7 research outputs found
Comparative study of the radiosensitising and cell cycle effects of vinflunine and vinorelbine, in vitro
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Vinca alkaloids are an important class of anticancer agents and semisynthetic vinca alkaloids are developed to improve the therapeutic index of this class of drugs. In the present study, a direct comparison was made between vinflunine and vinorelbine regarding their radiosensitising and cell cycle effects.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Four human tumour cell lines were tested under identical experimental conditions, using equitoxic concentrations of vinflunine and vinorelbine.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Vinflunine and vinorelbine induced a comparable radiosensitising effect (p-value never below 0.01) when cells were incubated for 24 h immediately prior to radiation. Regarding the cell cycle effects, a statistically significant concentration-dependent G2/M block was seen after 24 h incubation with vinorelbine in all tested cell lines. Similar results, with small cell line-related differences, were observed with vinflunine.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The radiosensitising effects of both semisynthetic vinca alkaloids were comparable (not statistically different) and nearly always cell line-specific and concentration-dependent. The cell cycle effects could be related to the observed radiosensitising effects. Considering the more favourable toxicity profile of vinflunine, this agent might be more promising than vinorelbine for chemoradiation studies in the clinic.</p
Pensamiento crítico en estudiantes del Grado de Educación Social
El presente artículo se centra en una investigación cualitativa sobre las creencias acerca del pensamiento crítico que poseen 72 estudiantes de tercer curso del Grado de Educación Social de la Universidad de Huelva (España). Los resultados, en consonancia con otras investigaciones, muestran que el alumnado tiene un conocimiento poco detallado aunque certero de lo que significa dicha competencia, ofreciendo explicaciones generales que van en acuerdo con las ideas que tienen acerca de la Universidad, la Sociedad y la finalidad de la Educación Social. La buena disposición que muestra la mayoría del alumnado investigado choca con escasos hábitos para el pensamiento crítico, achacándolo a una formación reproductiva, a la influencia perniciosa de determinados poderes sociales y a un no-saber-hacer-y-actuar de los futuros educadores sociales.This article focuses on qualitative research on the beliefs about critical thinking held by 72
third year students of the Social Education Degree of the University of Huelva (Spain). The results show that the students have a little detailed but accurate
knowledge of what this competence means, offering general explanations that are in
line with the ideas they have about the University, Society and the purpose of Social
Education. The willingness shown by the majority of the students researched clashes
with scarce habits for critical thinking, blaming it on reproductive training, the pernicious influence of certain social powers and the non-know-how-to-act of future social educators
In vitro study on the schedule-dependency of the interaction between pemetrexed, gemcitabine and irradiation in non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer cells
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Based on their different mechanisms of action, non-overlapping side effects and radiosensitising potential, combining the antimetabolites pemetrexed (multitargeted antifolate, MTA) and gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC) with irradiation (RT) seems promising. This <it>in vitro </it>study, for the first time, presents the triple combination of MTA, dFdC and irradiation using various treatment schedules.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The cytotoxicity, radiosensitising potential and cell cycle effect of MTA were investigated in A549 (NSCLC) and CAL-27 (SCCHN) cells. Using simultaneous or sequential exposure schedules, the cytotoxicity and radiosensitising effect of 24 h MTA combined with 1 h or 24 h dFdC were analysed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Including a time interval between MTA exposure and irradiation seemed favourable to MTA immediately preceding or following radiotherapy. MTA induced a significant S phase accumulation that persisted for more than 8 h after drug removal. Among different MTA/dFdC combinations tested, the highest synergistic interaction was produced by 24 h MTA followed by 1 h dFdC. Combined with irradiation, this schedule showed a clear radiosensitising effect.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Results from our <it>in vitro </it>model suggest that the sequence 24 h MTA → 1 h dFdC → RT is the most rational design and would, after confirmation in an <it>in vivo </it>setting, possibly provide the greatest benefit in the clinic.</p
Comparative study of the radiosensitising and cell cycle effects of vinflunine and vinorelbine, -3
during 4, 24 and 48 hours and 24 and 48 h after drug removal. FL-2A = DNA content. Events = number of fluorescent nuclei.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Comparative study of the radiosensitising and cell cycle effects of vinflunine and vinorelbine, "</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/65</p><p>BMC Cancer 2008;8():65-65.</p><p>Published online 29 Feb 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2311317.</p><p></p
Comparative study of the radiosensitising and cell cycle effects of vinflunine and vinorelbine, -2
E during 4, 24 and 48 hours and 24 and 48 h after drug removal. FL-2A = DNA content. Events = number of fluorescent nuclei.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Comparative study of the radiosensitising and cell cycle effects of vinflunine and vinorelbine, "</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/65</p><p>BMC Cancer 2008;8():65-65.</p><p>Published online 29 Feb 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2311317.</p><p></p
Comparative study of the radiosensitising and cell cycle effects of vinflunine and vinorelbine, -1
Ne during 4, 24 and 48 hours and 24 and 48 h after drug removal. FL-2A = DNA content. Events = number of fluorescent nuclei.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Comparative study of the radiosensitising and cell cycle effects of vinflunine and vinorelbine, "</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/65</p><p>BMC Cancer 2008;8():65-65.</p><p>Published online 29 Feb 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2311317.</p><p></p