73 research outputs found

    Role of Scrib and Dlg in anterior-posterior patterning of the follicular epithelium during Drosophila oogenesis

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Proper patterning of the follicle cell epithelium over the egg chamber is essential for the <it>Drosophila </it>egg development. Differentiation of the epithelium into several distinct cell types along the anterior-posterior axis requires coordinated activities of multiple signaling pathways. Previously, we reported that <it>lethal(2)giant larvae </it>(<it>lgl</it>), a <it>Drosophila </it>tumor suppressor gene, is required in the follicle cells for the posterior follicle cell (PFC) fate induction at mid-oogenesis. Here we explore the role of another two tumor suppressor genes, <it>scribble </it>(<it>scrib</it>) and <it>discs large </it>(<it>dlg</it>), in the epithelial patterning.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We found that removal of <it>scrib </it>or <it>dlg </it>function from the follicle cells at posterior terminal of the egg chamber causes a complete loss of the PFC fate. Aberrant specification and differentiation of the PFCs in the mosaic clones can be ascribed to defects in coordinated activation of the EGFR, JAK and Notch signaling pathways in the multilayered cells. Meanwhile, the clonal analysis revealed that loss-of-function mutations in <it>scrib/dlg </it>at the anterior domains result in a partially penetrant phenotype of defective induction of the stretched and centripetal cell fate, whereas specification of the border cell fate can still occur in the most anterior region of the mutant clones. Further, we showed that <it>scrib </it>genetically interacts with <it>dlg </it>in regulating posterior patterning of the epithelium.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In this study we provide evidence that <it>scrib </it>and <it>dlg </it>function differentially in anterior and posterior patterning of the follicular epithelium at oogenesis. Further genetic analysis indicates that <it>scrib </it>and <it>dlg </it>act in a common pathway to regulate PFC fate induction. This study may open another window for elucidating role of <it>scrib/dlg </it>in controlling epithelial polarity and cell proliferation during development.</p

    The Characteristics of Steamed Bread from Reconstituted Whole Wheat Flour (WWF) of Different Hard Wheat Classes with Different Bran Particle Size Distributions

    No full text
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of reconstituted whole wheat flour (WWF) particle size on flour characteristics and northern-type steamed bread (NTSB) quality. In this study, hard white (HW), hard red winter (HRW), and hard red spring (HRS) wheat classes, and four different bran particle size distributions [D(50) values of 53 μm, 74 μm, 105 μm, and 125 μm] were blended at a ratio of 85% refined flour + 15% bran to create reconstituted WWF and make reconstituted WWF NTSB. Farinograph water absorption and water solvent retention capacity (SRC) increased as bran particle size decreased. Flour and dough strength tests such as lactic acid SRC and Farinograph and Mixolab development time and stability did not show any clear trends with bran particle size. HRW WWF tended to be the exception as Farinograph development time and stability generally increased as particle size increased. Resistance to extension increased as bran particle size decreased for HRW WWF and increased as particle size increased for HW and HRS. These differences in WWF dough rheology trends were likely due to differences in gluten characteristics between the classes. The results showed that larger particle sizes (105 μm and 125 μm) were more conducive to achieving desirable whole wheat NTSB specific volume, color, and texture

    A density functional for sparse matter

    No full text
    Sparse matter is abundant and has both strong local bonds and weak nonbonding forces, in particular nonlocal van der Waals (vdW) forces between atoms separated by empty space. It encompasses a broad spectrum of systems, like soft matter, adsorption systems and biostructures. Density-functional theory (DFT), long since proven successful for dense matter, seems now to have come to a point, where useful extensions to sparse matter are available. In particular, a functional form, vdW-DF (Dion et al 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 246401; Thonhauser et al 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 125112), has been proposed for the nonlocal correlations between electrons and applied to various relevant molecules and materials, including to those layered systems like graphite, boron nitride and molybdenum sulfide, to dimers of benzene, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), doped benzene, cytosine and DNA base pairs, to nonbonding forces in molecules, to adsorbed molecules, like benzene, naphthalene, phenol and adenine on graphite, alumina and metals, to polymer and carbon nanotube (CNT) crystals, and hydrogen storage in graphite and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), and to the structure of DNA and of DNA with intercalators. Comparison with results from wavefunction calculations for the smaller systems and with experimental data for the extended ones show the vdW-DF path to be promising. This could have great ramifications

    Measurement of the CKM angle γγ with B±D[Kπ±π±π]h± B^\pm \to D[K^\mp π^\pm π^\pm π^\mp] h^\pm decays using a binned phase-space approach

