Management of colorectal cancer presenting with synchronous liver metastases

Up to a fifth of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) present with synchronous hepatic metastases. In patients with CRC who present without intestinal obstruction or perforation and in whom comprehensive whole-body imaging confirms the absence of extrahepatic disease, evidence indicates a state of equipoise between several different management pathways, none of which has demonstrated superiority. Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy is advocated by current guidelines, but must be integrated with surgical management in order to remove the primary tumour and liver metastatic burden. Surgery for CRC with synchronous liver metastases can take a number of forms: the 'classic' approach, involving initial colorectal resection, interval chemotherapy and liver resection as the final step; simultaneous removal of the liver and bowel tumours with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy; or a 'liver-first' approach (before or after systemic chemotherapy) with removal of the colorectal tumour as the final procedure. In patients with rectal primary tumours, the liver-first approach can potentially avoid rectal surgery in patients with a complete response to chemoradiotherapy. We overview the importance of precise nomenclature, the influence of clinical presentation on treatment options, and the need for accurate, up-to-date surgical terminology, staging tests and contemporary management options in CRC and synchronous hepatic metastatic disease, with an emphasis on multidisciplinary care

Predicting Lymph Node Metastases in pT1 Rectal Cancer

Item does not contain fulltextWith the widespread introduction of population screening for colorectal cancer in Europe, the number of early rectal cancers is expected to increase. In the past, approximately 25 % of rectal cancers presented with early disease, defined as stage I disease. First, results from population screening in the UK demonstrate an increase to approximately 50 % stage I for screen-detected carcinomas. In the absence of lymph node metastases, local excision of the tumor might be an attractive option, with considerably less morbidity due to surgery and a lower mortality. This option demonstrates the need for a reliable method of lymph node metastasis prediction in early rectal cancer. The overall risk of lymph node metastasis in pT1 tumors is still considerable, 11.4 %. In order to avoid both under-and overtreatment, we need adequate risk factors

What Is "Good Quality" in Rectal Cancer Surgery? The Pathologist's Perspective

High local recurrence rates were a major problem in rectal cancer treatment, with between 30 and 50 % of patients affected, resulting in a very poor quality of life and short survival of patients with rectal cancer. In recent years, prognosis of rectal cancer has markedly improved, due to innovations in surgical treatment in combination with neoadjuvant therapy. Quality evaluation of surgical procedures has become the standard; constant high quality of surgery is one of the major successes in rectal cancer over the last decade. Continuous monitoring of surgical procedures is a new role for the pathologist. Completeness of excision, resection margins, but also numbers of lymph nodes have been firmly established as quality indicators