Syncretism or correlation: Teilhard and Tillich's contrasting methodological approaches to science and theology

This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the article, published in Zygon 40(3) pp.739-750, which has been published in final form at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118699350/issueThis paper revisits Paul Tillich’s theological methodology, and contrasts his practice of correlation with the syncretistic methodological practices of Teilhard de Chardin. I argue that the method of correlation, as referred to in Robert John Russell’s 2001 Zygon article, fails to uphold Tillich’s self-limitation of his own methodology with regard to Tillich’s insistence upon the theological circle. I assert that the theological circle, as taken from Systematic Theology I, is a central facet within Tillich’s methodology and that this often ignored concept needs to be resuscitated if one is to remain authentically Tillichian in one’s approach to the science and theology dialogue

Maker of heaven and earth: A Study of The Christian doctrine of creation

Garden City311 p.; 21 c

Naming the Whirlwind The Renewal of God-Language

New Yorkix, 483 p.; 21 c

Nature, Reality, and the Sacred : The Nexus of Science and Religion

Minneapolisxii, 266 p.; 23 c

Naming the Whirlwind : The Renewal of God-Language

New Yorkx, 483 p.; 21 c

Cosmology, Ontology, and the Travail of Biblical Language

This is a paper on the intelligibility of some of the concepts of what we commonly call biblical theology, or sometimes the biblical point of view, or the biblical faith. Although my remarks relate only to the Old Testament and at some points concern only two distinguished American representatives of the biblical viewpoint, G. E. Wright and B. Anderson, the number of scholars of both testaments whose thoughts are based on the so-called biblical view, and so who share the difficulties outlined below, is very great indeed