    No full text
    The CKM angle γ\gamma is determined from C ⁣PC\!P-violating observables measured in B±D[Kπ±π±π]h±{B^\pm \to D[ K^\mp \pi^\pm\pi^\pm\pi^\mp] h^\pm}, (h=K,π)(h = K,\pi) decays, where the measurements are performed in bins of the decay phase-space of the DD meson. Using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment at centre-of-mass energies of 7,87, 8 and 13TeV13\,\text{TeV}, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 9fb19\,\text{fb}^{-1}, γ\gamma is determined to be \begin{equation*} \gamma = \left( 54.8 \: ^{+\:6.0 }_{-\:5.8} \: ^{+\:0.6}_{-\:0.6} \: ^{+\:6.7}_{-\:4.3} \right)^\circ, \end{equation*} where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic and the third from the external inputs on the coherence factors and strong phases of the DD-meson decays.The CKM angle γ is determined from CP-violating observables measured in B±^{±} → D[K^{∓}π±^{±}π±^{±}π^{∓}]h±^{±}, (h = K, π) decays, where the measurements are performed in bins of the decay phase-space of the D meson. Using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment at centre-of-mass energies of 7, 8 and 13 TeV, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 9 fb1^{−1}, γ is determined to beγ=(54.8+6.05.8+0.60.6+6.74.3), \gamma ={\left(54.8\begin{array}{c}+6.0\\ {}-5.8\end{array}\begin{array}{c}+0.6\\ {}-0.6\end{array}\begin{array}{c}+6.7\\ {}-4.3\end{array}\right)}^{\circ }, where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic and the third from the external inputs on the coherence factors and strong phases of the D-meson decays.[graphic not available: see fulltext]The CKM angle γ\gamma is determined from C ⁣PC\!P-violating observables measured in B±D[Kπ±π±π]h±{B^\pm \to D[ K^\mp \pi^\pm\pi^\pm\pi^\mp] h^\pm}, (h=K,π)(h = K,\pi) decays, where the measurements are performed in bins of the decay phase-space of the DD meson. Using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment at centre-of-mass energies of 7,87, 8 and 13TeV13\,\text{TeV}, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 9fb19\,\text{fb}^{-1}, γ\gamma is determined to be \begin{equation*} \gamma = \left( 54.8 \: ^{+\:6.0 }_{-\:5.8} \: ^{+\:0.6}_{-\:0.6} \: ^{+\:6.7}_{-\:4.3} \right)^\circ, \end{equation*} where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic and the third from the external inputs on the coherence factors and strong phases of the DD-meson decays

    First observation and branching fraction measurement of the Λb0Dsp {\Lambda}_b^0\to {D}_s^{-}p decay

    No full text
    International audienceThe first observation of the Λb0Dsp {\Lambda}_b^0\to {D}_s^{-}p decay is presented using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of s \sqrt{s} = 13 TeV, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 6 fb1^{−1}. Using the Λb0Λc+π {\Lambda}_b^0\to {\Lambda}_c^{+}{\pi}^{-} decay as the normalisation mode, the branching fraction of the Λb0Dsp {\Lambda}_b^0\to {D}_s^{-}p decay is measured to be B(Λb0Dsp)=(12.6±0.5±0.3±1.2)×106 \mathcal{B}\left({\Lambda}_b^0\to {D}_s^{-}p\right)=\left(12.6\pm 0.5\pm 0.3\pm 1.2\right)\times {10}^{-6} , where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic and the third due to uncertainties in the branching fractions of the Λb0Λc+π {\Lambda}_b^0\to {\Lambda}_c^{+}{\pi}^{-} , DsKK+π {D}_s^{-}\to {K}^{-}{K}^{+}{\pi}^{-} and Λc+pKπ+ {\Lambda}_c^{+}\to p{K}^{-}{\pi}^{+} decays.[graphic not available: see fulltext

    Observation of the Bs0 ⁣D+DB^0_s\!\to D^{*+}D^{*-} decay

    No full text
    International audienceThe first observation of the Bs0 {B}_s^0 → D+^{∗+}D^{∗−} decay and the measurement of its branching ratio relative to the B0^{0}→ D+^{∗+}D^{∗−} decay are presented. The data sample used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 9 fb1^{−1} of proton-proton collisions recorded by the LHCb experiment at centre-of-mass energies of 7, 8 and 13 TeV between 2011 and 2018. The decay is observed with more than 10 standard deviations and the time-integrated ratio of branching fractions is determined to beB(Bs0D+D)B(B0D+D)=0.269±0.032±0.011±0.008, \frac{\mathcal{B}\left({B}_s^0\to {D}^{\ast +}{D}^{\ast -}\right)}{\mathcal{B}\left({B}^0\to {D}^{\ast +}{D}^{\ast -}\right)}=0.269\pm 0.032\pm 0.011\pm 0.008, where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic and the third due to the uncertainty of the fragmentation fraction ratio fs_{s}/fd_{d}. The Bs0 {B}_s^0 → D+^{*+}D^{*−} branching fraction is calculated to beB(Bs0D+D)=(2.15±0.26±0.09±0.06±0.16)×104, \mathcal{B}\left({B}_s^0\to {D}^{\ast +}{D}^{\ast -}\right)=\left(2.15\pm 0.26\pm 0.09\pm 0.06\pm 0.16\right)\times {10}^{-4}, where the fourth uncertainty is due to the B0^{0}→ D+^{*+}D^{*−} branching fraction. These results are calculated using the average Bs0 {B}_s^0 meson lifetime in simulation. Correction factors are reported for scenarios where either a purely heavy or a purely light Bs0 {B}_s^0 eigenstate is considered.[graphic not available: see fulltext

