Amélioration des services de génomiques et de surveillance du virus du syndrome reproducteur et respiratoire porcin

Le virus du syndrome reproducteur et respiratoire porcin (VSRRP) est un pathogène important, entrainant des pertes économiques de 130 millions de dollars annuellement au Canada. La surveillance est effectuée par séquençage Sanger du gène ORF5 mais nous croyons que le séquençage du génome entier (SGE) du VSRRP permettrait une meilleure surveillance épidémiologique comparé au séquençage du gène ORF5. Pour développer une méthode efficace de SGE du VSRRP, 149 échantillons (sérums, poumons, tissus, autres) d’animaux malades ou récoltés pour fin de surveillance ont été analysés. L'ARN viral a été concentré par enrichissement d'ARN à queue poly (A) et le séquençage effectué sur une plateforme Illumina. Le SGE a été efficace dans 67,11% des échantillons, réussissant dans certains échantillons de poumons et de sérums possédant une valeur de quantification (Cq) du virus par RTqPCR jusqu’à 26,50 et 34.13, respectivement. La méthodologie développée de SGE du VSRRP a été 4650 fois plus sensible que les méthodes décrites précédemment. Pour quantifier l’impact du SGE, 88 échantillons (dont le SGE a réussi) ont été utilisés pour comparer le SGE au séquençageORF5. Deux génomes de VSRRP différents ont été trouvés dans quatre échantillons différents (taux de coinfection de 4,55%). Six génomes de VSRRP (6,52% des souches) ont été classés différemment par rapport à la classification ORF5. Ainsi, le SGE du VSRRP a permis une meilleure caractérisation de 9,10% des échantillons VSRRP positifs comparé au séquençage ORF5. Donc, le SGE du VSRRP est à la fois sensible et plus précis que la classification par l’ORF5.Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is an important pathogen, costing over 130 million dollars annually in Canada. Surveillance is done by Sanger sequencing of the ORF5 gene, but we hypothesized that whole genome sequencing (WGS) of PRRSV genome will allow a better epidemiological monitoring of PRRSV compared to ORF5 gene sequencing. To develop an efficient method of PRRSV WGS, 149 PRRSV samples (sera, lungs, pool of tissues and others) collected for surveillance or from sick animals were tested. Viral RNA was concentrated using a poly(A) tailed RNA enrichment method, and sequencing was done on an Illumina platform. WGS was successful in 67.11% of cases. WGS was successful in some tissues and lungs samples with RT-qPCR cycle quantification (Cq) values up to 26.50, and in some sera with Cq value up to 34.13. The developed WGS methodology was 4650 times more sensitive for PRRSV WGS than previously described methods. To quantify the impact of WGS, 88 successful samples for the WGS of PRRSV were used to compare efficiency of WGS and ORF5 sequencing. Two different full-length genomes of PRRSV were found in four of those samples (coinfection rate of 4.55%). Six full-length PRRSV genomes (6.52% of PRRSV strains) were found to cluster differently compared to ORF5 sequencing. WGS of PRRSV also enabled a better classification or characterisation of 9.10% of the PRRSV infected samples compared to ORF5 sequencing. Thus, WGS can be both sensitive and more accurate then ORF5 classification for the characterisation of PRRSV strains

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus whole-genome sequencing efficacy with field clinical samples using a poly(A)-tail viral genome purification method

The genomic surveillance of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is based on sequencing of the ORF5 gene of the virus, which covers only 4% of the entire viral genome. It is expected that PRRSV whole-genome sequencing (WGS) will improve PRRSV genomic data and allow better understanding of clinical discrepancies observed in the field when using ORF5 sequencing. Our main objective was to implement an efficient method for WGS of PRRSV from clinical samples. The viral genome was purified using a poly(A)-tail viral genome purification method and sequenced using Illumina technology. We tested 149 PRRSV-positive samples: 80 sera, 33 lungs, 33 pools of tissues, 2 oral fluids, and 1 processing fluid (i.e., castration liquid). Overall, WGS of 67.1% of PRRSV-positive cases was successful. The viral load, in particular for tissues, had a major impact on the PRRSV WGS success rate. Serum was the most efficient type of sample to conduct PRRSV WGS poly(A)-tail assays, with a success rate of 76.3%, and this result can be explained by improved sequencing reads dispersion matching throughout the entire viral genome. WGS was unsuccessful for all pools of tissue and lung samples with Cq values > 26.5, whereas it could still be successful with sera at Cq ≤ 34.1. Evaluation of results of highly qualified personnel confirmed that laboratory skills could affect PRRSV WGS efficiency. Oral fluid samples seem very promising and merit further investigation because, with only 2 samples of low viral load (Cq = 28.8, 32.8), PRRSV WGS was successful

