9 research outputs found
Enhanced Humoral Immune Response Correlates With Improved Disease-Free and Overall Survival in American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage II Melanoma Patients Receiving Adjuvant Polyvalent Vaccine
Performing Omentectomy During Gastrectomy Does Not Improve Survival: a Multi-Center Analysis of 471 Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Increased Incidence of Second Primary Melanoma in Patients With a Previous Cutaneous Melanoma
Impact of Statin Use on Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection for Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer
OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that statins exert potential anti-tumor effects. The relationship between statin use and outcomes in pancreatic cancer is controversial. We hypothesized that statin use at baseline would impact survival among patients with early-stage pancreatic cancer and that the effect might vary by individual statin agent. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on data from an integrated healthcare system. We included patients with pancreatic cancer stage I-IIb who underwent resection for curative intent between January 2005 and January 2011. Baseline statin use was characterized as any prior use as well as active use of either simvastatin or lovastatin. Intensity of exposure was calculated as average daily dose prior to surgery. Overall and disease-free survival was assessed from surgery until the end of study (April 2014). We used the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the impact of baseline statin use on survival, adjusting for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity score, resection margin, disease stage, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Among 226 patients, 71 (31.4%) had prior simvastatin use and 27 (11.9%) had prior lovastatin use at baseline. Prior simvastatin but not lovastatin use was associated with improved survival (median 28.5 months (95% confidence limit (CL) 20.8, 38.4) for simvastatin vs. 12.9 months (9.6, 15.5) for lovastatin vs. 16.5 months (14.1, 18.9) for non-statin users; log-rank P=0.0035). In Cox regression, active simvastatin use was independently associated with reduced risk for mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.56 (95% CL 0.38, 0.83), P=0.004) and risk for recurrence (adjusted HR 0.61 (0.41, 0.89), P=0.01). Survival improved significantly among patients who received moderate-high-intensity (median 42.1 months (24.0,52.7)) doses compared with those who received low-intensity doses of simvastatin (median 14.1 months (8.6, 23.8), log-rank P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The effects of statins varied by agent and dose. Active use of moderate-high-dose simvastatin at baseline was associated with improved overall and disease-free survival among patients undergoing resection for pancreatic cancer
Does Sentinel Lymphadenectomy Improve Staging and Alter Therapy in Elderly Women With Breast Cancer?
Does Complete Resection of Melanoma Metastatic to Solid Intra-Abdominal Organs Improve Survival?
Point absorbers in Advanced LIGO
Small, highly absorbing points are randomly present on the surfaces of the
main interferometer optics in Advanced LIGO. The resulting nano-meter scale
thermo-elastic deformations and substrate lenses from these micron-scale
absorbers significantly reduces the sensitivity of the interferometer directly
though a reduction in the power-recycling gain and indirect interactions with
the feedback control system. We review the expected surface deformation from
point absorbers and provide a pedagogical description of the impact on power
build-up in second generation gravitational wave detectors (dual-recycled
Fabry-Perot Michelson interferometers). This analysis predicts that the
power-dependent reduction in interferometer performance will significantly
degrade maximum stored power by up to 50% and hence, limit GW sensitivity, but
suggests system wide corrections that can be implemented in current and future
GW detectors. This is particularly pressing given that future GW detectors call
for an order of magnitude more stored power than currently used in Advanced
LIGO in Observing Run 3. We briefly review strategies to mitigate the effects
of point absorbers in current and future GW wave detectors to maximize the
success of these enterprises.Comment: 49 pages, 16 figures. -V2: typographical errors in equations B9 and
B10 were corrected (stray exponent of "h" was removed). Caption of Figure 9
was corrected to indicate that 40mW was used for absorption in the model, not
10mW as incorrectly indicated in V