45 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Changes in physical activity following a genetic-based internet-delivered personalized intervention: randomized controlled trial (Food4Me)
Background: There is evidence that physical activity (PA) can attenuate the influence of the fat mass- and obesity-associated (FTO) genotype on the risk to develop obesity. However, whether providing personalized information on FTO genotype leads to changes in PA is unknown. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if disclosing FTO risk had an impact on change in PA following a 6-month intervention. Methods: The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs9939609 in the FTO gene was genotyped in 1279 participants of the Food4Me study, a four-arm, Web-based randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 7 European countries on the effects of personalized advice on nutrition and PA. PA was measured objectively using a TracmorD accelerometer and was self-reported using the Baecke questionnaire at baseline and 6 months. Differences in baseline PA variables between risk (AA and AT genotypes) and nonrisk (TT genotype) carriers were tested using multiple linear regression. Impact of FTO risk disclosure on PA change at 6 months was assessed among participants with inadequate PA, by including an interaction term in the model: disclosure (yes/no) × FTO risk (yes/no).
Results: At baseline, data on PA were available for 874 and 405 participants with the risk and nonrisk FTO genotypes, respectively. There were no significant differences in objectively measured or self-reported baseline PA between risk and nonrisk carriers. A total of 807 (72.05%) of the participants out of 1120 in the personalized groups were encouraged to increase PA at baseline. Knowledge of FTO risk had no impact on PA in either risk or nonrisk carriers after the 6-month intervention. Attrition was higher in nonrisk participants for whom genotype was disclosed (P=.01) compared with their at-risk counterparts. Conclusions: No association between baseline PA and FTO risk genotype was observed. There was no added benefit of disclosing FTO risk on changes in PA in this personalized intervention. Further RCT studies are warranted to confirm whether disclosure of nonrisk genetic test results has adverse effects on engagement in behavior change
Recommended from our members
Effects of a web-based personalized intervention on physical activity in European adults: a randomized controlled trial
Background: The high prevalence of physical inactivity worldwide calls for innovative and more effective ways to promote physical activity (PA). There are limited objective data on the effectiveness of Web-based personalized feedback on increasing PA in adults.
Objective: It is hypothesized that providing personalized advice based on PA measured objectively alongside diet, phenotype, or genotype information would lead to larger and more sustained changes in PA, compared with nonpersonalized advice.
Methods: A total of 1607 adults in seven European countries were randomized to either a control group (nonpersonalized advice, Level 0, L0) or to one of three personalized groups receiving personalized advice via the Internet based on current PA plus diet (Level 1, L1), PA plus diet and phenotype (Level 2, L2), or PA plus diet, phenotype, and genotype (Level 3, L3). PA was measured for 6 months using triaxial accelerometers, and self-reported using the Baecke questionnaire. Outcomes were objective and self-reported PA after 3 and 6 months.
Results: While 1270 participants (85.81% of 1480 actual starters) completed the 6-month trial, 1233 (83.31%) self-reported PA at both baseline and month 6, but only 730 (49.32%) had sufficient objective PA data at both time points. For the total cohort after 6 months, a greater improvement in self-reported total PA (P=.02) and PA during leisure (nonsport) (P=.03) was observed in personalized groups compared with the control group. For individuals advised to increase PA, we also observed greater improvements in those two self-reported indices (P=.006 and P=.008, respectively) with increased personalization of the advice (L2 and L3 vs L1). However, there were no significant differences in accelerometer results between personalized and control groups, and no significant effect of adding phenotypic or genotypic information to the tailored feedback at month 3 or 6. After 6 months, there were small but significant improvements in the objectively measured physical activity level (P<.05), moderate PA (P<.01), and sedentary time (P<.001) for individuals advised to increase PA, but these changes were similar across all groups.
