6 research outputs found
Management and Outcome of Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in Children since the Marketing of Complement Inhibitors: A Nationwide Study
Treatment and outcome of congenital nephrotic syndrome
BACKGROUND: Recommendations for management of Finnish-type congenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS) followed by many teams include daily albumin infusions, early bilateral nephrectomy, dialysis and transplantation. We aimed to assess the treatment and outcome of patients with CNS in France. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide retrospective study on 55 consecutive children born between 2000 and 2014 treated for non-infectious CNS. RESULTS: The estimated cumulative incidence of CNS was 0.5/100 000 live births. The underlying defect was biallelic mutations in NPHS1 (36/55, 65%), NPHS2 (5/55, 7%), PLCE1 (1/55, 2%), heterozygous mutation in WT1 (4/55, 7%) and not identified in nine children (16%). Fifty-three patients (96%) received daily albumin infusions from diagnosis (median age 14 days), which were spaced and withdrawn in 10 patients. Twenty children (35%) were managed as outpatients. Thirty-nine patients reached end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) at a median age of 11 months. The overall renal survival was 64% and 45% at 1 and 2 years of age, respectively. Thirteen children died during the study period including four at diagnosis, two of nosocomial catheter-related septic shock, six on dialysis and one after transplantation. The remaining 13 patients were alive with normal renal function at last follow-up [median 32 months (range 9-52)]. Renal and patient survivals were longer in patients with NPHS1 mutations than in other patients. The invasive infection rate was 2.41/patient/year. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows: (i) a survival free from ESKD in two-thirds of patients at 1 year and in one-half at 2 years and (ii) a significant reduction or even a discontinuation of albumin infusions allowing ambulatory care in a subset of patients. These results highlight the need for new therapeutic guidelines for CNS patients
Association of vascular risk factors with cervical artery dissection and ischemic stroke in young adults.
Common variation in PHACTR1 is associated with susceptibility to cervical artery dissection
Cervical artery dissection (CeAD), a mural hematoma in a carotid or vertebral artery, is a major cause of ischemic stroke in young adults although relatively uncommon in the general population (incidence of 2.6/100,000 per year)(1). Minor cervical traumas, infection, migraine and hypertension are putative risk factors(1-3), and inverse associations with obesity and hypercholesterolemia are described(3,4). No confirmed genetic susceptibility factors have been identified using candidate gene approaches(5). We performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in 1,393 CeAD cases and 14,416 controls. The rs9349379[G] allele (PHACTR(1)) was associated with lower CeAD risk (odds ratio (OR) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.69-0.82; P = 4.46 x 10(-10)), with confirmation in independent follow-up samples (659 CeAD cases and 2,648 controls; P = 3.91 x 10(-3); combined P = 1.00 x 10(-11)). The rs9349379[G] allele was previously shown to be associated with lower risk of migraine and increased risk of myocardial infarction(6-9). Deciphering the mechanisms underlying this pleiotropy might provide important information on the biological underpinnings of these disabling conditions
Genetic Risk Score for Intracranial Aneurysms: Prediction of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Role in Clinical Heterogeneity
Background: Recently, common genetic risk factors for intracranial aneurysm (IA) and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (ASAH) were found to explain a large amount of disease heritability and therefore have potential to be used for genetic risk prediction. We constructed a genetic risk score to (1) predict ASAH incidence and IA presence (combined set of unruptured IA and ASAH) and (2) assess its association with patient characteristics. Methods: A genetic risk score incorporating genetic association data for IA and 17 traits related to IA (so-called metaGRS) was created using 1161 IA cases and 407 392 controls from the UK Biobank population study. The metaGRS was validated in combination with risk factors blood pressure, sex, and smoking in 828 IA cases and 68 568 controls from the Nordic HUNT population study. Furthermore, we assessed association between the metaGRS and patient characteristics in a cohort of 5560 IA patients. Results: Per SD increase of metaGRS, the hazard ratio for ASAH incidence was 1.34 (95% CI, 1.20-1.51) and the odds ratio for IA presence 1.09 (95% CI, 1.01-1.18). Upon including the metaGRS on top of clinical risk factors, the concordance index to predict ASAH hazard increased from 0.63 (95% CI, 0.59-0.67) to 0.65 (95% CI, 0.62-0.69), while prediction of IA presence did not improve. The metaGRS was statistically significantly associated with age at ASAH (β=-4.82×10-3per year [95% CI, -6.49×10-3to -3.14×10-3]; P=1.82×10-8), and location of IA at the internal carotid artery (odds ratio=0.92 [95% CI, 0.86-0.98]; P=0.0041). Conclusions: The metaGRS was predictive of ASAH incidence, although with limited added value over clinical risk factors. The metaGRS was not predictive of IA presence. Therefore, we do not recommend using this metaGRS in daily clinical care. Genetic risk does partly explain the clinical heterogeneity of IA warranting prioritization of clinical heterogeneity in future genetic prediction studies of IA and ASAH