    Search for the lepton-flavour violating decays B0K0μ±eB^0 \to K^{*0} \mu^\pm e^\mp and Bs0ϕμ±eB_s^0 \to \phi \mu^\pm e^\mp

    No full text
    A search for the lepton-flavour violating decays B0K0μ±eB^0 \to K^{*0} \mu^\pm e^\mp and Bs0ϕμ±eB_s^0 \to \phi \mu^\pm e^\mp is presented, using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9fb19\,\text{fb}^{-1}. No significant signals are observed and upper limits of \begin{align} {\cal B}( B^0 \to K^{*0} \mu^+ e^- ) &< \phantom{1}5.7\times 10^{-9}~(6.9\times 10^{-9}),\newline {\cal B}( B^0 \to K^{*0} \mu^- e^+ ) &< \phantom{1}6.8\times 10^{-9}~(7.9\times 10^{-9}),\newline {\cal B}( B^0 \to K^{*0} \mu^\pm e^\mp ) &< 10.1\times 10^{-9}~(11.7\times 10^{-9}),\newline {\cal B}( B_s^0 \to \phi \mu^\pm e^\mp ) &< 16.0\times 10^{-9}~(19.8\times 10^{-9}) \end{align} are set at 90% (95%)90\%~(95\%) confidence level. These results constitute the world's most stringent limits to date, with the limit on the decay Bs0ϕμ±eB_s^0 \to \phi \mu^\pm e^\mp the first being set. In addition, limits are reported for scalar and left-handed lepton-flavour violating New Physics scenarios.A search for the lepton-flavour violating decays B0^{0} → K0^{*0}μ±^{±}e^{∓} and Bs0 {B}_s^0 → ϕμ±^{±}e^{∓} is presented, using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9 fb1^{−1}. No significant signals are observed and upper limits ofB(B0K0μ+e)<5.7×109(6.9×109),B(B0K0μe+)<6.8×109(7.9×109),B(B0K0μ±e)<10.1×109(11.7×109),B(Bs0ϕμ±e)<16.0×109(19.8×109) {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\mathcal{B}\left({B}^0\to {K}^{\ast 0}{\mu}^{+}{e}^{-}\right)<5.7\times {10}^{-9}\left(6.9\times {10}^{-9}\right),\\ {}\mathcal{B}\left({B}^0\to {K}^{\ast 0}{\mu}^{-}{e}^{+}\right)<6.8\times {10}^{-9}\left(7.9\times {10}^{-9}\right),\\ {}\mathcal{B}\left({B}^0\to {K}^{\ast 0}{\mu}^{\pm }{e}^{\mp}\right)<10.1\times {10}^{-9}\left(11.7\times {10}^{-9}\right),\\ {}\mathcal{B}\left({B}_s^0\to \phi {\mu}^{\pm }{e}^{\mp}\right)<16.0\times {10}^{-9}\left(19.8\times {10}^{-9}\right)\end{array}} are set at 90% (95%) confidence level. These results constitute the world’s most stringent limits to date, with the limit on the decay Bs0 {B}_s^0 → ϕμ±^{±}e^{∓} the first being set. In addition, limits are reported for scalar and left-handed lepton-flavour violating New Physics scenarios.[graphic not available: see fulltext]A search for the lepton-flavour violating decays B0K0μ±eB^0 \to K^{*0} \mu^\pm e^\mp and Bs0ϕμ±eB_s^0 \to \phi \mu^\pm e^\mp is presented, using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9fb19\,\text{fb}^{-1}. No significant signals are observed and upper limits of \begin{align} {\cal B}( B^0 \to K^{*0} \mu^+ e^- ) &< \phantom{1}5.7\times 10^{-9}~(6.9\times 10^{-9}),\newline {\cal B}( B^0 \to K^{*0} \mu^- e^+ ) &< \phantom{1}6.8\times 10^{-9}~(7.9\times 10^{-9}),\newline {\cal B}( B^0 \to K^{*0} \mu^\pm e^\mp ) &< 10.1\times 10^{-9}~(11.7\times 10^{-9}),\newline {\cal B}( B_s^0 \to \phi \mu^\pm e^\mp ) &< 16.0\times 10^{-9}~(19.8\times 10^{-9}) \end{align} are set at 90% (95%)90\%~(95\%) confidence level. These results constitute the world's most stringent limits to date, with the limit on the decay Bs0ϕμ±eB_s^0 \to \phi \mu^\pm e^\mp the first being set. In addition, limits are reported for scalar and left-handed lepton-flavour violating New Physics scenarios