Conclusions: Different levels of personalization produced similar small changes in objective PA. We found no evidence that personalized advice is more effective than conventional “one size fits all” guidelines to promote changes in PA in our Web-based intervention when PA was measured objectively. Based on self-reports, PA increased to a greater extent with more personalized advice. Thus, it is crucial to measure PA objectively in any PA intervention study
Recommended from our members
Objectively measured physical activity in European adults: cross-sectional findings from the Food4Me study
Background
Comparisons of objectively measured physical activity (PA) between residents of European countries measured concurrently with the same protocol are lacking. We aimed to compare PA between the seven European countries involved in the Food4Me Study, using accelerometer data collected remotely via the Internet.
Methods
Of the 1607 participants recruited, 1287 (539 men and 748 women) provided at least 3 weekdays and 2 weekend days of valid accelerometer data (TracmorD) at baseline and were included in the present analyses.
Results
Men were significantly more active than women (physical activity level = 1.74 vs. 1.70, p < 0.001). Time spent in light PA and moderate PA differed significantly between countries but only for women. Adherence to the World Health Organization recommendation to accumulate at least 150 min of moderate-equivalent PA weekly was similar between countries for men (range: 54–65%) but differed significantly between countries for women (range: 26–49%). Prevalence estimates decreased substantially for men and women in all seven countries when PA guidelines were defined as achieving 30 min of moderate and vigorous PA per day.
Conclusions
We were able to obtain valid accelerometer data in real time via the Internet from 80% of participants. Although our estimates are higher compared with data from Sweden, Norway, Portugal and the US, there is room for improvement in PA for all countries involved in the Food4Me Study
Patient safety in Dutch primary care: a study protocol
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Insight into the frequency and seriousness of potentially unsafe situations may be the first step towards improving patient safety. Most patient safety attention has been paid to patient safety in hospitals. However, in many countries, patients receive most of their healthcare in primary care settings. There is little concrete information about patient safety in primary care in the Netherlands. The overall aim of this study was to provide insight into the current patient safety issues in Dutch general practices, out-of-hours primary care centres, general dental practices, midwifery practices, and allied healthcare practices. The objectives of this study are: to determine the frequency, type, impact, and causes of incidents found in the records of primary care patients; to determine the type, impact, and causes of incidents reported by Dutch healthcare professionals; and to provide insight into patient safety management in primary care practices.</p> <p>Design and methods</p> <p>The study consists of three parts: a retrospective patient record study of 1,000 records per practice type was conducted to determine the frequency, type, impact, and causes of incidents found in the records of primary care patients (objective one); a prospective component concerns an incident-reporting study in each of the participating practices, during two successive weeks, to determine the type, impact, and causes of incidents reported by Dutch healthcare professionals (objective two); to provide insight into patient safety management in Dutch primary care practices (objective three), we surveyed organizational and cultural items relating to patient safety. We analysed the incidents found in the retrospective patient record study and the prospective incident-reporting study by type of incident, causes (Eindhoven Classification Model), actual harm (severity-of-outcome domain of the International Taxonomy of Medical Errors in Primary Care), and probability of severe harm or death.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>To estimate the frequency of incidents was difficult. Much depended on the accuracy of the patient records and the professionals' consensus about which types of adverse events have to be recognized as incidents.</p
State of the art of aeolian and dune research on the Dutch and Belgian coast
Five years ago, at the previous anniversary of the NCK days, an overview was presented of the state of the art of “Measuring and modelling coastal dune development in the Netherlands” (De Groot et al., 2012). At that moment, new coastal-dune research had sprung up in the Netherlands after a relatively quiet period of about two decades, and the individual research projects were just starting to interconnect. Since then, research has blossomed. A large number of PhD students, postdocs and staff of many institutes are involved, and coastal aeolian processes have become a permanent topic of recent NCK days. Young researchers are meeting a couple of times per year to discuss their work informally, and several PhD theses were defended
Objectively measured physical activity in european adults: cross-sectional findings from the Food4Me study
Introduction
Physical inactivity has been estimated to be responsible for more than 5.3 million deaths worldwide
[1]. Moreover, among European men and women, approximately 7.3% of all deaths in
2008 might be attributable to inactivity compared with 3.7% to obesity [2] and there is strong
evidence to suggest that even small increases in physical activity (PA) would lower the risk for
many non-communicable diseases [1–3]. Yet, levels of PA across populations remain low [4].
