40 research outputs found

    A Brokering Framework for Assessing Legal Risks in Big Data and the Cloud

    Get PDF
    “Cloud computing” and “Big Data” are amongst the most hyped-up terms and buzzwords of the moment. After decades in which individuals and companies used to host their data and applications using their own IT infrastructure, the world has seen the stunning transformation of the Internet. Major shifts occurred when these infrastructures began to be outsourced to public Cloud providers to match commercial expectations. Storing, sharing and transferring data and databases over the Internet is convenient, yet legal risks cannot be eliminated. Legal risk is a fast-growing area of research and covers various aspects of law. Current studies and research on Cloud computing legal risk assessment have been, however, limited in scope and focused mainly on security and privacy aspects. There is little systematic research on the risks, threats and impact of the legal issues inherent to database rights and “ownership” rights of data. Database rights seem to be outdated and there is a significant gap in the scientific literature when it comes to the understanding of how to apply its provisions in the Big Data era. This means that we need a whole new framework for understanding, protecting and sharing data in the Cloud. The scheme we propose in this chapter is based on a risk assessment-brokering framework that works side by side with Service Level Agreements (SLAs). This proposed framework will provide better control for Cloud users and will go a long way to increase confidence and reinforce trust in Cloud computing transactions

    Comparison of different methods to characterise the abrasivity potential and mechanical properties of carbonates with respect to its relevance for practical purposes in excavation technologies

    No full text
    Abstract The characterisation of the abrasivity potential of carbonates plays an important role for drilling-based excavation technologies, for example in tunneling or geothermal exploration. Although carbonates are known to have a rather low abrasivity, they have been associated with severe excavation performance reductions. We compared different methods to characterise the abrasivity potential of carbonates with respect to its applicability for practical purposes in excavation technologies. In this study, seven carbonate rocks were investigated which differ with respect to their microstructural properties and degrees of dolomitisation. These carbonate rock samples were selected from different lithological units in Germany (Jurassic: Kelheimer limestone, Wachenzell dolomite, Solnhofen limestone, Pappenheim limestone, Treuchtlingen limestone; Devonian: Wülfrath limestone, Brilon limestone). Rock samples were characterised with respect to basic physical properties (density, ultrasound velocity), microstructure (thin section analysis, XRD), mechanical properties (uniaxial compressive strength UCS, splitting tensile strength STS) and commonly applied abrasivity indices (Cerchar abrasivity index test CAI, LCPC test) as well as derived indices (equivalent quartz content eQu). Our results confirm that the tested carbonate rocks show low abrasivity indices in terms of CAI, LCPC and eQu with an increase in abrasivity potential with increasing dolomite content. The microstructural properties play an important role for the abrasiveness of purely calcitic carbonates. Uniaxial compressive strength and splitting tensile strength were high and can additionally be, as has been shown before, particularly sensitive to sample preparation. We conclude that carefully determining the mechanical properties of carbonate rock samples in combination with common approaches to determine the abrasivity potential is key to properly predict tool wear, and required to derive information on performance in carbonate rocks. This study is the outcome of a research-oriented teaching program at Ruhr-University Bochum within the Geoscience curriculum for students with focus on Engineering Geology. Student authors are listed in alphabetical order (Aderhold to Zinke).</jats:p
    corecore