Imaging Application With Diffuse Waves

International audienceDiffuse acoustic or seismic waves are highly sensitive to detect changes of mechanical properties in heterogeneous geological materials. In particular, thanks to acousto-elasticity, we can quantify stress changes by tracking acoustic or seismic relative velocity changes in the material at test.In this paper, we report on a small-scale laboratory application of an innovative time-lapse tomography technique named Locadiff to image spatio-temporal mechanical changes on a granite sample under biaxial loading, using diffuse waves at ultrasonic frequencies ( 300 kHz to 900 kHz). We demonstrate the ability of the method to image reversible stress evolution and deformation process, together with the development of reversible and irreversible localized micro-damage in the specimen at an early stage. Using full-field infrared thermography, we visualize stress induced temperature changes and validate stress images obtained from diffuse ultrasound. We demonstrate that the inversion with a good resolution can be achieved with only a limited number of receivers distributed around a single source, all located at the free surface of the specimen. This small-scale experiment is a proof of concept for frictional earthquake-like failure (e.g. stick slip) research at laboratory scale as well as large scale seismic applications, potentially including active fault monitoring

Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The effective orifice area (EOA) estimated by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) via the continuity equation is commonly used to determine the severity of aortic stenosis (AS). However, there are often discrepancies between TTE-derived EOA and invasive indices of stenosis, thus raising uncertainty about actual definite severity. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as an alternative method for non-invasive estimation of valve EOA. The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between TTE and CMR for the estimation of valve EOA.</p> <p>Methods and results</p> <p>31 patients with mild to severe AS (EOA range: 0.72 to 1.73 cm²) and seven (7) healthy control subjects with normal transvalvular flow rate underwent TTE and velocity-encoded CMR. Valve EOA was calculated by the continuity equation. CMR revealed that the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) cross-section is typically oval and not circular. As a consequence, TTE underestimated the LVOT cross-sectional area (A_LVOT, 3.84 ± 0.80 cm²) compared to CMR (4.78 ± 1.05 cm²). On the other hand, TTE overestimated the LVOT velocity-time integral (VTI_LVOT: 21 ± 4 vs. 15 ± 4 cm). Good concordance was observed between TTE and CMR for estimation of aortic jet VTI (61 ± 22 vs. 57 ± 20 cm). Overall, there was a good correlation and concordance between TTE-derived and CMR-derived EOAs (1.53 ± 0.67 vs. 1.59 ± 0.73 cm², r = 0.92, bias = 0.06 ± 0.29 cm²). The intra- and inter- observer variability of TTE-derived EOA was 5 ± 5% and 9 ± 5%, respectively, compared to 2 ± 1% and 7 ± 5% for CMR-derived EOA.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Underestimation of A_LVOTby TTE is compensated by overestimation of VTI_LVOT, thereby resulting in a good concordance between TTE and CMR for estimation of aortic valve EOA. CMR was associated with less intra- and inter- observer measurement variability compared to TTE. CMR provides a non-invasive and reliable alternative to Doppler-echocardiography for the quantification of AS severity.</p

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using single plane measurement of effective orifice area

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the standard method for the evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis (AS). Valve effective orifice area (EOA) measured by the continuity equation is one of the most frequently used stenotic indices. However, TTE measurement of aortic valve EOA is not feasible or not reliable in a significant proportion of patients. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as a non-invasive alternative to evaluate EOA using velocity measurements. The objectives of this study were: 1) to validate a new CMR method using jet shear layer detection (JSLD) based on acoustical source term (AST) concept to estimate the valve EOA; 2) to introduce a simplified JSLD method not requiring vorticity field derivation.</p> <p>Methods and results</p> <p>We performed an in vitro study where EOA was measured by CMR in 4 fixed stenoses (EOA = 0.48, 1.00, 1.38 and 2.11 cm²) under the same steady flow conditions (4-20 L/min). The in vivo study included eight (8) healthy subjects and 37 patients with mild to severe AS (0.72 cm²≤ EOA ≤ 1.71 cm²). All subjects underwent TTE and CMR examinations. EOA was determinated by TTE with the use of continuity equation method (TTE_CONT). For CMR estimation of EOA, we used 3 methods: 1) Continuity equation (CMR_CONT); 2) Shear layer detection (CMR_JSLD), which was computed from the velocity field of a single CMR velocity profile at the peak systolic phase; 3) Single plane velocity truncation (CMR_SPVT), which is a simplified version of CMR_JSLDmethod. There was a good agreement between the EOAs obtained in vitro by the different CMR methods and the EOA predicted from the potential flow theory. In the in vivo study, there was good correlation and concordance between the EOA measured by the TTE_CONTmethod versus those measured by each of the CMR methods: CMR_CONT(r = 0.88), CMR_JSLD(r = 0.93) and CMR_SPVT(r = 0.93). The intra- and inter- observer variability of EOA measurements was 5 ± 5% and 9 ± 5% for TTE_CONT, 2 ± 1% and 7 ± 5% for CMR_CONT, 7 ± 5% and 8 ± 7% for CMR_JSLD, 1 ± 2% and 3 ± 2% for CMR_SPVT. When repeating image acquisition, reproducibility of measurements was 10 ± 8% and 12 ± 5% for TTE_CONT, 9 ± 9% and 8 ± 8% for CMR_CONT, 6 ± 5% and 7 ± 4% for CMR_JSLDand 3 ± 2% and 2 ± 2% for CMR_SPVT.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>There was an excellent agreement between the EOA estimated by the CMR_JSLDor CMR_SPVTmethods and: 1) the theoretical EOA in vitro, and 2) the TTE_CONTEOA in vivo. The CMR_SPVTmethod was superior to the TTE and other CMR methods in terms of measurement variability. The novel CMR-based methods proposed in this study may be helpful to corroborate stenosis severity in patients for whom Doppler-echocardiography exam is inconclusive.</p