Calibration Procedure for Fuel Flow Meters at the Nebraska Tractor Test Lab

Reports in the literature indicated several factors that can influence the accuracy of Coriolis Effect mass flow meters. A Coriolis Effect mass flow meter is used to verify tractor manufacturer’s fuel consumption claims at the Nebraska Tractor Test Laboratory (NTTL). The accuracy requirement placed on the flow meter by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in the Code 2 tractor performance test procedure is not clear, but in the most conservative interpretation is ±0.5% of each flow rate measured. Results showed a dynamic weighing calibration method was not accurate enough to obtain a calibration of the flow meter to the desired accuracy level. A static weighing calibration method developed showed no significant difference between the calibration determined by the flow meter’s manufacturer with water and the calibration determined by NTTL with No. 2 diesel fuel. Static weighing calibration tests showed that for flow rates at or above 32 kg/h, the flow meter met the ±0.5% error most conservative interpretation of tolerance on flow rate from OECD Code 2

Calibration Procedure for Fuel Flow Meters at the Nebraska Tractor Test Lab

Reports in the literature indicated several factors that can influence the accuracy of Coriolis Effect mass flow meters. A Coriolis Effect mass flow meter is used to verify tractor manufacturer’s fuel consumption claims at the Nebraska Tractor Test Laboratory (NTTL). The accuracy requirement placed on the flow meter by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in the Code 2 tractor performance test procedure is not clear, but in the most conservative interpretation is ±0.5% of each flow rate measured. Results showed a dynamic weighing calibration method was not accurate enough to obtain a calibration of the flow meter to the desired accuracy level. A static weighing calibration method developed showed no significant difference between the calibration determined by the flow meter’s manufacturer with water and the calibration determined by NTTL with No. 2 diesel fuel. Static weighing calibration tests showed that for flow rates at or above 32 kg/h, the flow meter met the ±0.5% error most conservative interpretation of tolerance on flow rate from OECD Code 2

Implementation of a ”Rapid Design Challenge” in a Cross-Disciplinary Senior Capstone Course and Evaluation of Device Performance

The senior capstone experience within the Department of Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln is a two-semester, two-course sequence intended to give senior students realistic design experience, working with real projects, real clients, faculty consultants, and teammates to produce a deliverable that meets the client’s needs. Students within this course sequence come from two different degree programs (agricultural engineering and biological systems engineering) and within each degree program from a variety of “emphasis areas”, e.g. biomedical engineering, environmental engineering, machine design. While the goal of this course is for students to experience a “real” design project, we felt that we needed to improve this senior design sequence with an exercise that forced all students through a shared and “complete” design process to help address some of the challenges associated with a crossdisciplinary capstone course. Therefore, beginning in 2010, a two-week, rapid design challenge was implemented at the beginning of the senior capstone design experience, based on a similar challenge developed at Bucknell University1. This abbreviated design experience challenges the students to rapidly learn and implement the basic steps of design to produce a functional prototype, which is displayed and tested during a design challenge competition. The challenge presented to students is to design and build a device for a third-world clinic to infuse a cholera treatment solution, at a specific flow rate and time for injection, with specific technical constraints. During this two-week challenge, multiple assignments help move the students through each phase of the design process. Teams are given a budget and time to build, test, and iterate their design before the final competition between teams. The team with a device that most closely achieves the dictated criteria wins the competition. To evaluate the performance of each team, a National Instruments (NI) data acquisition system was developed, which combines NI LabVIEW software and two Micro Motion Coriolis flow meters. The system evaluates multiple parameters of the design, and combines the data with faculty judge evaluations to calculate an overall score. Team scores are displayed on a digital scoreboard throughout the competition. The Rapid Design Challenge (RDC) is then used as an example to introduce future topics in the course. Finally, the RDC has been critically evaluated over four semesters of implementation as part of the continuous improvement and assessment process. This exercise has revitalized the course and ensured that all students share a common and successful design experience

Psychosocial interventions promoting personal recovery in people with schizophrenia: a scoping review protocol

Introduction Personal recovery is an important aspect for many individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, as people can live rich, fulfilling lives despite ongoing symptoms. Prior reviews have found several factors to be associated with personal recovery, but a comprehensive overview of the psychosocial interventions aimed at improving personal recovery in schizophrenia is needed.Methods and analysis Key terms relating to personal recovery and psychosocial interventions to promote personal recovery will be searched for in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane. Additionally, a simple search for grey literature will be conducted in The Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations. Two reviewers will individually screen and extract the data, and the selection of sources will be documented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart. A content analysis will be conducted on the data, and the findings will be presented in tables, and narratively synthesised. Lastly, research gaps will be identified, and recommendations for future research will be proposed.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was not required for the development or publishing of this protocol. Findings will be disseminated through conferences, meeting with patient organisations and consumers, and published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal

Clinical evidence based review and recommendations of aerosol generating medical procedures in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background: Aerosol generating medical procedures (AGMPs) present risks to health care workers (HCW) due to airborne transmission of pathogens. During the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential for HCWs to recognize which procedures are potentially aerosolizing so that appropriate infection prevention precautions can be taken. The aim of this literature review was to identify potential AGMPs in Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery and provide evidence-based recommendations. Methods: A literature search was performed on Medline, Embase and Cochrane Review databases up to April 3, 2020. All titles and abstracts of retrieved studies were evaluated and all studies mentioning potential AGMPs were included for formal review. Full text of included studies were assessed by two reviewers and the quality of the studies was evaluated. Ten categories of potential AGMPs were developed and recommendations were provided for each category. Results: Direct evidence indicates that CO2 laser ablation, the use of high-speed rotating devices, electrocautery and endotracheal suctioning are AGMPs. Indirect evidence indicates that tracheostomy should be considered as potential AGMPs. Nasal endoscopy and nasal packing/epistaxis management can result in droplet transmission, but it is unknown if these procedures also carry the risk of airborne transmission. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, special care should be taken when CO2 lasers, electrocautery and high-speed rotating devices are used in potentially infected tissue. Tracheal procedures like tracheostomy and endotracheal suctioning can also result in airborne transmission via small virus containing aerosols.Medicine, Faculty ofNon UBCSurgery, Department ofReviewedFacult