To tackle this public health issue, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the
American College of Sports Medicine produced standardized PA guidelines 20 years ago [5].
Since then, the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Union, and most countries
around the world, have included PA guidelines in their health policies. Guidelines for Americans
and Europeans have been updated to include recommendations for adolescents and for
older adults [6–9]. For adults aged 18–64 years old, the WHO recommends a minimum of 150
min of moderate intensity PA per week, 75 min of vigorous intensity PA or an equivalent
amount of moderate and vigorous PA (MVPA) [9].
In 2008, 34.8% of adults 15 years or older were insufficiently active in Europe [4]. Regular
surveillance is needed to update these prevalence estimates and to evaluate the effectiveness of
PA policies and promotion programs in European countries. In this context, the objective
assessment of PA is a key issue. Prevalence of physical inactivity has been mainly derived from
self-reported measures such as the Baecke questionnaire [10] or the International Physical
Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [11]. These questionnaires have been, and still are, widely used
due to their simple administration and low cost [12]. However, PA is frequently misreported,
which leads to considerable measurement error [13–15]. Accelerometers offer a potential solution
because they measure PA objectively. Given that they are small and easy to wear, store
data up to several weeks and are acceptable in terms of reliability, these devices are now used
increasingly in large studies to assess PA in children, adolescents and adults [16]. Although
some European countries have reported adherence to PA guidelines using accelerometers in
large cohorts [17–19], comparisons between European countries measured according to the
same standardized protocols and concurrently are lacking.
Between 2012 and 2014, PA was assessed objectively by accelerometry in the participants of
the Food4Me Proof-of-Principle (PoP) study. The Food4Me Study was a web-based randomized
controlled trial on personalized nutrition, across seven European countries: Germany,
Greece, Ireland, The Netherlands, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom. The aim of the current
paper is to describe and compare PA in adults from these countries, and evaluate adherence
to PA guidelines, using baseline data from the Food4Me PoP study
Protocol for evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of ePrescribing systems and candidate prototype for other related health information technologies
Background:
This protocol concerns the assessment of cost-effectiveness of hospital health information technology (HIT) in four hospitals. Two of these hospitals are acquiring ePrescribing systems incorporating extensive decision support, while the other two will implement systems incorporating more basic clinical algorithms. Implementation of an ePrescribing system will have diffuse effects over myriad clinical processes, so the protocol has to deal with a large amount of information collected at various ‘levels’ across the system.
Methods/Design:
The method we propose is use of Bayesian ideas as a philosophical guide.
Assessment of cost-effectiveness requires a number of parameters in order to measure incremental cost utility or benefit – the effectiveness of the intervention in reducing frequency of preventable adverse events; utilities for these adverse events; costs of HIT systems; and cost consequences of adverse events averted. There is no single end-point that adequately and unproblematically captures the effectiveness of the intervention; we therefore plan to observe changes in error rates and adverse events in four error categories (death, permanent disability, moderate disability, minimal effect). For each category we will elicit and pool subjective probability densities from experts for reductions in adverse events, resulting from deployment of the intervention in a hospital with extensive decision support. The experts will have been briefed with quantitative and qualitative data from the study and external data sources prior to elicitation. Following this, there will be a process of deliberative dialogues so that experts can “re-calibrate” their subjective probability estimates. The consolidated densities assembled from the repeat elicitation exercise will then be used to populate a health economic model, along with salient utilities. The credible limits from these densities can define thresholds for sensitivity analyses.
Discussion:
The protocol we present here was designed for evaluation of ePrescribing systems. However, the methodology we propose could be used whenever research cannot provide a direct and unbiased measure of comparative effectiveness
Patient safety in hospitals: new insight form the Dutch adverse event study.
The adverse event study is the first part of the Dutch national research program on patient safety. The main parts of the program are: (1a) a retrospective epidemiological study in 21 hospitals into the character, severity, extent and costs of adverse events during hospitalization and the resulting harm to patients, (1b) a retrospective epidemiological study of adverse events during day-care in these hospitals, and (1c) a comparison between the adverse events of the record study, the incident reported by professionals and the complaints reported by patients