Inhibition of dendritic cell migration by transforming growth factor-β1 increases tumor-draining lymph node metastasis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β is known to be produced by progressor tumors and to immobilize dendritic cells (DCs) within those tumors. Moreover, although TGF-β1 has been shown to promote tumor progression, there is still no direct, in vivo evidence as to whether TGF-β1 is able to directly induce distant metastasis.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>To address that issue and investigate the mechanism by which TGF-β1 suppresses DC activity, we subdermally inoculated mouse ears with squamous cell carcinoma cells stably expressing TGF-β1 or empty vector (mock).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The numbers of DCs within lymph nodes draining the resultant TGF-β1-expressing tumors was significantly lower than within nodes draining tumors not expressing TGF-β1. We then injected fluorescently labeled bone marrow-derived dendritic cells into the tumors, and subsequent analysis confirmed that the tumors were the source of the DCs within the tumor-draining lymph nodes, and that there were significantly fewer immature DCs within the nodes draining TGF-β1-expressing tumors than within nodes draining tumors not expressing TGF-β1. In addition, 14 days after tumor cell inoculation, lymph node metastasis occurred more frequently in mice inoculated with TGF-β1 transfectants than in those inoculated with the mock transfectants.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These findings provide new evidence that tumor-derived TGF-β1 inhibits migration of DCs from tumors to their draining lymph nodes, and this immunosuppressive effect of TGF-β1 increases the likelihood of metastasis in the affected nodes.</p

Interleukin-4 Selectively Inhibits Interleukin-2 Secretion by Lipopolysaccharide-Activated Dendritic Cells

Indexación: Scopus.Dendritic cells (DCs) generated in vitro from bone marrow precursors using granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) secrete interleukin-2 (IL-2) upon activation, an event probably associated to the initiation of adaptive immune responses. Additionally, they produce IL-12, a cytokine related to T-cell polarization. To analyse the effect of IL-4 on DC differentiation and function, we assessed the capacity of murine bone marrow dendritic cells (BMDCs) differentiated with GM-CSF in the presence or absence of IL-4 to produce IL-2 and IL-12 upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activation. We found that although IL-4 enhanced DC IL-12p70 production, it strongly impaired IL-2 secretion by BMDCs. This inhibition, which depends on the presence of IL-4 during LPS activation, is DC specific, as IL-4 did not affect IL-2 secretion by T cells. Interestingly, inhibition of DC IL-2 production did not prevent DC priming of T lymphocytes. These results illustrate a new putative role for IL-4 on the regulation of the immune response and should help clarify the controversial reports on the effect of IL-4 on DCs.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.0300-9475.2004.01380.

Influence of interleukin-4 on the phenotype and function of bone marrow-derived murine dendritic cells generated under serum-free conditions

Murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (DC) can be generated by culture in the presence of granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) alone or GM-CSF in conjunction with interleukin-4 (IL-4). However, these two culture methods result in the production of heterogeneous DC populations with distinct phenotypic and stimulatory properties. In this study, we investigated the properties of DC generated under serum-free conditions in the presence or absence of IL-4 and compared their yield and phenotype to that of DC generated in the presence of fetal calf serum (FCS) (±IL-4). We did not observe a significant difference in the total cell yield between these four culture conditions, although the proportion of CD11c DC in cultures that received FCS was higher than that of their counterparts generated under serum-free conditions. Also, the four culture conditions generated CD11c DC with comparable levels of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II, CD40, CD80 and CD86 expression, with the exception of cells cultured under serum-free conditions in the absence of IL-4, which displayed suboptimal levels of these markers. Moreover, we compared the functional and stimulatory properties of DC generated under serum-free conditions in the presence or absence of IL-4. DC cultured in the presence of IL-4 were stronger stimulators of allogeneic splenocytes in a primary mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) and of naïve antigen-specific OT-II transgenic T cells when pulsed with the class II ovalbumin (OVA) peptide or whole OVA protein than DC cultured in the absence of IL-4. However, both DC populations displayed a similar capacity to take up fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-albumin by macropinocytosis and FITC-Dextran by the mannose receptor and to secrete IL-12 in response to stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or an agonistic anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody. Therefore, we conclude that although both DC culture methods result in the production of DC with similar functional abilities, under serum-free conditions, DC cultured in GM-CSF and IL-4 show an increased stimulatory potential over DC cultured in GM-CSF alone. This is an important consideration in the design of experiments where DC are being exploited as immunotherapeutic vaccines