Whole genome sequencing of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 2 (PRRSV) from field clinical samples improves the genomic surveillance of the virus

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a major economic concern worldwide. There are currently large data sets available about the ORF5 gene of the virus, with thousands of sequences available, but little data are currently available on the full-length genome of PRRSV. We hypothesized that whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of the PRRSV genome would allow better epidemiological monitoring than ORF5 gene sequencing. PRRSV PCR-positive serum, oral fluid, and tissue clinical samples submitted to the diagnostic laboratory for routine surveillance or diagnosis of PRRSV infection in Québec, Canada, swine herds were used. The PRRSV reverse transcription-quantitative PCR Cq values of the processed samples varied between 11.5 and 34.34. PRRSV strain genomes were isolated using a poly (A)-tail method and were sequenced with a MiSeq Illumina sequencer. Ninetytwo full-length PRRSV genomes were obtained from 88 clinical samples out of 132 tested samples, resulting in a PRRSV WGS success rate of 66.67%. Three important deletions in ORF1a were found in most wild-type (i.e., not vaccine-like) strains. The importance of these deletions remains undetermined. Two different full-length PRRSV genomes were found in four different samples (three serum samples and one pool of tissues), suggesting a 4.55% PRRSV strain coinfection prevalence in swine. Moreover, six PRRSV whole genomes (6.52% of PRRSV strains) were found to cluster differently than they did under the ORF5 classification method. Overall, WGS of PRRSV enables better strain classification and/or interpretation of results in 9.10% of clinical samples than ORF5 sequencing, as well as allowing interesting research avenues

Comparison of primary virus isolation in pulmonary alveolar macrophages and four different continuous cell lines for type 1 and type 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) has a highly restricted cellular tropism. In vivo, the virus primarily infects tissue-specific macrophages in the nose, lungs, tonsils, and pharyngeal lymphoid tissues. In vitro however, the MARC-145 cell line is one of the few PRRSV susceptible cell lines that are routinely used for in vitro propagation. Previously, several PRRSV non-permissive cell lines were shown to become susceptible to PRRSV infection upon expression of recombinant entry receptors (e.g., PK15Sn-CD163, PK15S10-CD163). In the present study, we examined the suitability of different cell lines as a possible replacement of primary pulmonary alveolar macrophages (PAM) cells for isolation and growth of PRRSV. The susceptibility of four different cell lines (PK15Sn-CD163, PK15S10-CD163, MARC-145, and MARC-145Sn) for the primary isolation of PRRSV from PCR positive sera (both PRRSV1 and PRRSV2) was compared with that of PAM. To find possible correlations between the cell tropism and the viral genotype, 54 field samples were sequenced, and amino acid residues potentially associated with the cell tropism were identified. Regarding the virus titers obtained with the five different cell types, PAM gave the highest mean virus titers followed by PK15Sn-CD163, PK15S10-CD163, MARC-145Sn, and MARC-145. The titers in PK15Sn-CD163 and PK15S10-CD163 cells were significantly correlated with virus titers in PAM for both PRRSV1 (p < 0.001) and PRRSV2 (p < 0.001) compared with MARC-145Sn (PRRSV1: p = 0.22 and PRRSV2: p = 0.03) and MARC-145 (PRRSV1: p = 0.04 and PRRSV2: p = 0.12). Further, a possible correlation between cell tropism and viral genotype was assessed using PRRSV whole genome sequences in a Genome-Wide-Association Study (GWAS). The structural protein residues GP2:187L and N:28R within PRRSV2 sequences were associated with their growth in MARC-145. The GP5:78I residue for PRRSV2 and the Nsp11:155F residue for PRRSV1 was linked to a higher replication on PAM. In conclusion, PK15Sn-CD163 and PK15S10-CD163 cells are phenotypically closely related to the in vivo target macrophages and are more suitable for virus isolation and titration than MARC-145/MARC-145Sn cells. The residues of PRRSV proteins that are potentially related with cell tropism will be further investigated in the future