Evaluación de calidad de agua en un sistema ribereño utilizado para riego agrícola de subsistencia

En la evaluación del impacto de la contaminación en el ambiente, existen diversas herramientas y técnicas que se aplican para conocer la calidad ambiental de los recursos naturales. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la calidad del agua en un sistema ribereño en San Luis Potosí, México asociado al impacto del uso agrícola, urbano e industrial. Fueron establecidos cinco puntos de muestreo asociado a diversos usos y descargas residuales en donde se evaluaron 28 muestras durante cuatro días de muestro. Estas fueron distribuidas a los 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 y 120 minutos del trayecto determinando con un medidor multiparámetro los sólidos disueltos totales (SDT), temperatura (T), conductividad eléctrica (CE), pH y oxígeno disuelto (OD). El resultado más destacado de las 28 muestras diarias y del total de 112 que los promedios oxígeno disuelto indican condición hipoxia que indica la desaparición de organismos y especies sensibles, concluyendo que el área ribereña requiere un constante monitoreo y diversificación de parámetros para evaluar su condición para actividades agrícolas.In the assessment of the impact of pollution on the environment, there are various tools and techniques that are applied to know the environmental quality of natural resources. The objective of this work was to evaluate water quality in a river system in San Luis Potosí, Mexico associated with the impact of agricultural, urban and industrial use. Five sampling points associated to various uses and residual discharges were established where 28 samples were evaluated during four days of sampling. The total dissolved solids (SDT), temperature (T), electrical conductivity (CE), pH and dissolved oxygen (OD) were distributed at 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 minutes of the path. The most outstanding result of the 28 daily samples and the total of 112 that dissolved oxygen averages indicate hypoxia condition indicating the disappearance of sensitive organisms and species, concluding that the riparian area requires constant monitoring and diversification of parameters to evaluate agricultural activities.Fil: Alcalá Jáuregui, J. A. Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí. Facultad de AgronomíaFil: Acosta Doporto Geiler, A. Instituto Tecnológico Superior de los Ríos de Balancan (México)Fil: Rodríguez Ortiz, J.C. Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí. Facultad de AgronomíaFil: Hernández Montoya, A. Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí. Facultad de AgronomíaFil: Martínez Carretero, Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasFil: Filippini, Maria Flavia. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias AgrariasFil: Díaz Flores, P. E. Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí. Facultad de AgronomíaFil: Lara Mireles, J. L. Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí. Facultad de Agronomí

Soil Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Phytoextraction of Cadmium and Lead by Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) QUERY SHEET Soil Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Phytoextraction of Cadmium and Lead by Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) R. Magallanes-Quintanar

ABSTRACT A greenhouse experiment using 24 plastic pots filled with 6 kg of Pb-and Cd-contaminated soil was carried out. In all 24 pots, soils were heavy metal-contaminated with 10 mg Cd kg −1 soil and 500 mg of Pb kg −1 soil b

Perception of Treatment Success and Impact on Function with Antibiotics or Appendectomy for Appendicitis

ObjectiveTo compare secondary patient reported outcomes of perceptions of treatment success and function for patients treated for appendicitis with appendectomy vs. antibiotics at 30 days.Summary background dataThe Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy trial found antibiotics noninferior to appendectomy based on 30-day health status. To address questions about outcomes among participants with lower socioeconomic status, we explored the relationship of sociodemographic and clinical factors and outcomes.MethodsWe focused on 4 patient reported outcomes at 30 days: high decisional regret, dissatisfaction with treatment, problems performing usual activities, and missing >10 days of work. The randomized (RCT) and observational cohorts were pooled for exploration of baseline factors. The RCT cohort alone was used for comparison of treatments. Logistic regression was used to assess associations.ResultsThe pooled cohort contained 2062 participants; 1552 from the RCT. Overall, regret and dissatisfaction were low whereas problems with usual activities and prolonged missed work occurred more frequently. In the RCT, those assigned to antibiotics had more regret (Odd ratios (OR) 2.97, 95% Confidence intervals (CI) 2.05-4.31) and dissatisfaction (OR 1.98, 95%CI 1.25-3.12), and reported less missed work (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.27-0.56). Factors associated with function outcomes included sociodemographic and clinical variables for both treatment arms. Fewer factors were associated with dissatisfaction and regret.ConclusionsOverall, participants reported high satisfaction, low regret, and were frequently able to resume usual activities and return to work. When comparing treatments for appendicitis, no single measure defines success or failure for all people. The reported data may inform discussions regarding the most appropriate treatment for individuals.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02800785