Supplement_selected_phylogenies

File describing how phylogenies were selected, and a list of all the papers from which phylogenies were selected

Supplement_TableS1

File containing the information extracted from the phylogenies in a table (comma delimited format)

Example on how geographic extents impact conclusions made in SDMs of <i>Falco subbuteo.</i>

<p><b>A</b>. Unrestricted extent versus, <b>B</b>. Restricted extent, and <b>C</b>. Results drawn from SDMs.</p

Mean effects of decisions made in SDM construction on six <i>Falco</i> species.

<p>The bold option highlights the best criteria applied to the study. Similarity is expressed in the average between the percentage of the predicted current range that lay within the published range, and the percentage of the published range that was covered by the predicted current range. The ‘percentage gained area’ and ‘trend’ are based upon the difference between current and future prediction.</p

Example on how threshold choice for distribution probabilities impact predictions of SDMs of <i>Falco subbuteo.</i>

<p>A. Threshold greater than 0.4, B. Threshold greater than 0.1, C. the estimates of lost, gained and stable (refugial) areas of <i>Falco subbuteo.</i></p

Example on how occurrence data can alter predictions of SDMs.

<p><b>A</b>. Biased occurrence, versus <b>B</b>. Unbiased occurrence data affect the present and future SDM projections for <i>Falco subbuteo</i>, summarized in panel <b>C</b>.</p

Schematic framework for generating, validating and processing SDMs for studying effects of climate on biodiversity.

<p>Schematic framework for generating, validating and processing SDMs for studying effects of climate on biodiversity.</p