    Measurement of CP asymmetries in D(s)+ηπ+ {D}_{(s)}^{+}\to \eta {\pi}^{+} and D(s)+ηπ+ {D}_{(s)}^{+}\to {\eta}^{\prime }{\pi}^{+} decays

    No full text
    Searches for CP violation in the decays D(s)+ηπ+ {D}_{(s)}^{+}\to \eta {\pi}^{+} and D(s)+ηπ+ {D}_{(s)}^{+}\to {\eta}^{\prime }{\pi}^{+} are performed using pp collision data corresponding to 6 fb1^{−1} of integrated luminosity collected by the LHCb experiment. The calibration channels D(s)+ϕπ+ {D}_{(s)}^{+}\to \phi {\pi}^{+} are used to remove production and detection asymmetries. The resulting CP-violating asymmetries areACP=(D+ηπ+)=(0.34±0.66±0.16±0.05)%,ACP=(Ds+ηπ+)=(0.32±0.51±0.12)%,ACP=(D+ηπ+)=(0.49±0.18±0.06±0.05)%,ACP=(Ds+ηπ+)=(0.01±0.12±0.08)%, {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}{\mathcal{A}}^{CP}=\left({D}^{+}\to \eta {\pi}^{+}\right)=\left(0.34\pm 0.66\pm 0.16\pm 0.05\right)\%,\\ {}{\mathcal{A}}^{CP}=\left({D}_s^{+}\to \eta {\pi}^{+}\right)=\left(0.32\pm 0.51\pm 0.12\right)\%,\\ {}\begin{array}{l}{\mathcal{A}}^{CP}=\left({D}^{+}\to {\eta}^{\prime }{\pi}^{+}\right)=\left(0.49\pm 0.18\pm 0.06\pm 0.05\right)\%,\\ {}{\mathcal{A}}^{CP}=\left({D}_s^{+}\to {\eta}^{\prime }{\pi}^{+}\right)=\left(0.01\pm 0.12\pm 0.08\right)\%,\end{array}\end{array}} where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third, relevant for the D+^{+} channels, is due to the uncertainty on ACP=(D+ϕπ+) {\mathcal{A}}^{CP}=\left({D}^{+}\to \phi {\pi}^{+}\right) . These measurements, currently the most precise for three of the four channels considered, are consistent with the absence of CP violation. A combination of these results with previous LHCb measurements is presented.[graphic not available: see fulltext]Searches for CPCP violation in the decays D(s)+ηπ+D^+_{(s)}\rightarrow \eta \pi^+ and D(s)+ηπ+D^+_{(s)}\rightarrow \eta^{\prime} \pi^+ are performed using pppp collision data corresponding to 6 fb1^{-1} of integrated luminosity collected by the LHCb experiment. The calibration channels D(s)+ϕπ+D^+_{(s)}\rightarrow \phi \pi^+ are used to remove production and detection asymmetries. The resulting CPCP-violating asymmetries are ACP(D+ηπ+)=(0.34±0.66±0.16±0.05)%A^{CP}(D^+ \rightarrow \eta \pi^+) = (0.34 \pm 0.66 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.05)\%, ACP(Ds+ηπ+)=(0.32±0.51±0.12)%A^{CP}(D^+_s \rightarrow \eta \pi^+) = (0.32 \pm 0.51 \pm 0.12)\%, ACP(D+ηπ+)=(0.49±0.18±0.06±0.05)%A^{CP}(D^+ \rightarrow \eta^{\prime} \pi^+) = (0.49 \pm 0.18 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.05)\%, ACP(Ds+ηπ+)=(0.01±0.12±0.08)%A^{CP}(D^+_s \rightarrow \eta^{\prime} \pi^+) = (0.01 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.08)\%, where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third, relevant for the D+D^+ channels, is due to the uncertainty on ACP(D+ϕπ+)A^{CP}(D^+ \to \phi \pi^+). These measurements, currently the most precise for three of the four channels considered, are consistent with the absence of CPCP violation. A combination of these results with previous LHCb measurements is presented
    corecore