To determine the level of satisfaction among medical students of a public sector medical university regarding their academic activities

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>An ongoing evaluation system is essential to determine if the academic system in place has worked to produce a better product, hence the objective of our study was to evaluate the satisfaction level among medical students regarding their academic teaching and assessment method and what measures will they suggest for the future to rectify the current situation.</p> <p>This questionnaire based cross sectional study was conducted in a public sector medical university from February to July 2010. A well structured questionnaire was administered to a random sample of 375 final year medical students. However 292 of the students provided informed consent and filled in the questionnaire which included their demographic profile as well as questions in line with the study objective. Data was entered in a Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version.16) and analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p> <p>Findings</p> <p>The male to female ratio in our study was 1:2. Most of the students (57.2%) were dissatisfied with the quality of teaching in the university. Fifty-seven percent of the participants believed that the current standard of their institute were not at par with those of international medical universities. BCQ's were the mode of examination questions preferred by the majority of the students. Most of the students (66.1%) wanted the university to conduct career planning seminars to help them plan their career.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These results suggest that the students of public sector medical universities are unsatisfied from current academic facilities and teaching activities. Students recommend increased emphasis on better lectures and practical training as well as a need to incorporate career planning sessions for the students to help plan them their future career paths.</p

Job requirements compared to medical school education: differences between graduates from problem-based learning and conventional curricula

Background: Problem-based Learning (PBL) has been suggested as a key educational method of knowledge acquisition to improve medical education. We sought to evaluate the differences in medical school education between graduates from PBL-based and conventional curricula and to what extent these curricula fit job requirements. Methods: Graduates from all German medical schools who graduated between 1996 and 2002 were eligible for this study. Graduates self-assessed nine competencies as required at their day-to-day work and as taught in medical school on a 6-point Likert scale. Results were compared between graduates from a PBL-based curriculum (University Witten/Herdecke) and conventional curricula. Results: Three schools were excluded because of low response rates. Baseline demographics between graduates of the PBL-based curriculum (n = 101, 49% female) and the conventional curricula (n = 4720, 49% female) were similar. No major differences were observed regarding job requirements with priorities for "Independent learning/working" and "Practical medical skills". All competencies were rated to be better taught in PBL-based curriculum compared to the conventional curricula (all p < 0.001), except for "Medical knowledge" and "Research competence". Comparing competencies required at work and taught in medical school, PBL was associated with benefits in "Interdisciplinary thinking" (Δ + 0.88), "Independent learning/working" (Δ + 0.57), "Psycho-social competence" (Δ + 0.56), "Teamwork" (Δ + 0.39) and "Problem-solving skills" (Δ + 0.36), whereas "Research competence" (Δ - 1.23) and "Business competence" (Δ - 1.44) in the PBL-based curriculum needed improvement. Conclusion: Among medical graduates in Germany, PBL demonstrated benefits with regard to competencies which were highly required in the job of physicians. Research and business competence deserve closer attention in future curricular development

Transformação da educação médica: é possível formar um novo médico a partir de mudanças no método de ensino-aprendizagem?

As mudanças na formação dos profissionais médicos têm estado na pauta de discussão das escolas formadoras há algumas décadas. As principais tentativas concretizadas atêm-se, sobretudo, a mudanças metodológicas ou pedagógicas, com a reestruturação dos currículos a partir da inserção da aprendizagem baseada em problemas (ABP) como eixo estruturante. O modelo hegemônico é, ainda, a formação a partir de um currículo de formato tradicional, e a alternativa de mudança mais em voga passa, então, a ser a ABP. O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar esse método e as avaliações de seus resultados, de forma a compor um panorama da sua efetividade na busca do médico crítico, reflexivo e com responsabilidade social. Foi realizada revisão da literatura com busca bibliográfica nas bases SciELO (Scientific Eletronic Library Online), Pubmed (www.nlm.nih.gov) e BVS (Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde), tendo como critério de seleção os artigos publicados sobre o assunto nos últimos 20 anos. Os resultados apontam insuficiência da mudança pedagógica isolada como resposta a uma formação médica capaz de aliar competências técnicas e ético-humanísticas