5 research outputs found

    PrevalĂȘncia de infecção do colo do Ăștero pelo HPV no Brasil: revisĂŁo sistemĂĄtica

    No full text
    OBJETIVO: Analisar a prevalĂȘncia de infecção pelo vĂ­rus do papiloma humano (HPV) em mulheres no Brasil. MÉTODOS: RevisĂŁo sistemĂĄtica que incluiu artigos recuperados em busca livre nos portais PubMed e Biblioteca Virtual em SaĂșde, em abril/2009, utilizando-se os termos "human papillomavirus", "HPV", "prevalence" e "Brazil". Dos 155 artigos identificados, 82 permaneceram apĂłs leitura de tĂ­tulo e resumo e foram submetidos Ă  leitura integral, sendo selecionados 14 artigos. RESULTADOS: Os artigos sobre o tema foram publicados entre 1989 e 2008. Os 14 artigos representaram estudos de quatro regiĂ”es brasileiras (Sudeste 43%, Sul 21,4%, Nordeste 21,4% e Norte 7,1%). Nove artigos relatavam estudos transversais. Em oito utilizaram-se tĂ©cnicas moleculares para tipagem do HPV e em sete deles utilizou-se captura hĂ­brida para detecção do HPV. As populaçÔes estudadas variaram de 49 a 2.329 mulheres. A prevalĂȘncia geral de infecção do colo do Ăștero pelo HPV variou entre 13,7% e 54,3%, e para as mulheres com citologia normal, variou entre 10,4% e 24,5%. Quatro estudos relataram os tipos de HPV mais freqĂŒentes, segundo resultado de citologia. CONCLUSÕES: As tĂ©cnicas de citologia disponĂ­veis resultam em diversas classificaçÔes e estimativas de prevalĂȘncia do HPV. Contudo, considerando separadamente os estudos segundo a tĂ©cnica utilizada, observa-se que a prevalĂȘncia do HPV tem aumentado. O HPV16 foi o tipo mais freqĂŒente entre as mulheres, independentemente do resultado de citologia. A concentração dos estudos na regiĂŁo Sudeste do PaĂ­s, especialmente nas regiĂ”es metropolitanas, mostra que investigaçÔes adicionais serĂŁo necessĂĄrias para aumentar a abrangĂȘncia das informaçÔes disponĂ­veis sobre as mulheres brasileiras.OBJETIVO: Analizar la prevalencia de infecciĂłn por el virus de papiloma humano en mujeres en Brasil. MÉTODOS: RevisiĂłn sistemĂĄtica que incluyĂł artĂ­culos recuperados en bĂșsqueda libre en las pĂĄginas de datos PubMed y Biblioteca Virtual en Salud, en abril/2009, utilizĂĄndose los tĂ©rminos "human papillomavirus", "HPV", "prevalence" y "Brazil". De los 155 artĂ­culos identificados 82 se mantuvieron luego de leer el tĂ­tulo y el resumen y fueron leĂ­dos de forma Ă­ntegra, siendo seleccionados 14 artĂ­culos. RESULTADOS: Los artĂ­culos sobre el tema fueron publicados entre 1989 y 2008. Los 14 artĂ­culos representaron estudios de cuatro regiones brasileras (Sureste - 43%, Sur - 21,4%, Noreste - 21,4% y Norte - 7,1%). Nueve artĂ­culos relatan estudios transversales. En ocho se utilizaron tĂ©cnicas moleculares para tipaje del HPV e siete de ellos se utilizĂł captura hĂ­brida para detecciĂłn del HPV. Las poblaciones estudiadas variaron de 49 a 2.329 mujeres. La prevalencia general de infecciĂłn de cuello de Ăștero por el HPV variĂł entre 13,7% y 54,3%, y para las mujeres con citologĂ­a normal, variĂł entre 10,4% y 24,5%. Cuatro estudios relataron los tipos de HPV mĂĄs frecuentes, segĂșn resultado de citologĂ­a. CONCLUSIONES: Las tĂ©cnicas de citologĂ­a disponibles resultan en diversas clasificaciones y estimaciones de prevalencia del HPV. Sin embargo, considerando separadamente los estudios segĂșn la tĂ©cnica utilizada, se observa que la prevalencia del HPV ha aumentado. El HPV16 fue el tipo mĂĄs frecuente entre las mujeres, independientemente del resultado de citologĂ­a. La concentraciĂłn de los estudios en la regiĂłn Sureste del Brasil, especialmente en las regiones metropolitanas, muestra que las investigaciones adicionales serĂĄn necesarias para aumentar la amplitud de las informaciones disponibles sobre las mujeres brasileñas.OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in women in Brazil. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted with an active search in PubMed and Virtual Health Library databases using the terms "human papillomavirus," "HPV," "prevalence," and "Brazil". Of 155 articles retrieved, 82 were selected after reading their title and abstract. After a thorough examination, 14 articles were included in the study. RESULTS: The 14 articles selected were published between 1989 and 2008 and comprised studies from four Brazilian macroregions (Southeast 43%; South 21.4%; Northeast 21.4%; and North 7.1%). Nine were cross-sectional studies. Eight articles used polymerase chain reaction and seven used hybrid capture for HPV detection. The study samples ranged from 49 to 2,329 women. The overall prevalence of HPV cervical infection was between 13.7% and 54.3%; and women with cytologically normal results had 10% to 24.5% prevalence of HPV cervical infection. Four articles described the most common HPV types. CONCLUSIONS: The cytology techniques available use different classifications leading to different HPV prevalence estimates. However, considering the studies individually according to the detection technique used, the HPV prevalence has increased. HPV16 was the most prevalent type among women, regardless of the cytology result. The concentration of studies in the Southeast region, especially in metropolitan regions, evidences that further investigations are needed to improve information coverage of Brazilian women

    Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in stable cardiovascular disease

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether rivaroxaban alone or in combination with aspirin would be more effective than aspirin alone for secondary cardiovascular prevention. METHODS: In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 27,395 participants with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease to receive rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily), or aspirin (100 mg once daily). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The study was stopped for superiority of the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group after a mean follow-up of 23 months. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group than in the aspirin-alone group (379 patients [4.1%] vs. 496 patients [5.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.86; P<0.001; z=−4.126), but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group (288 patients [3.1%] vs. 170 patients [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.40 to 2.05; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in intracranial or fatal bleeding between these two groups. There were 313 deaths (3.4%) in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group as compared with 378 (4.1%) in the aspirin-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.96; P=0.01; threshold P value for significance, 0.0025). The primary outcome did not occur in significantly fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group than in the aspirin-alone group, but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, those assigned to rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin had better cardiovascular outcomes and more major bleeding events than those assigned to aspirin alone. Rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily) alone did not result in better cardiovascular outcomes than aspirin alone and resulted in more major bleeding events
    corecore